Channel
@rinzler_channel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
49subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001687796506 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rinzler_channel |
| Description | Out there is a new world. Out there is our destiny. |
| Created | 31 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rinzler_channel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:00 | 49 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 49 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 23 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 August 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
118 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 46 | 39.0% | |
| 🤮 | 20 | 16.9% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 13.6% | |
| 🤔 | 15 | 12.7% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 6.78% | |
| 🤬 | 8 | 6.78% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| 😡 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.847% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2022 to 31 August 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Not satisfied with infiltrating the dissident right, Vanya Dogestoevky's wedding of communists with Christians is met with incredulity. The Soviet Union executed over 100K Russian clergymen between 1937 and 1941 alone, and overall, martyred up to 20M Christians. Soviet archives confirm Stalin established the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) as an NKVD front in 1943 and that ROC's current leader, Patriarch Kirill, is a…
👏8👍1
Highlight of Vanya Dogestoevsky's tweets. Dogestoevsky is the trans-dating tankie and Duginist whom Guide to Kulchur host Frodi Midjord saw fit to appoint as his administrator and shape dissident right discourse. Dogestoevsky is a member of communist organization Center for Political Innovation (CPI). His trans "girlfriend", CharChar Darling, also a CPI member, is colleague and good friend of CPI founder and Russia …
👍6🤮2🤯1
Marxist-Leninist Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) party's promotion of white genocide ruled not hate speech by Johannesburg High Court. Civil rights organization AfriForum's argument that "Shoot/Kill the Boer" song incites violence against white South Africans dismissed. EFF is ideologically inspired by Marxist revolutionaries Frantz Fanon and Thomas Sankara ("Africa's Che Guevara"). ― Tweet by The Citizen News (Twi…
🤬4😡1
Traditionalist Worker Party co-founder Matt Parrott defines "pro-Ukrainian" as abandoning Ukrainians to hasten their capitulation to their Eurasian invaders. ― Message by Matt Parrott (Telegram)
👍7🤮5🤔2🤬2
Yesterday, Lauren Southern condemned the celebration of Darya Dugina's assassination as "some of the sickest, most hypocritical, depraved, morally repugnant behavior that I've witnessed in my entire life" and denounced celebrators as "cowards" and "pathetic". Southern says she's being mistaken for Dugina because multiple individuals and news outlets used a photo of her meeting with Alexander Dugin in Moscow to depic…
😁8🔥2
Last night, on Guide to Kulchur, host Frodi Midjord said he'd sooner fraternize with tankies than anti-Duginists and anti-communists, whom he disingenuously marginalized as antisocial wignats. Midjord and co-host American Krogan were asked: why communist radical Vanya Dogestoevsky was appointed as Midjord's Telegram group chat administrator, a role he reportedly bought his way into as a donor; why commenters faced b…
👍9🤮4
Petrified that Duginist ideologues are coming to be seen as "legitimate military targets", Keith Woods uncharacteristically resorts to an anti-communist argument. If Woods has such a guilty conscience, perhaps he should stop "trumpeting". ― Message by Keith Woods (Telegram) ― Article by Nicholas R. Jeelvy (Counter-Currents)
👏8
So-called white nationalist Joel Davis hisses at Ukrainian independence from Bolsheviks and Asiatics. ― Message by Joel Davis (Telegram)
🤮9👍5🤔1🤬1😡1
Entryist communist radical Vanya Dogestoevsky is actively infiltrating dissident right circles by lavishing streamers with eyebrow-raising donations to buy his way into positions of influence and authority. During his recent foray as Frodi Midjord's administrator, he backed censoring anti-Duginist rhetoric and distributed Stalinist propaganda. ― Messages by Grey Swan (Telegram)
👍9🤔1🤬1
Frodi Midjord implicitly responds to criticism from fellow dissidents by revoking Vanya Dogestoevsky's administrative role. A more explicit response and the unbanning of his critics would go one step further. Lest there be any ambiguity, Dogestoevsky defiantly reminds us of his unrepentant devotion to Alexander Dugin. ― Tweet by Vanya Dogestoevsky (Twitter)
👍9
Amidst accusations of spreading "tankie", "radical leftist", "Nazbol", and "commie" propaganda, Vanya Dogestoevsky is trying to downplay his role as Frodi Midjord's administrator as a mere occasional and "benign" commenter. Using the Islamic expression "Alhamdulillah", he thanks God at the prospect of being executed or worked to death under communist rule. ― Tweet by Vanya Dogestoevsky (Twitter)
🤔6
Guide to Kulchur host Frodi Midjord is now instantly banning commenters for asking why he's appointed rabid communist and Duginist Vanya Dogestoevsky as administrator. At the very same time, Dogestoevsky mockingly tweets about "Telegram Nazis". ― Tweet by Vanya Dogestoevsky (Twitter)
🤔5
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @rinzler_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 999,859 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@rinzler_channel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rinzler (Channel)” (@rinzler_channel), 49 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rinzler_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.