Channel
@ringthebellpics
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
70subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002470730806 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ringthebellpics |
| Description | Это канал с моими рисунками Личное и рестлинг здесь – @piper_iwf |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ringthebellpics |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 70 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 70 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 22 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
201 reactions across 13 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 201 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 201reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2025 to 28 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
За время тишины была сделана тонна стадиков, половину из которых показывать не буду, потому что они поверх фоток( Не могу избавиться от ощущения, что все картинки нарисованы разными людьми
💘15
Сложу сюда для архива Это я брелки делала, они закончились уже
💘17
Поделюсь процессом 😁 Боже похоже я реально фурри, я с большим трудом рисую и рендерю людей, но пепсу вот пожалуйста. Догадаетесь на что фан арт рисую? 🧐
💘15
Последнее артфайтовое. Пыталась тратить на все картинки не супер много времени, потому что мне сложно сидеть над одной работой супер долго (с каждой минутой повышается шанс, что я ее заброшу) Вот нарисовала человеку его оса по рейн ворлду. Визуально нравится эта игра, но играть в нее не понравилось, хотя иногда хочется зайти потыкать
💘16
Ураааа еще фурри. Тоже штука с артфайта. Вот тут уже много деталек на персонажах, я такое не люблю рисовать, но постаралась нарисовать всем ответки, кто делал картинки для меня
💘10
Еще штука с артфайта Колуднства какие-то. Люблю рисовать персонажей, с которыми легко придумать сюжет и не надо сидеть мозги себе ебать из-за расположения пятен на морде лица (я все равно рисовала таких)
💘13
Оказывается, забыла с артфайта все показать. Пофиг что новый артфайт уже ближе, чем прошлый Она была фурри художником…
💘16
Я ненавижу рендерить
💘14
Админ канала ходил на выставку-маркет чтобы посмотреть на керамику и понюхать свечки Там был еще какой-то закуток, где можно было нарисовать картинку и повесить на стенку, нарисовалось первое что пришло в голову. Рыбы мои рыбы
💘20
Это я вам экран фотографирую, потому что мне нравится так делать и спойлерю новых приколышей мерчовых
💘19
Было задание-упражнение на сундукус, вот какой-то обыкновенный, потом буду веселый рисовать
💘14
Прохожу рисовальный курс, поэтому хочешь или нет, надо рисовать. Вот вам камни
💘19
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ringthebellpics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,143,107 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ringthebell” (@ringthebellpics), 70 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ringthebellpics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.