Channel
@rinatan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
8subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003286184272 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rinatan |
| Description | designed by t.me/amdysport |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 18 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rinatan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 8 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 8 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 18 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
39 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🌚 | 15 | 38.5% | |
| 👻 | 12 | 30.8% | |
| 👀 | 11 | 28.2% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 2.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 12 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ᅠ ᅠ remember _ blackwhıte 꿀 — off ınfo ( off teasers ✦ conf. cıtfomea ent ) ᅠ сегодня вечером стали доступны вторые фото-тизеры к грядущему масштабному коллаборационному проекту, чей релиз, согласно по предварительным данным, запланирован на 21 декабря. ᅠ
⭐また 🦴 ꪑ᥆ꪀ : ૮ꫝꪋꪶꪱ૮ꫀ 🤩 m⃨y⃨ 𝔰𝔞𝔳𝔦𝔬𝔲𝔯 🤩 𝒚𝒐𝒖 🤍 🤍 ຣກຣ 😻😻😻😻😻սρꤤ 😻😻В соцсетях было опубликовано тизер к масштабному коллабу с @otVENDETTA @kaizenks @agonynni @EX1S7M @crush4ver @lovet1con @rinatan @aesc3nt @mexhonnie @muerarpheus😻 🦴𝑐ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑠ℎ 𝙢𝙮 𝑙♡𝑣𝑒 𝚑𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚒𝚜 🦴 C͟͟F͟͟M͟͟
рест до 3 декабря! готовлюсь к итоговому сочинению, ибо хочу сдать на высокий балл 🩷 сотрудничества не разрываются
🌚2👀2👻1
Sticker, posted without a caption
𝖳𝗁is is ( 𝟐𝟓 ) l𝗮𝗻𝘁ana ꉁ 📓꯭𝗖𝗮𝗺era fl˖sh 💭᷼ обновленuе 📢❌ IG > With my girls! @ottmurfe @muerarpheus @crush4ver @otVENDETTA
👀4🌚3👻3🆒1
Sticker, posted without a caption
𝖳𝗁is is ( 𝟐𝟓 ) l𝗮𝗻𝘁ana ꉁ 📓꯭𝗖𝗮𝗺era fl˖sh 💭᷼ оmкрыmuе 📢❌ IG на платформе IG* был зарегистрирован аккаунт под именем LANTANA. на главной странице было опубликовано 3 поста двухмесячной давности, а также история на фоне неизвестного здания с отметкой Resound Music. наблюдатели все более склонны к тому, что LANTANA вскоре станет новой артисткой компании * запрещенный ресурс
👻6🌚5👀3
Sticker, posted without a caption
/_* 📓 обновленue no 💭᷼ пymu Con𝖿𝗂𝗋𝗆𝖾𝖽 by 🗝️Resound Music 𝗲𝗻𝘁 девушка, ранее замеченная около Citfomea в компании трех незнакомок, также была замечена рядом с Resound Music Ent. по слухам она будет продвигаться сольно под крылом компании, либо является стаффом. официальных заявлений пока не было
🌚5👀2👻2
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @rinatan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 685,106 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@rinatan named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🗝️l𝗮𝗻𝘁ana ⃘￮flash” (@rinatan), 8 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rinatan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.