Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🦇 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑦

@rin4grey

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

45subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002965662063
TypeChannel
Username@rin4grey
Description𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚢 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚒𝚐𝚗.
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/rin4grey

Growth

4510 Aug 2026, 09:16 — 45 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 15:01 — 45 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 09:1610 Aug 2026, 15:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 44–46 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 15:0145no change
10 Aug 2026, 09:1645first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
81.7%
avg views ÷ 45 subscribers
Avg views / post
36.8
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held17 (27 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total625
Reactions total62
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
151
Videos
10
Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

62 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥2235.5%
🥰812.9%
👍58.06%
custom 524902647186276339846.45%
custom 528963123441305725546.45%
custom 531892449621471689634.84%
custom 532350992355900152434.84%
💋34.84%
custom 541567682076478371723.23%
👀23.23%
🔥23.23%
🤯23.23%
custom 522213908753156251211.61%
11.61%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC22 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Это блядский культ Ренаты.

👀1💋1🥰1

9 Aug 2026, 00:33 UTC20 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Давайте реакции ребята, я в вас верю 🫶

👍1

8 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC19 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Обоже да, я закончила это Чувствую себя свободной (нет)

1👀1👍1💋1custom 53235099235590015241

5 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC30 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Чота делаю🕊🕊🥀

❤‍🔥2🤯2custom 53235099235590015241

1 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC43 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

В два часа ночи пыталась в попыхах начать переписывать историю Рины.. сейчас зашла в заметки почитать, это просто какой-то бред сумасшедшего

❤‍🔥2💋1

1 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTC42 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Начеркала мини Ренатку🌟 Пока что в планах пару видео в тт залить или что-то такое

custom 52490264718627633983❤‍🔥2custom 54156768207647837172

30 Jul 2026, 20:39 UTC39 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Реакции/репостики пожалуйста..?🌟

❤‍🔥1👍1

30 Jul 2026, 20:35 UTC72 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Да неужели, я сделала это. Мне не очень нравится правда, но для первого раза сойдёт наверное?

custom 52896312344130572554❤‍🔥3custom 52221390875315625121custom 52490264718627633981custom 53189244962147168961custom 53235099235590015241

29 Jul 2026, 13:33 UTC40 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ебать скример конечно

❤‍🔥2

29 Jul 2026, 13:33 UTC40 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ало тренды, дада не успеваю

❤‍🔥2custom 53189244962147168962

28 Jul 2026, 23:17 UTC36 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥1👍1

28 Jul 2026, 23:17 UTC33 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Очень рандомно, но мне кажется что у Рины мог бы быть голос как у Sofia Isella

❤‍🔥1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @rin4grey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 573,670 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🦇 𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑦” (@rin4grey), 45 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rin4grey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.