Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Закрыто|| ꔫ 🐠 𝑟𝑖𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑 ` ᰋ

@rilandd

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

32subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002177383588
TypeChannel
Username@rilandd
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 14 August 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rilandd

Growth

3213 Aug 2026, 04:31 — 32 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 08:47 — 32 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 04:3113 Aug 2026, 08:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31–33 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:4732no change
13 Aug 2026, 04:3132first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 14 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

254 reactions across 10 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52309397418090362205521.7%
custom 52309613497895047914618.1%
custom 52292164591959614294517.7%
custom 5230966151562940210218.27%
custom 5328261660626921821155.91%
custom 5328121919570987552145.51%
custom 5328303235910355593145.51%
💘135.12%
custom 523148566221713050283.15%
custom 532569134603856751483.15%
62.36%
👻31.18%
custom 546328909733640524420.787%
custom 546551145944423528820.787%
🍓10.394%
💋10.394%

Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 254reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2024 to 13 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Dec 2024, 21:42 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «Закрыто|| ꔫ 🐠 𝑟𝑖𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑 ` ᰋ»

2 Nov 2024, 22:22 UTC466 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

✱︎ ᑎ𝙚𝖶 𝖯𝗈‌𝘀𝗍 𝗋𝗂.𝖫𝖺𝙉𝖽 ¡! 🩵 ㅤ[[ • -- Poᖇ𝙩 @rilandd 𝘽o𝗈‌!st » —— 𝙔𝖾𝗌‌, 𝗈𝖥 ᑕ𝗈𝖴𝙧𝗌𝗲‌ 𝐈 𝗐𝗶𝖫𝗅, 𝗆𝘆‌ 𝖽𝗔𝗋𝖫𝗶𝗇ᘜ // ( ^🧽^ ) & 𝖭𝗮ᐯ𝗂𝗴𝖺T‌𝗂.𝗈‌𝗇 . . 𝖲𝙘𝖧ᑭ ** // ♡ #хз ы ¡! -❕- 🐬— 𝗉𝗹𝗌‌ 𝗿𝖾ᗩ𝖼𝙩𝗂𝖮𝗇 𝗮𝘯𝖽 𝖱𝗲‌𝗉𝖮Տ𝙩 ¡

custom 523093974180903622011custom 52292164591959614296custom 53283032359103555936💘1custom 52309613497895047911

2 Nov 2024, 22:21 UTC394 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 54655114594442352882💋1custom 52309661515629402101

28 Oct 2024, 08:38 UTC415 views45 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

✱︎ ᑎ𝙚𝖶 𝖯𝗈‌𝘀𝗍 𝗋𝗂.𝖫𝖺𝙉𝖽 ¡! 🩵 ㅤ[[ • -- Poᖇ𝙩 @rilandd 𝘽o𝗈‌!st » —— 𝙔𝖾𝗌‌, 𝗈𝖥 ᑕ𝗈𝖴𝙧𝗌𝗲‌ 𝐈 𝗐𝗶𝖫𝗅, 𝗆𝘆‌ 𝖽𝗔𝗋𝖫𝗶𝗇ᘜ // ( ^🧽^ ) & 𝖭𝗮ᐯ𝗂𝗴𝖺T‌𝗂.𝗈‌𝗇 . . 𝖲𝙘𝖧ᑭ ** // ♡ #баннер ы ¡! -❕- 🐬— 𝗉𝗹𝗌‌ 𝗿𝖾ᗩ𝖼𝙩𝗂𝖮𝗇 𝗮𝘯𝖽 𝖱𝗲‌𝗉𝖮Տ𝙩 ¡¡ cr @reverse1999png on tg

custom 523096134978950479114custom 523096615156294021011custom 522921645919596142910custom 52309397418090362204custom 53281219195709875522custom 53282616606269218212💘1custom 52314856622171305021

7 Oct 2024, 16:07 UTC486 views46 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

✱︎ ᑎ𝙚𝖶 𝖯𝗈‌𝘀𝗍 𝗋𝗂.𝖫𝖺𝙉𝖽 ¡! 🩵 ㅤ[[ • -- Poᖇ𝙩 @rilandd 𝘽o𝗈‌!st » —— 𝙔𝖾𝗌‌, 𝗈𝖥 ᑕ𝗈𝖴𝙧𝗌𝗲‌ 𝐈 𝗐𝗶𝖫𝗅, 𝗆𝘆‌ 𝖽𝗔𝗋𝖫𝗶𝗇ᘜ // ( ^🧽^ ) & 𝖭𝗮ᐯ𝗂𝗴𝖺T‌𝗂.𝗈‌𝗇 . . 𝖲𝙘𝖧ᑭ ** // ♡ #баннер ¡! -❕- 🐬— 𝗉𝗹𝗌‌ 𝗿𝖾ᗩ𝖼𝙩𝗂𝖮𝗇 𝗮𝘯𝖽 𝖱𝗲‌𝗉𝖮Տ𝙩 ¡¡

custom 522921645919596142914custom 532826166062692182112custom 523093974180903622086custom 52309613497895047913custom 52314856622171305023

6 Oct 2024, 07:50 UTC465 viewsread 13 August 2026

Лала, расскажите, почему и как вы боритесь со своими «красными флажками»? Почему вы не приняли себя с ними – Только заметила анон соо... извините... Не уверена, что прям борюсь с ними, потому что я их даже не всегда замечаю. То есть, определенно когда я вижу, что сотворила/сказала какую-то фигню (не в плане кринжовую, а в плане обидную для кого-то), то просто стараюсь чаще обдумывать свои слова, прежде чем говори

1 Oct 2024, 08:23 UTC522 views17 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

✱︎ ᑎ𝙚𝖶 𝖯𝗈‌𝘀𝗍 𝗋𝗂.𝖫𝖺𝙉𝖽 ¡! 🩵 ㅤ[[ • -- Poᖇ𝙩 @rilandd 𝘽o𝗈‌!st » —— 𝙔𝖾𝗌‌, 𝗈𝖥 ᑕ𝗈𝖴𝙧𝗌𝗲‌ 𝐈 𝗐𝗶𝖫𝗅, 𝗆𝘆‌ 𝖽𝗔𝗋𝖫𝗶𝗇ᘜ // ( ^🧽^ ) & 𝖭𝗮ᐯ𝗂𝗴𝖺T‌𝗂.𝗈‌𝗇 . . 𝖲𝙘𝖧ᑭ ** // ♡ #баннер ¡! -❕- 🐬— 𝗉𝗹𝗌‌ 𝗿𝖾ᗩ𝖼𝙩𝗂𝖮𝗇 𝗮𝘯𝖽 𝖱𝗲‌𝗉𝖮Տ𝙩 ¡¡

custom 52309613497895047918custom 52309397418090362205custom 52292164591959614294

26 Sept 2024, 20:15 UTC510 views48 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

✱︎ ᑎ𝙚𝖶 𝖯𝗈‌𝘀𝗍 𝗋𝗂.𝖫𝖺𝙉𝖽 ¡! 🩵 ㅤ[[ • -- Poᖇ𝙩 @rilandd 𝘽o𝗈‌!st » —— 𝙔𝖾𝗌‌, 𝗈𝖥 ᑕ𝗈𝖴𝙧𝗌𝗲‌ 𝐈 𝗐𝗶𝖫𝗅, 𝗆𝘆‌ 𝖽𝗔𝗋𝖫𝗶𝗇ᘜ // ( ^🧽^ ) & 𝖭𝗮ᐯ𝗂𝗴𝖺T‌𝗂.𝗈‌𝗇 . . 𝖲𝙘𝖧ᑭ ** // ♡ #баннер ¡! -❕- 🐬— 𝗉𝗹𝗌‌ 𝗿𝖾ᗩ𝖼𝙩𝗂𝖮𝗇 𝗮𝘯𝖽 𝖱𝗲‌𝗉𝖮Տ𝙩 ¡¡

custom 523093974180903622014custom 523096134978950479113custom 532812191957098755210💘6custom 52309661515629402104custom 54632890973364052441

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @rilandd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,049,472 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Закрыто|| ꔫ 🐠 𝑟𝑖𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑑 ` ᰋ” (@rilandd), 32 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rilandd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.