Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝘈ⲕⲃⲁⲣⲉⲗьⲏⲁя ⲣυⲫⲙⲁ

Channel

𝘈ⲕⲃⲁⲣⲉⲗьⲏⲁя ⲣυⲫⲙⲁ

@rifma_v_akvareli

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

39subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003169759417
TypeChannel
Username@rifma_v_akvareli
CreatedBetween 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rifma_v_akvareli

Growth

3739387 August 2026 — 38 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38 subscribers16 August 2026 — 37 subscribers15 September 2026 — 39 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 39 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37–39 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 13:5739+2
16 Aug 2026, 05:4837-1
10 Aug 2026, 21:0138no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:3438first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

69 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2130.4%
custom 54676971382364186081420.3%
❤‍🔥1014.5%
🥰913.0%
custom 5447303478168802816811.6%
🔥45.80%
🕊22.90%
custom 523328494427651790111.45%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC29 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🥛отыльки Поднимем белоснежный парус И в белоснежных облаках Красивой белоснежной парой, Как два упрямых мотылька Мы двинем судно наше к свету. Не суть — в рассвет, или в закат... Так надоела темень эта Нам, двум упрямым мотылькам... Под парусом вдохнем свободы... И будем мы с тобой легки, И поплывем по небосводу Мы к свету, словно мотыльки... И пусть рассветы и закаты Ещё за тучами пока, Мы их с тобой найдём когд…

❤‍🔥7❤5🕊2custom 54676971382364186081

1 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC36 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

💗💗💗💗💗💗 У этого имени, если честно, нет одного основного цвета. Оно состоит из розовых и коричневых пятен, а ещё оно деревянное. Розовый, разумеется, от буквы "И", а откуда коричневый, сизый и белый — не знаю. С сокращениями вроде Даря или Доря ещё сложнее, потому что там такой необычный градиент, что я даже не знаю, какими словами его описать... В общем, загадочное такое имя) Но вот самое главное и самое первое, ч…

custom 54473034781688028167❤3

27 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC52 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴 Сначала я увидела тёмно-зеленый, потом всмотрелась, и поняла, что фиолетовый тут тоже есть. Зеленый это однозначно "К", а фиолетовый... Ну, наверное, это так смешались "И" и "Л". Если честно, не знаю сокращений для этого имени. Да и они как будто бы не нужны — мне кажется преступлением обрезать такое прекрасное имя. Оно звучит, как какая-то тайна, которую все знают, но забыли об этом. Что-то утерянное, но п…

custom 546769713823641860811❤1

24 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC59 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Это имя для меня почти белое, с "джинсовыми" пятнышками. Буквы "О" и "А" дают белизну, а буква "Г" — затемнение, как такой градиент. А "джинсовая" в этом слове, почему-то, буква "Л"... Но почему — загадка для меня 🤔 Сокращение 🤍🤍🤍 без буквы "Г", а значит, цвет становится чуть менее глубоким, но зато более светлым. Насчёт картинок: я с большим трудом нашла подходящий бумажный цветок 😅 Вот такая эстетика получ…

❤7🥰5custom 54676971382364186081

23 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC84 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Очень рыжее имя) Не знаю, откуда этот оранжевый цвет, но, наверное, от буквы "Л". А ещё само звучание этого имени напоминает мне о воде. В сокращении 🔤🔤🔤🔤 ничего особенно не меняется. Разве что для меня оно звучит более нежно и осторожно, как будто в осеннем лесу кто-то тихонько зовёт: "Лена..." Картинки сами собой подобрались рыжие и осенние. Хотела ещё добавить мандарины, но потом поняла, что это не совсем…

❤5🔥4🥰4❤‍🔥3custom 52332849442765179011custom 54473034781688028161custom 54676971382364186081

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @rifma_v_akvareli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝘈ⲕⲃⲁⲣⲉⲗьⲏⲁя ⲣυⲫⲙⲁ” (@rifma_v_akvareli), 39 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rifma_v_akvareli.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.