5 measurements spanning 22 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 807–853 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 01:25
848
+36
22 Aug 2026, 15:34
812
-9
15 Aug 2026, 13:04
821
-13
8 Aug 2026, 01:21
834
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:48
834
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.13%
avg views ÷ 848 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
62.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
20 (10 June 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
35
Reactions total
22
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 01:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
447 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
109
24.4%
custom 5224374502045011755
94
21.0%
custom 5226726877107864033
88
19.7%
👍
65
14.5%
❤
25
5.59%
custom 5226594695194365579
15
3.36%
😁
13
2.91%
👏
11
2.46%
🤔
8
1.79%
custom 5226954394410438219
6
1.34%
🙏
6
1.34%
custom 5224334971166018892
2
0.447%
💯
2
0.447%
🤝
2
0.447%
👌
1
0.224%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 447 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rieltor_ozhereleva. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ЧТО ДЕЛАТЬ, ЕСЛИ ХОЧЕШЬ СЭКОНОМИТЬ НА СДАЧЕ КВАРТИРЫ, пока соседи не «сдали» тебя в налоговую?
Август - время миграции студентов из-за зачисления в ВУЗы/колледжи, время оформления детей в школу, вследствие чего - активный спрос на аренду.
Большинство собственников хочет сэкономить на налогах от сдачи квартиры.
Сегодня 3 правила для арендодателей*:
✔️ Неочевидный ход для экономии: оформить самозанятость!!!
Где же…
Был негативный опыт работы с риелтором? Расскажи в комментариях
Ко мне клиент пришёл по рекомендации. А перед этим 9 месяцев работал с другим риелтором, продавал квартиру. Пришёл на консультацию, чтобы узнать, что не так😁
А «не так» примерно всё🤦♀
Может не надо летом спасать мир?
Знаю почти всех, кто меня читает. На этом канале мало любителей пустой болтовни. Последнее время вообще хочется закрыться от информационного шума, и я вас прекрасно понимаю.
Вы - взрослые, зрелые люди, которые умеют считать деньги и грамотно анализировать происходящее.
Кто-то меня читает, чтобы получить нужную информацию, кому-то просто нравится, как я пишу. С кем-то знакомы лично,…
«Прогиб» засчитан? Давно не обсуждали с вами новости о ставках (я сейчас не про спорт).
По данным Росреестра за 1-ое полугодие в Москве зарегистрировали более 66 тысяч сделок. А в июне — 11 803 перехода прав. Это на 14% больше, чем в мае, и на 21% выше июня прошлого года.
Рынок не улетел в космос, но он абсолютно живой, плотный и стабильный. Люди просто устали годами сидеть на заборе в ожидании чуда. Жизнь не пост…
Ты бы не открыл дверь в свою новую квартиру в этом году без этого напоминания.
Понимаю, что сейчас твоя голова занята отпуском, летними планами, а не тем самым решающим шагом.
Этим текстом хочу сделать две вещи: на одну минуту затормозить твой бег в ежедневной суете и показать возможность, которая прямо сейчас опять проходит мимо тебя.
✔️Во-первых, напоминаю, что сегодня финальный день приема заявки на мое личное …
Ты тоже любишь помогать людям?
И я такая же. Но иногда это играет злую шутку.
Очень хочется психануть, когда вижу, как умные, состоятельные люди годами «ждут подходящего момента» или сами ковыряются в хитросплетениях сделок.
«Почему вы игнорируете очевидное решение, которое сэкономит вам годы жизни и миллионы рублей?» — вот что крутится у меня в голове, когда я вижу очередной комментарий с сомнением.
Ведь если бы…
У кого-то в руках ключи от новой квартиры, а у тебя - тревога, ожидание, бесконечный поиск информации.
Если думаешь, что «хороший риелтор — это тот, кто берётся за всё подряд, готов работать с каждым встречным и бежать по первому звонку на любой объект», то ты ошибаешься:)
Говорю это уверенно, потому что в самом начале своего пути сама совершала эту ошибку.
Сейчас за плечами 16 лет в недвижимости, юридическое об…
Один человек из этого канала планировал купить квартиру ещё в марте, приходил на консультацию. Но пока «присматривается».
У вас бензин есть? Или он вам не нужен и вас не касается? К сожалению, коснется всех.
Новости читали? Россия планирует импортировать бензин из Индии, Казахстана и Беларуси.
Самая большая проблема здесь это не очереди на заправках, а инфляция. Бензин зашит в себестоимость абсолютно всего: от дос…
Хочешь, чтобы твоя сделка на миллионы была безопасной и прошла «без лишних глаз»?
До работы со мной покупка квартиры — это минное поле. Вы судорожно листаете объявления и интернет в поисках, как вам кажется, нужной информации, или подходящего момента, или боясь пропустить подводные камни. А риелторы из соцсетей норовят выставить ваши лица и бюджеты на «красивую картинку» ради охватов.
После работы со мной вы получа…
Хочу встретиться с тобой, которая планировала купить квартиру к Новому году, но обнаружила себя в середине июля на том же месте. Тебе понравится;) Всего на месяц.
Новый Год наступил и ты снова опоздал. Не веришь? Смотри видео в комментариях.
3 июля была на дне рождения приятельницы, и мы отмечали в клубе. Ровно в 00:00 на танцпол внезапно выходят Деды Морозы со свечами, шампанским, и из колонок гремит: «Новый год …
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rieltor_ozhereleva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
У тебя есть деньги на покупку квартиры. Ну или представь, что они есть, Вселенная всё слышит😉
Что мешает принять решение о покупке?
Не разбираюсь в документах6%
Это долго, у меня нет времени6%
Боюсь, что сделку оспорят и останусь без квартиры и без денег17%
Жду подходящего момента44%
Боюсь купить не то22%
Не нашёл специалиста, которому можно доверить покупку6%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 152,987 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Больше чем риелтор|Ожерельева Марина” (@rieltor_ozhereleva), 848 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rieltor_ozhereleva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
