Channel
@richtrader_channel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
835subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001303008928 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @richtrader_channel |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/richtrader_channel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 835 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 844 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 846 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:19 | 846 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
27 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 40.7% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 25.9% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 22.2% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2025 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎄 Trader Advent — Cell #4 — Why Traders Break in the Middle of the Journey The most dangerous moment in trading is not the beginning and not a deep drawdown. ❗ The most dangerous moment is the middle of the distance. When: you’ve already taken 10–20 trades some are winners, some are losers there is “no result yet” doubt begins to appear This is exactly when traders: start changing strategies start “slightly…
❤2👍2👏1
Hi everyone. Today we’re opening two cells at once — Cell #3 and Cell #4. 🎄 Trader Advent — The Number of Trades and the “Average Outcome” Yes, you heard that absolutely right. This is not a myth — it’s basic trading mathematics. Any strategy, over a sufficient distance, tends toward its average outcome. What does this mean in simple terms? Trade #1 means nothing. Trade #5 also means nothing. Even a series of …
❤2🔥1
Great, let's continue 👌 Trader Advent — Cell No. 2 is open 90% of traders break down on this topic. 📦 Cell #2 — *Win rate ≠ money* Most people think like this: "I need a win rate of 80-90%, then I will earn." This is a mistake. In trading, it is not the win rate that makes money, but the mathematical expectation. Example: — Win rate strategy 55% — Clear rules — Risk control 👉 Such a strategy can be profitabl…
🔥1
Thanks to everyone who posted a reaction. Unfortunately, there are not many reactions, but this is a reason not to open the Advent calendar cells. Today we will open 3 cells with you. And then, if there are more reactions for the first one, we'll start with it and continue with 2, 3, 4 and so on. 🎄 Trader Advent Cell No. 1 — Expectation, probability, and a series of trades Most traders enter the market with the ex…
❤1
🎄 I've come up with a little game for you — Trader Advent Every day I will open one “cell” — there will be a short trading insight inside: about thinking, mistakes, money, discipline and the market. ### 🔢 How we play: You just put a reaction 👇 Each reaction = a cell number. 👍 — cell 1 ❤️ — cell 2 🔥 — cell 3 🥰 — cell 4 👏 — cell 5 😁 — cell 6 👉 Which reaction will gain the most is the cage that we open today. Even…
👍2
🎄 Merry Christmas to you! Let this day be about silence, warmth and people nearby. About the moments when you don't have to rush anywhere and prove something. I would like to wish you simple but important things: — peace of mind inside — a clear head — balanced decisions — and that money comes not through stress, but through the system and patience. Let the markets be clear, the transactions be informed, and the r…
❤2
Why doesn't even a good strategy produce stable results? Most traders only look at the bottom line: plus or minus. But almost no one understands WHY this happened. You can trade for years: — change strategies — add indicators — watch signals and still walk in circles. In the new video, I showed the key point that distinguishes chaotic trading from systemic trading — accounting and analysis of transactions. Not a…
❤1
The same strategy can make a profit... or a loss In the new video, I have shown several deals and their results depending on the fulfillment of certain conditions. I also explained one simple thing that 90% of traders ignore👇 Watch the video and don't forget to like it 👍
❤1👏1
Why even the “perfect” signal often goes into negative territory Sometimes the market gives a clean setup. All the conditions matched. The strategy is “working". Still— it's a minus. In most cases, the reason is not the strategy, but the moment of entry. I DON'T log in if: – the price has already passed the momentum – the entry is “catching up” – the candle closed with a shadow – the market accelerated after confir…
👍1🔥1
Why You Should Ignore 90% of Signals — Even If the Strategy “Works” Many beginners think that if a strategy is good, you can take every signal. In reality, this is the main reason traders lose money. I don’t judge the market by the number of signals — I judge it by the price condition. Here’s a simple checklist I use every day 👇 ❌ I do NOT enter if: – candles have long wicks – PSAR keeps flipping back and forth –…
👍1
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
Why Perfect Signals Work Only for a Few Minutes 📈 Many people think the strategy does everything. But in reality, what matters most is the *entry moment* — that short window when the market is clean, calm, and free from noise or pullbacks. This morning I had two such situations: EMA 200 up → PSAR below the candle → no-shadow candle + price reversal. Below I’ve attached 2 trades from today with a quick breakdown of…
❤1👍1👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @richtrader_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RICH TRADER | Trade Journal” (@richtrader_channel), 835 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/richtrader_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.