Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

RHBDM

@rhbdm_3

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

504subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002021258578
TypeChannel
Username@rhbdm_3
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/rhbdm_3

Growth

5047 Aug 2026, 15:10 — 504 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:16 — 504 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:108 Aug 2026, 04:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 503–505 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 04:16504no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:10504first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 19 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
108
Videos
48
Links
74

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
42m 23s
Average length
10m 36s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

392 reactions across 11 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥11328.8%
🔥9323.7%
287.14%
custom 5208771405549674655276.89%
🤩276.89%
💋225.61%
custom 5195129902222827833184.59%
🕊164.08%
😍153.83%
👍133.32%
🦄102.55%
custom 540936041852096756530.765%
🏆30.765%
💯30.765%
😁10.255%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 392reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2025 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jun 2026, 08:56 UTC367 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Фотоотчёт с RHBDM 9.05.26 - ШЛГБМ Edition от Snaily и Taffifinee. Смотри альбом во Вконтакте. Фулл архив с фото в посте ниже

👍6🏆3

9 Jun 2026, 21:48 UTC≈2,110 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Запомни ты 🫵 сейчас узнаешь, как прошли ×3 года трезвости× Смотри документальный фильм с прошедшего RHBDM 9.05.26 (внезапно - ШЛГБМ Edition) ТАКЖЕ, фильм на Ютуб - https://youtu.be/cEJQqPBEvcE

❤‍🔥15custom 5208771405549674655158😍5🔥4

16 May 2026, 15:58 UTC≈1,240 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Смотри видеоотчёт прямо изнутри тусовки RHBDM 9.05.26 от Дарьи! Запретграм nellytska А большой фильм с мероприятия уже в производстве, жди выхода.

❤‍🔥167🤩6💯3👍2

11 May 2026, 11:16 UTC≈1,600 views55 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Произошёл RHBDM. 9 мая - значимая для нас дата: ✖3 года трезвости✖и 2 года проекту. За 4 дня мы подготовили и выкатили закрытое пати, где присутствовало около 70 трураверов. Всё в лучших традициях реХаба - чай бесплатно, алкоголь - в баре, Hardcore - от души. RHBDM не только про Old School Gabber и верность трезвому курсу, но также и про мотивацию, общение, взаимопомощь, дружбу, отдых🤜🤛 Было приятно слышать что

❤‍🔥27custom 51951299022228278331510💋2custom 52087714055496746551

1 Sept 2025, 07:12 UTC≈2,760 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

1 сентября помни о главном 👆

💋20🔥15👍5🕊3custom 52087714055496746552

9 Jul 2025, 20:33 UTC≈4,010 views77 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Смотри aftermovie с "RHBDM: 1 год проекту" 9.05.25! ❌Дерзость, трезвость и хардкор❌

❤‍🔥37🔥22🤩12custom 51951299022228278333custom 54093604185209675653

5 Jul 2025, 10:54 UTC≈2,350 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @overcore_musicPhoto

Братаны на месте? Короче, там вышел мой новый EP с двумя Oldschool hardcore бэнгерами "Братан, ты габбер!" и "Габберы на месте"! 😎 Жиру альбому добавили True Early Remix на главный трек от Ultarior и две его Uptempo версии от SAW UNION и BGHLNK. Мне нравится результат, получился цельный разьебный релиз, который лично у меня уже на репите на компе!🔥 Слушай на музыкальных платформах: 📱 Spotify 📱 Apple Music 📱 Яндек

🕊8❤‍🔥6🔥3😁1

22 May 2025, 08:13 UTC≈2,410 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Яркий фотоотчёт с "RHBDM: 1 год проекту" 9 мая 2025 от Сергея Зиздок, канал Молодость Всё Простит. 🤩 Смотри в альбоме в ВК или качай в макс качестве по этой ссылке.

🔥18❤‍🔥9🦄9

21 May 2025, 08:03 UTC≈2,570 views51 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Огонь-пожар! 🔥 Принесли aftermovie с хаккой и угаром с недавнего "RHBDM: 1 год проекту" 🤯 Сняла и смонтировала кино Анна Смирнова

🔥31😍10custom 520877140554967465581🕊1

19 May 2025, 14:36 UTC≈1,800 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Добавили фоток с 3-го реХаба в Урбане 28 марта от Jewerlygrish. Смотри в альбоме в ВК

🤩9🕊42🦄1custom 52087714055496746551

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @rhbdm_3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 994,372 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RHBDM” (@rhbdm_3), 504 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rhbdm_3.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.