Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for my guitars trainer has always lauded my fingering ability especially on the G-string

Channel

my guitars trainer has always lauded my fingering ability especially on the G-string

@rfakir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001501405990
TypeChannel
Username@rfakir
CreatedBetween 1 July 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/rfakir

Growth

2437 August 2026 — 4 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–4 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 20:182-2
13 Aug 2026, 06:474no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:004first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 29 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

121 reactions across 5 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53616004552038968171814.9%
custom 53616833394827757661310.7%
custom 5361848511040075801129.92%
custom 5361911939117104326129.92%
custom 6107353566886759671129.92%
custom 5361721594756481512119.09%
custom 6104903215029946267119.09%
custom 6296215927570565905119.09%
custom 6136181898478620111108.26%
custom 613649537096168704397.44%
custom 535080734412296692921.65%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2024 to 8 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Jan 2025, 08:10 UTC≈10,700 views29 reactionsread 13 August 2026

/—Serenity!:😀 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ “LITERATION.. 𝜗𝜚 important /~.” Verse, at its pith, is the craftsmanship of creating words into a ensemble of feelings, contemplations, and encounters redundancy of page. owner 😀 : - first acc : @wakiil/ 1717779498✅ - bot : @virgop_bot ✅ - testi : @felinke ✅ - ch payment : @tunicn ✅ part of 😀 - @upsubsjun as owner 🎸 - @desiora 🎸 work ⏰ weekday

custom 53616004552038968176custom 53616833394827757665custom 53618485110400758013custom 53619119391171043263custom 61361818984786201113custom 62962159275705659053custom 53617215947564815122custom 61073535668867596712

30 Jun 2024, 14:00 UTC≈10,500 views25 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Music is a heartbeat, a pulse, and a love. The first thing you hear as a kid in the womb is your mother's heartbeat, and a pulse is resonant throughout everywhere, through dance music, through rock and roll. Everything you hear has to be a beat on time and that's why you identify with it, because you unite and you hear the heartbeat and you hear the pulse.

custom 53616004552038968174custom 53617215947564815123custom 61049032150299462673custom 61073535668867596713custom 53508073441229669292custom 53618485110400758012custom 53619119391171043262custom 61361818984786201112

30 Jun 2024, 13:57 UTC≈7,770 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

ㅤㅤㅤ解释 : Music imprints itself in the brain deeper than any other human experience. Music brings back the feeling of life when nothing else can.

custom 53616004552038968173custom 53616833394827757663custom 61073535668867596713custom 61364953709616870433custom 53617215947564815122custom 53618485110400758012custom 61049032150299462672custom 61361818984786201112

30 Jun 2024, 13:56 UTC≈5,970 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026

If I have learned anything this year, it's that I won't ever be ready for what life throws at me. I will never be adequately prepared. I won't have the right words when it counts for something. I won't know the right answer when fate itself is staring me down. I've learned I can go on waiting for something, sustained by hope and nothing more, or I can put it to one side and shrug my shoulders. Bravely accept the fac

30 Jun 2024, 11:58 UTC≈3,680 views23 reactionsread 13 August 2026

I don't want your perfect friendship. I don't want neatly wrapped gifts on my birthday and well-spaced coffee dates and a dozen frame-able photos. I want your texts at 3 in the morning when you feel alone. i want to come with you to the grocery store when life gets too busy to catch up. i want you to tell me the truth about how many times you've gone to the bathroom just to catch a breath. I don't want your consis

custom 53616004552038968173custom 53616833394827757663custom 61049032150299462673custom 53617215947564815122custom 53618485110400758012custom 53619119391171043262custom 61073535668867596712custom 61361818984786201112

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @rfakir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jun 2024, 11:33 UTCFinal Results12 voters

XIIQ - You see the most handsome, so what do you think about him

  1. Hot man with sweet smile. Good attitude and i want to be with you rn, can i?0%
  2. Friendly man, look smart and knowing everything topic. Just want stalk cause i want see you.0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2024 to 8 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 242,136 of 1,602,887entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“my guitars trainer has always lauded my fingering ability especially on the G-string” (@rfakir), 2 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rfakir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.