17 Dec 2025, 18:05 UTC≈1,870 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Мы долго шли по этому Пути. Поздравляю! https://t.me/news_kremlin/6881
👍4🤔4❤2🎉2
Channel
Интересные мысли
@rezonans147
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
125subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001347920626 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rezonans147 |
| Description | Канал интересных мыслей |
| Created | 21 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rezonans147 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 125 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 125 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 4
- Videos
- 6
- Links
- 9
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 4m 53s
- Average length
- 1m 38s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
376 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 185 | 49.2% | |
| 👍 | 146 | 38.8% | |
| 🤔 | 16 | 4.26% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 3.19% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 2.13% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 1.06% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.532% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.532% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.266% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 376reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2023 to 17 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
12 Mar 2025, 19:15 UTC≈9,730 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Путин ответил на большое американское шоу личным прибытием в Курскую область в военной форме @rezonans147
👍15💯2
19 Nov 2024, 15:36 UTC≈1,150 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
В связи с последними сообщениями и событиями многие ура-патриоты включили режим паники и критики всех подряд от Лаврова до Пескова. Путина критиковать это конечно слишком палевно. Но все как один отрабатывают вражескую повестку дискредитации нашего руководства и лично Путина. @rezonans147
💯10👍2
24 Aug 2024, 22:07 UTC≈1,310 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Павел Дуров задержан по заказу Пентагона. Не иначе. Все западные спецслужбы работают как прокси для ЦРУ. Сейчас США практически все политические авантюры делают прокси. Это такая маскировка. И на Украине и везде они так делают. Мол мы тут не причём. @rezonans147
💯10😁1
15 Mar 2024, 12:31 UTC≈1,590 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Если враждебный нам Запад хочет, чтобы явка на выборах в России была минимальная, то значит что? Правильно! На выборы! @rezonans147
💯19👍1
13 Mar 2024, 04:23 UTC≈1,320 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Получается, что это была заранее спланированная инсценировка, чтобы напугать Россию? И значит слив разговора и вброс в СМИ тоже часть этой операции? Интересно @rezonans147
👍4💯3🤔2
13 Mar 2024, 04:14 UTC≈1,250 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Это значит, что США понимают, что Украина это территория России по международному праву по итогам Второй мировой войны. @rezonans147
💯9❤1👍1
2 Mar 2024, 06:00 UTC≈9,030 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Немецкий разговор с американским акцентом Когда нужно было раскачивать неприязнь только между русскими и украинцами, то в информационной повестке преобладало понимание, что все теракты организованы только Киевом, а Запад их только поддерживает, не участвуя в организации самого теракта. А теперь, когда руками одной Украины не получается победить Россию, стало необходимо раскачивать взаимную неприязнь между русскими и…
👍22💯2👏1
1 Mar 2024, 13:02 UTC≈1,250 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
И где-то в кабинетах Пентагона тихо аплодирует американский офицер с уверенностью, что вектор ненависти русских сильно сместился с Вашингтона на Берлин. "Смотри кому выгодно" @rezonans147 https://vk.com/@m_s_simonyan-rasshifrovka-razgovora-vysokopostavlennyh-oficerov-bundesver
💯17
22 Feb 2024, 20:02 UTC≈1,240 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video
Путин чётко "байданул", да ещё и сразу после полёта на стратегическом ракетоносце Ту-160М @rezonans147
👍11🔥4👏2
12 Feb 2024, 20:00 UTC≈1,400 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Интервью Путина Карлсону Это интервью, на мой взгляд, неформальный или неформатный переговорный процесс между Россией и США. Мы, патриоты, часто говорим, что переговоры нужны не Россия-Украина, а Россия-США, поскольку Украина полностью подконтрольна США. И как бы там сами украинцы не желали договориться, как например в Стамбуле, но их хозяева в Вашингтоне не дадут этого сделать, потому что у них изначально другой п…
👍11🔥3👏1💯1
31 Jan 2024, 21:30 UTC≈1,040 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Варианты Возможно, этим переходом корневого домена на новый алгоритм воспользовались враги нашего Отечества. Так сказать, бряцают своими сетевыми возможностями, например, перед очередными переговорами или встречами международного формата, чтобы усилить свои переговорные позиции. А возможно, это очередные учения с проработкой сценария внешнего воздействия на рунет. Но кто об этом узнает достоверно, если полная информ…
🤔6👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rezonans147. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 953,927 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Интересные мысли” (@rezonans147), 125 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rezonans147.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.