2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 154–156 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 18:46
155
no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:12
155
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
41.5%
avg views ÷ 155 subscribers
Avg views / post
64.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held
10 (11 June 2026 – 4 August 2026)
Views total
193
Reactions total
27
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
120
Videos
27
Links
9
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
4m 03s
Average length
1m 01s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
137 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
62
45.3%
❤
40
29.2%
👍
17
12.4%
👏
6
4.38%
🏆
5
3.65%
🥰
4
2.92%
😍
2
1.46%
❤🔥
1
0.73%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 10 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rezidomoscow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Фестиваль "ПРО❤️ЛЕТО" Сезоны в Дизайне
Планируем заранее в календаре самый большой летний фестиваль за пределами столицы🔥навстречу уходящему ЛЕТУ☀️
250+ гостей из дизайн-комьюнити Москвы, Питера и других городов (дизайн-студии, арх.бюро, строительные.компании, собственники интерьерных компаний, искусство, архитекторы и дизайнеры)
➡️Для всей семьи, детей😍друзей, партнеров и новых деловых связей.
Формат активного отды…
Не все инновации — это про дорого. Иногда именно они делают дорогой дизайн доступнее.
На этой неделе побывала на презентации ПАН РАСПИЛ. Больше всего меня впечатлило новое оборудование для изготовления фрезерованных ручек на фасадах из ЛДСП и ЛМДФ.
Для большинства это просто технология. Для меня как для дизайнера — возможность создавать кухни, которые выглядят дороже своего бюджета.
Спасибо команде ПАН РАСПИЛ за п…
Теперь официально: я — амбассадор интерьерной выставки «Русский дом» 2026 ❤️
Для меня это не просто красивый статус.
Последние годы я много думаю о том, каким может быть современный русский интерьер. Не стилизованным под прошлое, не собранным из буквальных народных символов, а узнаваемым через отношение к человеку, дому, гостю и повседневной жизни.
Поэтому участие в «Русском доме» для меня особенно важно.
В этом …
Кажется, лучший момент для профессионального роста никогда не наступает.
Всегда что-то мешает: дела, работа, усталость… или, как в моем случае, сломанная неделю назад нога.
Но именно поэтому сегодня я все равно поехала на профессиональную дискуссию «7 заповедей ремонта».
Кстати, всего два дня назад меня объявили бронзовым призером «Битвы дизайнеров», а сегодня уже удалось познакомиться лично с Натальей Преображенс…
Каждый бренд однажды получает свое первое профессиональное признание. Этот день настал для REZIDO.
26 июня я отправила проект DAR18 на конкурс «Битва дизайнеров с Натальей Преображенской».
Из 92 проектов в финал вышли 24.
По итогам защиты DAR18 занял 3 место и получил отдельное признание сразу двух членов жюри — Екатерины Гордон и Алексея Волкова.
Для меня это не просто призовое место.
Это первое независимое подт…
Сегодня защитила проект DAR18.
Когда я начинала работать над этим заданием, думала, что создаю детскую комнату.
Но в какой-то момент поняла, что мне совсем не хочется проектировать интерьер только для четырехлетнего ребенка.
Дети меняются слишком быстро. Сегодня один герой, завтра другой. Меняются увлечения, характер, привычки.
Поэтому вместо комнаты для определенного возраста я решила создать пространство, котор…
Я в «Битве дизайнеров».
Последние несколько недель я практически исчезла из социальных сетей. Всё это время было посвящено конкурсному проекту — детской спальне для младшего сына Екатерины Гордон.
Получив задание, я поймала себя на одной мысли: сегодня интересы детей меняются быстрее, чем мы успеваем пролистать ленту Reels. Поэтому мне не хотелось создавать интерьер вокруг любимого героя или очередного тренда.
Я р…
Я продавала не квадратные метры. Я продавала образ жизни.
Когда я выставила квартиру на продажу, мне говорили:
— Не продашь.
— Дорого.
— За эти деньги в Москве можно купить квартиру бизнес-класса.
И отчасти они были правы.
Особенно учитывая, что речь шла о вторичном рынке, высокой ипотечной ставке и трёхкомнатной квартире.
Но я не хотела снижать цену.
Почему?
Во-первых, локация.
300 метров от метро — не кажда…
❤5🔥4👏3
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @rezidomoscow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 178,681 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“REZIDO — инвестдизайн квартир” (@rezidomoscow), 155 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rezidomoscow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.