Channel
@rezajahanshahiir
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
237subscribers
+62 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002356783158 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rezajahanshahiir |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rezajahanshahiir |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 237 | +8 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 229 | +19 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:27 | 210 | +17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 193 | +3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 190 | +12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 178 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 178 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 175 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
139 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 79 | 56.8% | |
| 👍 | 27 | 19.4% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 5.76% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 4.32% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 2.16% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.16% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 2.16% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 1.44% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 1.44% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.719% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.719% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.719% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.719% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.719% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.719% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سلسله دورهمیهای مجازی 🚀 ۱۰ دقیقه با یک پژوهشگر | هر جمعه، یک تجربه، یک قدم جلوتر 🎙 جلسه اول | از ایده تا عنوان پژوهش در نخستین جلسه درباره این موضوع صحبت میکنیم: 🔎 چگونه موضوع پژوهشی پیدا کنیم و چگونه عنوان مناسب برای پژوهش انتخاب کنیم؟ اما قرار نیست یک کلاس تئوری داشته باشیم! قرار است تجربه کسی را بشنویم که خودش این مسیر را طی کرده است؛ 🌟 مهمانان ویژه این جلسه: 👩🏻🏫 پروفسور لیلا جویباری رئیس دانشکده پرستاری و مام…
❤7
جملاتی که نباید در مقاله چه به فارسی چه به انگلیسی استفاده کنید... 🚫🩺 #جملات_ممنوعه : پارت چهاردهم 🚫 14. There was no adverse effect. عدم مشاهده عارضه در مطالعه، به معنای عدم وجود عارضه نیست. ❌ ممکن است حجم نمونه یا مدت پیگیری کافی نبوده باشد. به جاش میتونید بنویسید: ✍️ No adverse events were observed during the follow-up period. or No treatment-related adverse events were reported in this study. 🔗@rjahanshahi…
❤4
📚 اصطلاحات مهم پژوهش #اصطلاحات_پژوهشی : پارت پنجم 🔹 DOI (Digital Object Identifier) کد DOI یک شناسه دائمی برای مقالات علمی است. ✅ حتی اگر آدرس سایت مجله تغییر کند، DOI همیشه مقاله را پیدا میکند. 📌 مثال: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.01.015 ⚠️ نکته مهم: در رفرنسنویسی، درج DOI باعث میشود مقاله راحتتر پیدا شود و بسیاری از ژورنالها آن را الزامی میدانند. 🔗@rjahanshahi 👤 🌐 Channel 🪔
❤4
جملاتی که نباید در مقاله چه به فارسی چه به انگلیسی استفاده کنید... 🚫🩺 #جملات_ممنوعه : پارت سیزدهم 🚫 13. Patients responded well to treatment. عبارت responded well مبهم است و معیار مشخصی ندارد. ❌ پاسخ درمانی باید با شاخصهای قابل اندازهگیری گزارش شود. به جاش میتونید بنویسید: ✍️ Patients showed a significant reduction in symptom scores. or Clinical improvement was observed according to predefined outcome measures. …
❤5👍1
این مقاله رو یادتونه که گفتم دوستان بردن ارائه دادن، خواستم شما رو در حال خوب شریک کنم 😊: بالاخره پذیرش گرفت 🎉: مجله Scientific Reports ایمپکت فکتور IF=4.9 📈 این مقاله نشون میده که کاراتون رو دست کم نگیرید 🚫، یک مقاله مقطعی هم فقط نیازه که خوب گزارش بشه و اصول رو رعایت کنه ✨ یک نکته هم باید در نظر بگیریم یک سال طول کشید تا فرایندها رو طی کنه در نظر داشته باشید که مجلات با نمایه پایینتر قبلاً ریجکت کرده بودنش، ول…
🎉8❤2🔥2🍌1
به قول یکی از رفقا، درود و نور ✨🙏 قصد داریم چند دورهمی مجازی یک ساعته (شاید یکم بیشتر) برگزار کنیم که راجب پروپوزال 📝، مقاله 📄 و پایاننامه نویسی 🎓 هست. روزهای برگزاری رو هم جمعه 🗓️ در نظر میگیریم و روی ساعتش باهم همفکری میکنیم ⏰. در این دورهمی سعی میکنیم هرکس تجربه خودش رو در اون زمینه بگه 💬 و از دوستانم که در این زمینهها تجربه دارند هم دعوت میکنم که شرکت کنند 👥. پلتفرمش گوگل میت 🖥️ یا بله 📱 میشه باید نظرسنجی …
👍17❤1🍓1👎1💯1
Voice message, posted without a caption
👍3❤1
محیط کار نرم افزار Amos رو مشاهده میکنید که برای مدل سازی خیلی خوبه برای تحلیل عامل تاییدی یا برای مطالعاتی که مدلهای میانجی گری و ... دارند. و یک نکته ای رو در یادگیری نرمافزارها بهتون بگم که وقتتون رو تلف نکنید (ویس پایین رو چک کنید 👇) 🔗 @rjahanshahi 👤 🌐 Channel 🪔
❤4
📚 آشنایی با استایلهای رفرنسنویسی #رفرنس_نویسی : پارت چهارم 🔹 AMA Style (American Medical Association) یکی از استایلهای معتبر در مجلات پزشکی آمریکاست. 🇺🇸 ✅ ارجاع در متن به صورت شماره است. ✅ قوانین دقیقی برای نام نویسندگان، DOI، کتابها و مقالات دارد. ✅ فهرست منابع بر اساس ترتیب استناد مرتب میشود. 📌 نمونه در فهرست منابع: Smith J, Brown P. Title of the article. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024;15(2):120-126.…
❤5
راهکاری برای بهبود ارائه و صحبت در جمع ...
❤4
Video message, posted without a caption
❤7👍1
متاآنالیز و بقیه آنالیزها 📊 رفقا یک سایتی هست به آدرس https://reeplee.com/ این سایت میاد اکسل یا CSV ازتون میگیره 📄، بعد بهش میگید چی لازم دارید، براتون انجام میده آنالیز رو، با نرم افزار R 💻. چالش اینه که رایگانش کمه و کمترین قیمت برای یک ماهش میشه ۹ دلار (حدودا بگو ۲ میلیون تومن) 💸. حالا یک نکته ای داره، شما میتونید کد R رو هم ازش دانلود کنید 💾. این کد کجا بدرد میخوره؟ 🤔 احسنت، یک بار تمام آنالیز های ممکن رو …
❤4✍1👍1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @rezajahanshahiir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“پژوهشگرشو | رضا جهانشاهی” (@rezajahanshahiir), 237 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rezajahanshahiir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.