Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Отзывы VEL

Channel

Отзывы VEL

@reviews_vel

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003270102311
TypeChannel
Username@reviews_vel
DescriptionОтзывы от наших пользователей о турнирах, розыгрышах и пополнениях Steam.
Created4 November 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/reviews_vel

Growth

9109.57 August 2026 — 9 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 5 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–10 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:0110no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:3010+1
7 Aug 2026, 16:339first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

8 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥337.5%
👏225.0%
🆒112.5%
🏆112.5%
👍112.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2025 to 19 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Jan 2026, 16:50 UTC118 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

спасибо за турнир, моментально выплатили призовые, мап пул карт ущербный это единственный минус турнира.

🆒1

29 Dec 2025, 20:27 UTC129 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

@Valutix_manager просто лучшее место чтобы пополнить стим, маленькая комиссия, быстрый доход средств, выгоднее чем на любом другом маркете

👏1

5 Dec 2025, 19:17 UTC170 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

The tournament was excellent, great prize pool and fast, efficient support.

🏆1

25 Nov 2025, 21:29 UTC158 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Спасибо большое за вашу работу. Вы всегда исправно и с малой комиссией отправляете деньги на Стим, причем как в тенге так и в рублях. А еще вы очень отзывчивые, ещё раз благодарю вас за то что помогли разобраться при моей ошибке в переводе. 😅😅😜😊😊

🔥1

22 Nov 2025, 22:21 UTC138 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Все замечательно! Очень быстро Даже на маленькую сумму Спасибо платформе

👏1

15 Nov 2025, 20:41 UTC122 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Один из немногих оставшихся турнирных операторов, за что отдельное спасибо. Быстрые ответы админов. Отличная организация, великолепный каст

🔥1

14 Nov 2025, 21:04 UTC103 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Спасибо за проведение турнира, отлично провели время, жаль проиграли 👍

👍1

14 Nov 2025, 20:18 UTC91 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Все прошло без проблем, деньги на стим упали быстро

🔥1

14 Nov 2025, 19:56 UTC82 viewsread 12 August 2026

Спасибо за помощь! Всё пришло, еще обращусь

14 Nov 2025, 17:41 UTC78 viewsread 12 August 2026

Пополнял стим для покупки ивента в доте. Пополнял 1200, а комиссию взяли всего 36 рублей. При чем деньги на баланс пришли через минуту👍🏻 ответили очень быстро и пополнили также оперативно, спасибо❤️

9 Nov 2025, 12:23 UTC75 viewsread 12 August 2026

все очень классно и быстро, комиссия нулевая, лутайте, пока не прошли выходные!

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @reviews_vel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 202,693 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Отзывы VEL” (@reviews_vel), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reviews_vel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.