Channel
@review_en
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
550subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001256363577 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @review_en |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/review_en |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 550 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 548 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 548 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (31 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 816 |
| Reactions total | 47 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
47 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 18 | 38.3% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 31.9% | |
| 🙏 | 14 | 29.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📁#Infographics: Uzbekistan's Trade with CIS Countries in January-Juine 2026 📍In January-June 2026, the CIS countries accounted for 37.8% of the foreign trade turnover of the Republic of Uzbekistan. ✔️The foreign trade turnover of the Republic of Uzbekistan with the CIS countries in January-June this year increased by 32.4% and amounted to $15.5 billion ◼️exports – $6.6 bn (+50.4%) ◼️imports – $8.9 bn (+21.6%) ✔️T…
👍2👏1🙏1
📊 #Infographics: Uzbekistan's Trade with Central Asian Countries in January-June 2026 📈 By the end of January-June 2026, the volume of Uzbekistan's foreign trade with Central Asian countries reached $4.4 billion, which is 10.8% of the total volume of foreign trade. ➡️ Exports amounted to $1.6 billion (+26.8%) ⬅️ Imports amounted to $2.8 million (+26.3%) 📊 The largest share in Uzbekistan's trade turnover with Centr…
👍1👏1🙏1
📊#Infographics: Uzbekistan's foreign trade in January-May 2026 📶Uzbekistan's foreign trade turnover in January-May 2026 amounted to $32.8 billion (+3.7%) ➡️Exports in foreign trade turnover amounted to $12.7 billion ✔️In the structure of exports, goods amounted to $8.1 billion and services to $4.6 billion ⬅️Imports in foreign trade amounted to $20.1 billion (+20.8%) ✔️In particular, goods were imported for $18 b…
👍2👏1🙏1
(continuation) In trade, the most realistic growth potential lies at the intersection of Afghanistan’s already established demand and Uzbekistan’s competitive capabilities. The goal of increasing trade turnover first to $3 billion and then to $5 billion is achievable through a transition to joint production. A simple scaling up of the current export model from Uzbekistan will be limited by Afghanistan’s effective de…
👍1👏1🙏1
(continuation) In recent years, trade ties have intensified significantly. The parties adopted a preferential trade agreement, which provides for the abolition of import duties on 14 commodity categories. Uzbekistan’s trade houses have been opened in Kabul and Mazar-i-Sharif. In Surkhandarya region, on the border with Afghanistan, the Ayritom Free Zone has been launched and is successfully operating, combining trade…
👍1👏1🙏1
(continuation) The period of 2021–2025 was quite uneven in trade relations with Afghanistan. In 2021, bilateral trade decreased by 13.5% compared to 2020 due to political uncertainty in Afghanistan, restrictions in payment infrastructure, and logistical risks. However, starting in 2022, a consistent recovery began: trade turnover grew by 13–14% annually in 2022–2023, by 31.2% in 2024, and by 47.7% in 2025. . Over fi…
👍1👏1🙏1
🇺🇿🇦🇫Trade and Economic Cooperation between Uzbekistan and Afghanistan in 2021–2025 CERR analyzed Uzbekistan’s trade and investment cooperation with Afghanistan in 2021–2025, as well as promising areas for cooperation. Uzbek-Afghan economic relations have become stable and multifaceted in recent years, covering trade, energy, transport and logistics, industrial cooperation, agriculture, and the development of minera…
👍1👏1🙏1
What to Read This Weekend⁉️ 3️⃣ perspectives on how states compete for influence in the world: 📖 Halford Mackinder is regarded as one of the founding fathers of geopolitics and the doctrine of Atlanticism. According to his interpretation, the democratic Sea Powers, which uphold the principles of free trade, stand in opposition to the Land Powers, which reject free trade. Mackinder was therefore among the first to …
👏1
(continuation) 🔝Real estate market activity in the first half of 2026 In the first half of 2026, the total number of real estate purchase and sale transactions exceeded 171,000, up 25.3% compared with the same period last year. In absolute terms, the increase amounted to 34,500 transactions. During the period under review, an increase in the number of real estate purchase and sale transactions was recorded across a…
👍1👏1🙏1
(continuation) 🔝Real Estate Market Activity in June 2026 Compared with May of this year, the highest growth rates were recorded in Bukhara (50.1%), Navoi (41.5%), and Samarkand (31.8%) regions. More moderate growth rates were observed in Andijan (17.9%), Tashkent (12.2%), and Khorezm (0.9%) regions. In year-on-year terms, the highest growth rates were recorded in the city of Tashkent (35.7%), Syrdarya (26.9%) and …
👍1👏1🙏1
🏠Uzbekistan’s Real Estate Market Ends the First Half of the Year with Stable Growth The number of real estate purchase and sale transactions in the first half of the year increased by more than a quarter compared with the same period last year. 📊Activity in the real estate market increased noticeably in 2026. Following a correction in April and May after the March peak, the number of transactions rose again in June…
👍1👏1🙏1
🖥 Media_about_us An article by Edvard Romanov, Chief Research Fellow at the Center for Economic Research and Reforms, has been published, focusing on the dynamics of Uzbekistan’s trade, economic, and investment cooperation with the countries of Central Asia and Azerbaijan over the past nine years. 🔝The article was featured by: ✅ "SEE" (Egypt) ✅ Alliance Press News Agency (Kyrgyzstan) ✅ Embassy of Uzbekistan in Paki…
👍2👏1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @review_en. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 356,779 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Review.uz/en - Economic Review” (@review_en), 550 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/review_en.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.