꧁༺ 𝓼𝓱𝓮 𝓵𝓸𝓸𝓴𝓼 𝓳𝓾𝓼𝓽 𝓪 𝓭𝓻𝓮𝓪𝓪𝓶 ༻꧂ #art #palette

Channel
˚⊱reveri⊰˚
@reverriart
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003844120537 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reverriart |
| Created | 15 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reverriart |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 7 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 7 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 446.7%
- avg views ÷ 7 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 31.3
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 11.5%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (15 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 469 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 15
- Links
- 5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 3 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 4 | 36.4% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 27.3% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 27.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖для творчества 8,5к @piarchatartist Пиар разрешен для всего, бана нет Лучшая подборка для художника: ➡️Бесплатный пиар и арт коммьюнити 12к @piarhydozh ➡️Продвижение начинающих художников @artpiarr ➡️ Чаты самопиара ➡️Баттлы артов @otsenkaart ➡️Арт интерактивы, пиар ваших ивентов @artivent ➡️Арт коммьюнити и пиар для нсфв художников 18+ @kotenky АВТОР ОБЛОЖКИ @mamagdt
рисую на палитру!! #art #WIP
what makes this fragile world go 'round? #art
реакций!!
𝕹𝖊 𝖕𝖎𝖑𝖎 𝖒𝖊𝖓𝖞𝖆 𝖛𝖟𝖌𝖑𝖞𝖆𝖉𝖔𝖒 𝖘𝖛𝖔𝖎𝖒, 𝕿𝖞 𝖛𝖊𝖉 𝖘𝖆𝖒 𝖛𝖉𝖗𝖚𝖌 𝖐𝖔𝖓𝖈𝖆 𝖕𝖔𝖟𝖍𝖊𝖑𝖆𝖑. 𝕻𝖔𝖗𝖔𝖈𝖍𝖓𝖞𝖞 𝖐𝖗𝖚𝖌 𝖗𝖆𝖟𝖔𝖗𝖛𝖆𝖑 𝖙𝖞 𝕾𝖑𝖔𝖛𝖔𝖒 𝖘𝖚𝖍𝖎𝖒, 𝖁𝖊𝖉 𝖒𝖔𝖎𝖍 𝖘𝖈𝖍𝖊𝖐 𝖒𝖔𝖐𝖗𝖔𝖙𝖞 𝖓𝖊 𝖛𝖎𝖉𝖆𝖑. 𝖁𝖒𝖎𝖌 𝖔𝖇𝖗𝖚𝖘𝖍𝖎𝖑𝖔𝖘 𝖉𝖓𝖔 𝖚 𝖒𝖊𝖓𝖞𝖆 𝕻𝖔𝖉 𝖓𝖔𝖌𝖆𝖒𝖎, 𝕷𝖎𝖘𝖍 𝖔𝖘𝖐𝖔𝖑𝖐𝖎 𝖘𝖔𝖛𝖒𝖊𝖘𝖙𝖓𝖞𝖍 𝖁𝖔𝖘𝖕𝖔𝖒𝖎𝖓𝖆𝖓𝖎𝖞 𝕶𝖗𝖔𝖛𝖞𝖆 𝖛 𝖒𝖔𝖊𝖞 𝖐𝖔𝖟𝖍𝖊 - 𝖘𝖙𝖆𝖓𝖚𝖙 𝕽𝖚𝖇𝖈𝖆𝖒𝖎. 𝕹𝖆𝖛𝖊𝖈𝖍𝖓𝖔 𝖐𝖑𝖊𝖞𝖒𝖔𝖒 𝖓𝖊𝖑𝖊𝖕𝖞𝖍 𝕿𝖊𝖟𝖗𝖆𝖓𝖎𝖞. наконец-то дошли силы закончить этот автопортрет 120 часов из-за своей лени его рисовала репостики пожалуйста 🌹
я, если что, не забросила 𝄞 #art #WIP
°+*:ꔫ:*+゚ коллаб с этим НАИЧУДЕСНЕЙШИМ человечком! кликабельно #collab #art
.𖥔 ݁♫ Набор на палитры.𖥔 ݁♫ 🐙: Суть ивента: нарисовать работу в выбранной вами палитре.. જ⁀➴Условия: 1) подписка на @shizukaa_228 2) репост к себе в тгк/в пиар чат по желанию 3) кинуть свою анкету Анкета: • ваш юз • ссылка на тгк • номер палитры, которую хотите • несколько примеров работ и пруф репоста Места в палитре: 1) 0/8 2) 0/8 3) 2/8 4) 1/8 Дедлайн на отрисовку работы — 3 недели Набор до 1 августа .𖥔 ݁˖П…
⋆.ೃ࿔*:・ отзыв уже на месте! #commission #art
Antonella Marifiardet 🏵🇨🇴 for she !! #art #request
❤1👍1🔥1
активно думаю над дизайном маскота.. удивительно, что в диджитал... #art #WIP
🔥2🥰2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @reverriart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 519,457 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@artivent · 6261 postНачинающие творцы CF
@artpiarr · 3,5531 post𝒜ᥒ𝗍᥆ᥒᥱᥣᥣ𝐚's ᥴᥣ𝕠sᥱ𝗍! [𝘾🄾𝙈𝙈𝙎 𝒪𝙋𝙀𝙉]
@castillolover · 151 postПсихонестабильность
@kotenky · 1721 postGYEiRA 💥📀🚯⬦
@mamagdt · 801 post🎨 ART Battles | VR
@otsenkaart · 1,4731 postART Community | Пиар художников
@Piarhydozh · 12,3031 post.𖥔 ݁ ˖ sʜɪᴢᴜᴋᴀ..🐙
@shizukaa_228 · 1491 postТгк/ ноунейм под именем шримпо😛😛
@spermatojiiiii · 291 postvrowix art РЕСТ
@vrowixx · 3381 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“˚⊱reveri⊰˚” (@reverriart), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reverriart.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.