Channel
@reticvee
On this record: Topic Β· Observations Β· Channels linked by matching posts Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
303subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003754305410 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reticvee |
| Description | Admin Bebas Promosi Asal No send Celah Ban Channel Ya |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reticvee |
Hacking & security β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (qwen3.6:35b-a3b, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 15 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramβs forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @Rectivee/385314 Nov 2026, 11:19 UTC | @reticvee/4500 Β· this entry14 Nov 2026, 11:19 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Rectivee | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @Rectivee (4β1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp β in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
βPublished firstβ means first in this corpus. We hold 10 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 November 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detectorβs own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @Rectivee. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through β we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. βFirstβ could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channelβs history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a βForwarded fromβ credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying β a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story β and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Nov 2026, 15:22 | 303 | no change |
| 14 Nov 2026, 14:47 | 303 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 14 November 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (14 November 2026 β 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 26 |
| Reactions total | β |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 15:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 14 November 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegramβs own βeditedβ marker: 0 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before β this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
π OLA GW ABY, DISINI GW MAU KASIH LIAT SEMUA PRODUK YANG GW JUAL, CLICK PRODUK UNTUK MELIHATβ - ο»ΏJASA UP TELPREM - STUDENT BANS TELEGRAM - ADMIN CHANNEL - MARGA XVANESCT - JASA SUNTIK CH/GB - MURSUN - MURTAG - JASA GIFT PAYMENT READY : DANA + QRIS contact @vzaabi channel @shoptgaby bot limit @abilimit_bot
Signed Foresct a. Eternalis
Posted without readable text
Signed Foresct a. Eternalis
Ada Yang Mau Di Buatin Bot Token Prem Ga? Kalo Mau Pv aja
Signed Sedia Kucing Sebelum Hujan
MASUK AJA KAK ASAL JANGAN PROMOSI OR DDOS https://t.me/+xA4VlpJvz6s4NWI1
Signed Sedia Kucing Sebelum Hujan
Posted without readable text
Signed Foresct a. Eternalis
π Discount Tangan Kanan Lyra Hanya Di 6k Saja Benef? Click Bawah π π TAP UNTUK MELIHAT BENEFIT π DM @PrimeLyraa π πTersisa -1 Slot Lagi Untuk Pas In
Signed βΝΝΝΝπππππ @Cr1m1nals
Waspada terhadap sampah Username : @maklowcolmaxxxx Ch : https://t.me/ssanbasebyfebz Tg Message : tg://openmessage?user_id=8698112401 Kronologi? Tadi ada yang anomim di ch @allscbymarxx > https://t.me/allscbymarxx/2224 trus dia komen Hbis itu Pas Di cek prof Nya ternyata Dia Jual Base Dari ch Orang, Ngemis, Ga Modal, idiot, Yatim Piatu. Note :Waspada Ama Ni OrangπΉ Ban ae Ketika Ada Di Gb Murbase/Ch Share Base Kalianβ¦
Signed Sedia Kucing Sebelum Hujan
Posted without readable text
Signed Foresct a. Eternalis
wts noktel repe + id 8 rapih DC 4 beranting bergif - limper show? @memekpecah wts noktel Kuwait nominus sup ctc chat @vzaaby
Signed Foresct a. Eternalis
Fs Noktel >@Hatters99K (Id 5 dc 5, Nominus, Login Mnyanmar, berbenefit, pp π, surel on) price 10k >@GwSuki (Id 6 dc 5, Limper, Login Tiongkok/China, pp π, surel on) price 10k >@ClaimCil (Id 1 dc 5, Nominus, Login Indo, ppπ§‘, Surel On) Price 15k >@Kahksgka (Id 1 dc 5, Nominus, Log Indo, pp π©·, Surel On) price 16k >@Pvgwe (Id 8 dc 4, Nominus, Log Algeria/+213, pp π, Surel On) price 8k Nego? Dm aja
Signed Sedia Kucing Sebelum Hujan
fs acc gw ini edisi gnti acc benef? admin bnyak group free kepemilikan gb market banyak admin ch gift 2 role di apk bug base-base gacor msuk all project gw bnyak kenalan pemes jier acc gntg siap pakeπ€ prem masih 2 mingguan balance grams 0.1 nft dan usn trial ampe decemberπΏ price? 85 nego tipis minat dm @promotiongue
Signed οΏ΄οΏ΄οΏ΄ οΏ΄ οΏ΄οΏ΄οΏ΄ οΏ΄ οΏ΄ οΏ΄ οΏ΄ οΏ΄ οΏ΄οΏ΄οΏ΄ οΏ΄οΏ΄οΏ΄οΏ΄ οΏ΄ οΏ΄οΏ΄οΏ΄ οΏ΄ οΏ΄ οΏ΄ οΏ΄οΏ΄ οΏ΄οΏ΄οΏ΄ γ β @pftvy
nyari grub bebas promosi? π @basenumeroaby nyari grub bebas promosi? π @basenumeroaby nyari grub bebas promosi? π @basenumeroaby nyari grub bebas promosi? π @basenumeroaby
Signed Foresct a. Eternalis
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @reticvee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπΈπππππππ!ππ π½ππππβ (@reticvee), 303 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reticvee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.