Channel
@rethinkingoverthinking
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
259subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002173578878 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rethinkingoverthinking |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rethinkingoverthinking |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 259 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 258 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 258 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (5 July 2026 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 168 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
55 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 81.8% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 7.27% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 7.27% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 3.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
История в духе названия канала: как-то я подумала, что мне негде тренироваться выступать, и запустила лабораторию выступлений внутри сообщества «все свои». На первой встрече мы делали выступления на свободные темы в рамках 5 минут, а в эту среду будем отрабатывать интро. После переезда и работы в связи с ним, мне бывает сложно найти слова, кто я, потому что большая часть моей идентичность держалась на работе. Но это…
❤3
🌹 Рассказать о себе так, чтобы тебя запомнили – это навык. В июне провели первую встречу лаборатории публичных выступлений. Участницы говорили про аналоговые хобби, важность игры и осуществление желаний – по 5 минут каждая. ⚡22 июля в 19:00 по МСК встречаемся снова: будем учиться представляться и рассказывать о себе. Присоединяйтесь к сообществу, чтобы попасть на встречу.
🔥4❤🔥2
Обсуждали расставания в дружбе, которые происходят по нашей инициативе, по инициативе нашего друга или как будто сами по себе. Знаю, что эти истории есть в жизни каждого человека и мы жвием с ними, периодически вспоминая, и это вызывает много разных чувств ❤️🩹
❤6
Мы больше не друзья! Говорим про расставания в дружбе ❤️🩹 Дружба тоже может разбить сердце. При этом мы часто слышим про романтические расставания, в то время как дружеские проживаем в одиночестве. В новом выпуске говорим о том, почему чаще всего мы перестаем дружить, делимся личным опытом, и рассказываем, как себя поддержать. Что делать, если дружба закончилась? Как пережить открытый конфликт или молчаливое отдал…
❤7💔4
Открываю для себя сюрреалистов: начала с двух лекций про художников и художниц, а потом вспомнила, что скоро закончится выставка Леоноры Каррингтон. Я люблю готовиться к выставкам, а сейчас в этом для меня еще больше смысла из-за языка. Дома я смотрю и читаю на русском и английском, на выставке – на французском, так уже есть какой-то контекст и нет фрустрации, что ничего не понятно. В истории Леоноры много интересн…
❤15
Воскресная рекомендация для всех, влюбленных в Париж и только желающих влюбиться (не сделать этого будет невозможно) – подкаст Париж наяву. Короткие зарисовки, сплетение повествований настоящего и прошлого, атмосферные звуки на фоне (прямо как сейчас, когда я печатаю этот пост с открытым окном, и мои соседи по колодцу готовят, моют посуду, общаются и играют на флейте). Мне всегда интересно изучать контект мест, где…
❤14
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @rethinkingoverthinking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Устала думать, буду делать” (@rethinkingoverthinking), 259 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rethinkingoverthinking.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.