Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

re.Search

@research_dyor

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

359subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001316120527
TypeChannel
Username@research_dyor
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/research_dyor

Growth

340359349.56 August 2026 — 340 subscribers6 August 2026 — 352 subscribers6 August 2026 — 352 subscribers14 August 2026 — 359 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 337–362 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 17:33359+7
6 Aug 2026, 21:17352no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:44352+12
6 Aug 2026, 09:20340first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
45.0%
avg views ÷ 359 subscribers
Avg views / post
162
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (25 November 20256 August 2026)
Views total1,131
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3858.5%
🔥1929.2%
46.15%
🤯46.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 November 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC159 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В чем сила главной NFT коллекции Lighter - Fuego Многие думают о том, что Fuego NFT это очередная NFT коллекция без внутренней ценности. Это не так. Модель Fuego состоит в другом - они закрывают важную часть любой биржи - торговые соревнования. Благодаря Fuego, Lighter получает постоянный движок привлечения новых трейдеров. Почти все PerpDEXs за редким исключением стимулируют торговые соревнования через заработок

🤯4

5 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC171 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Следующий большой PerpDEX после Hyperliquid и Lighter. Я долго искал следующий проект, который может сделать большую историю в этом секторе. Пока многие воодушевлены Variational - я искал другой, более фундаментальный продукт. Это RiseX. Я знаю этих ребят уже больше 2-х лет и внимательно следил за их развитием. То, что они сделали с точки зрения технологии - просто потрясающе, но большинство этого еще не видит. Мо

👍8🔥2

4 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC182 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Как @wallet научился зарабатывать приличную выручку благодаря Lighter Прошло ровно 4 месяца с момента интеграции Lighter в Telegram Wallet. За это время выручка wallet составила $3.1M - примерно $800k/месяц. В годовом выражении это больше $9M ARR. Lighter за это время заработал $100k или $300k в годовом выражении. И эти результаты были получены при ежедневном числе активных трейдеров (DAU) составляющем 3,000 - 4,0

3🔥2

3 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC113 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Почему мне не нравится Vaiational и я не делаю ставку на него вдолгую 1. это простая RFQ биржа (request-for-quote), главная ценность которого — активы «длинного хвоста» (long-tail assets) 2. такие проекты, как Lighter или Hyperliquid, создают инфраструктуру для торговли и обеспечения ликвидности, тогда как Variational просто маршрутизирует сделки на централизованные биржи (CEX) и берет ликвидность оттуда 3. Variat

👍61

23 Jul 2026, 10:30 UTC239 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Options on Robinhood through Lighter Главное что я услышал в последнем интервью фаундера Lighter (и он подтвердил это во внутреннем OG чате) - он сказал что ключевым партнерством между Robinhood и Lighter станет переход исполнения опционов с Robinhood на Lighter. Это цель, к которой стремятся обе компании. Почему? Robinhood это лидирующий опцион брокер, который обрабатывает примерно 300 миллионов контрактов в меся

👍1

10 Jul 2026, 13:16 UTC321 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Polymarket Perps - extract not innovate. Why it's not competitor for Lighter & Hyperliquid Я понимаю откуда возник такой большой ажиотаж вокруг Polymarket Perps, но для меня очевидно что это Tier-С биржа. Можно назвать Tier-B исключительно из-за бренда, но не более того. Polymarket Perps не придумало ничего нового, они просто используют свою существующую аудиторию для дополнительной монетизации. Их технология - это

👍5

19 Feb 2026, 18:07 UTC274 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сектор PerpDEX на грани adoption Я изучил цифры и обнаружил, что текущие показатели сопоставимы с показателями CEX в 2019-2020 годах. С 2021 года CEX стал крупнейшим cash cow в Web3. PerpDEX ждет то же самое. Если применить к ним динамику CEX, то к 2030 году сектор PerpDEX вырастет в 8x. Еще не поздно сделать ставку. Мою ставку вы знаете - пока что только LIT

👍4

19 Feb 2026, 09:08 UTC218 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Тот кто говорит что мета PerpDEX закончена - ошибается Постоянно слышу, что фармить PerpDEX уже нет смысла. Вы категорически не правы - только этим и стоит заниматься. Трейдинг - это база капитализма и один из столпов всей финансовой системы, где биржи выполняют роль "продавцов лопат". В Web3 мире именно трейдинг являлся первым и основным юзкейсом. Первые криптобиржи появились еще на заре индустрии в 2011 году и у

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @research_dyor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 157,604 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“re.Search” (@research_dyor), 359 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/research_dyor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.