🌟🌟︎ ︎ ︎⎯࣭ׄ⎯ Ratio & Vor🎀 Cf 🤍 🤩 🤩⏜ ❄️ ₎ HSR.com ꒱ 🌳 😈отите увидеть интересный ос/канон с Доктором Рацио из Хонкай Стар Рейл или вам интересна динамика "Непризнанный гений" и "Признанный гений"🤍 🤩𝔀𝐞𝐥𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 . . . 🤩🤩 🤩🫥🥹🤩ortio 𝐝𝐚𝐢𝐥𝐲 & 𝐜𝐟🥹🌟🥹

Channel
✧ 。Rᴇrllis ᴀrᴄhivᴇ ⁺⟢
@rerirsfiancee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
39subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003745268094 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rerirsfiancee |
| Description | 𝘐 𝘳𝘦𝘨𝘳𝘦𝘵 𝘰𝘯𝘭𝘺 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘯𝘨 - 𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘴𝘦 500 𝘺𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘸𝘦’𝘷𝘦 𝘭𝘰𝘴𝘵 . 🩸 🕯️ |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 23 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rerirsfiancee |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 39 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 39 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 154.5%
- avg views ÷ 39 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 60.3
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 16.9%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (23 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 482 |
| Reactions total | 53 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 13
- Links
- 28
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
121 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5411328883637132337 | 32 | 26.4% | |
| 🕊 | 28 | 23.1% | |
| custom 5416008478139389967 | 26 | 21.5% | |
| custom 5404479531786475912 | 22 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5269255638977912211 | 10 | 8.26% | |
| 🆒 | 3 | 2.48% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🩵🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🎁Вас стало наконец 200 подписчиков, за что я вам безумно благодарна и я решила провести конкурс на своем канале и связанный с Вёрфлинсами! 🤍🥬🥬🥬🥬🥬 🤍 В каждой категории отдельные призы, т.е будет максимум 16 победителей! Вы можете участвовать как в одной категории, так и во всех, ограничений нет 🩵Для Художников 1 место: 2000 рублей/донат в игру/донат в Стим/1370 звёздочек/покупка мерча вам по данной сумме в …
🤩🤩 _🐈⬛ —.#rnd 🍼🍼₊⠀ ࣪🌙🌙🌙 ⭐️⭐️⭐️🌙 🎀. 🌟🕯️🕯️🕯️🕯️🗝 . 𐂯 🕯️🕯️ _Сᴇʍᴇйнᴏᴇ ɸᴏᴛᴏ🫶 нᴀᴋᴏннц ᴛᴏ ʍнᴇ ᴨᴩиᴇхᴀᴧ ϶ᴛᴏᴛ ɯиᴋᴀᴩный ᴨᴧюɯ ᴩᴇᴩиᴩᴀ💟 🍼 🤩🦌 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🍼🌙🌙🌙
custom 54044795317864759124🕊3custom 54113288836371323373custom 52692556389779122111
Sticker, posted without a caption
🎀 🌙🌙🌙 🤩_ #pic 🎀👾 ⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🌟 🦷🦷 🤍 🦷 🍀🎀 🤩🤩 🍀 🌻💭 Любᴏʙь быʙᴀᴇᴛ ᴄᴧᴇᴨᴀ, нᴏ ᴛᴀᴋ ᴄᴧᴀдᴋᴀ, чᴛᴏ нᴇʙᴏɜʍᴏжнᴏ ᴏᴛᴋᴀɜᴀᴛь ʙ ᴄᴛᴏᴧь ᴨᴩᴇᴋᴩᴀᴄнᴏʍ удᴏʙᴏᴧьᴄᴛʙии. 🤩🤩 🍼🍀🍀🍀🎀 𝘐𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦 yᴏur 𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮 🤩 . 🕊️ 💭 Bᴇᴀuᴛy ʙy @kotaorusu 🔔🎀
custom 54160084781393899675custom 54113288836371323374🕊3custom 52692556389779122111
🦷 🥀 🎀#hdk. 😻🎀 🩸🩸🩸 🎀 🍀🩸🍀🩸🍀🍀🎀 @🪶 🥩 _"🎁 AU: Rᴇrllis ᴀs Aid x Pᴇrsᴇᴩhᴏnᴇ🎀 Auᴛhᴏr: @Samanthas_Crypt ᴏn ᴛg🎀🕯️ Пᴩᴏдᴏᴧжᴇниᴇ хᴇдᴏʙ ᴨᴏ ϶ᴛᴏй жᴇ ᴀу .😌 🍀 🍼✝️ 🤩🎀🤩🤩 #🌙🌙🌙
custom 52692556389779122115custom 54160084781393899674custom 54113288836371323373🆒2custom 54044795317864759121
Sticker, posted without a caption
🦷 🥀 🎀#hdk. 😻🎀 🩸🩸🩸 🎀 🍀🩸🍀🩸🍀🍀🎀 @🪶 🥩 _"🎁 🔤ᴇᴩиᴩᴀ дᴏᴧᴦᴏᴇ ʙᴩᴇʍя ᴨᴏᴄᴧᴇ ʙᴏɜʙᴩᴀщᴇния ʙ Тᴇйʙᴀᴛ бᴩᴏᴄᴀᴧᴏ ʙ хᴏᴧᴏдный ᴨᴏᴛ и ᴨᴀниᴋу, ᴋᴏᴦдᴀ ᴏн нᴇ нᴀхᴏдиᴧ Нᴀ϶ᴧᴧиᴄу дᴏʍᴀ. Он бᴏяᴧᴄя, чᴛᴏ ᴄнᴏʙᴀ ʙᴄᴇ ᴨᴏᴛᴇᴩяᴧ. 🔤ᴩᴇɯниᴋ ᴨуᴧᴇй ʙыᴧᴇᴛᴀᴧ иɜ дᴏʍᴀ, ʙ ᴨᴀниᴋᴇ ʍᴇчᴀᴄь ᴨᴏ ᴏᴋᴩуᴦᴇ, ᴨуᴦᴀя жиʙнᴏᴄᴛь и ʍᴇᴄᴛных жиᴛᴇᴧᴇй, ᴨыᴛᴀяᴄь нᴀйᴛи ᴇё, ᴀ ᴋᴏᴦдᴀ ʙᴄᴇ ᴛᴀᴋи нᴀхᴏдиᴧ ʙ ᴋᴀᴋᴏʍ нибудь ʍᴇᴄᴛᴇ, чᴀщᴇ ʙᴄᴇᴦᴏ ɜᴀ ᴄᴏбиᴩᴀниᴇʍ ᴛᴩᴀʙ иᴧи нᴀ ᴩынᴋᴇ, ᴦдᴇ Нᴀ϶…
custom 54160084781393899675🕊4custom 54113288836371323373custom 54044795317864759122
Posted without readable text
🤩🤩 _🐈⬛ —.#rnd 🍼🍼₊⠀ ࣪🌙🌙🌙 ⭐️⭐️⭐️🌙 🎀. 🌟🕯️🕯️🕯️🕯️🗝 . 𐂯 🕯️🕯️ Пᴏᴄʍᴏᴛᴩиᴛᴇ нᴀ ϶ᴛу ᴨᴩᴇᴧᴇᴄᴛᴛ ᴋᴏᴛᴏᴩую ʍнᴇ нᴀ дᴩ ᴨᴏдᴀᴩиᴧи😭😭😭😭 Мᴏя Нᴀ϶ᴧᴧиᴄᴏчᴋᴀ🤲🤲💘 🍼 🤩🦌 ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🍼🌙🌙🌙
custom 54113288836371323375custom 54160084781393899672🕊1
🕯️ВЫ ПРЕДСТАЛВЯЕТЕ КАКОЙ ТО БРО ПО ЭТОМУ АРТУ УГАДАЛ ПОЛНОСТЬЮ ДИНАМИКУ ОТНОШЕНЙИ РЕРЛЛИС 😀Нᴀ ᴄᴛᴏᴧьᴋᴏ хᴏᴩᴏɯ быᴧ ᴩᴇɸ и иᴄᴨᴏᴧнᴇниᴇ чᴛᴏ ʙᴄᴇ чиᴛᴀᴇʍᴏ 😀 (🤩В ᴋᴏʍʍ ɜᴀᴋину ᴄᴀʍ ᴛᴇᴋᴄᴛ)
custom 54113288836371323374custom 54160084781393899672custom 54044795317864759121
🎀 🌙🌙🌙 🤩_ #pic 🎀👾 ⭐️⭐️⭐️ 🌟 🤩🤩 🤩 🤩 🍀🎀 🤩🤩 🍀 🌻💭 Фᴏᴛᴏᴦᴩᴀɸия ᴩᴇдᴋᴏ ʍᴏжᴇᴛ ᴨᴏᴋᴀɜᴀᴛь, чᴛᴏ ᴨᴩᴏиᴄхᴏдиᴛ нᴀ нᴇй ʙ ᴛᴏчных дᴇᴛᴀᴧях, ᴏднᴀᴋᴏ я ᴄчиᴛᴀю, чᴛᴏ ᴨᴏᴩᴏй дᴀжᴇ бᴇɜ ᴄᴧᴏʙ ʍᴏжнᴏ ᴨᴏняᴛь, ᴋᴀᴋ хᴏᴩᴏɯᴏ ᴧюдяʍ нᴀ нᴇй. 🍼🍀🍀🍀🎀 𝘐𝘮𝘢𝘨𝘪𝘯𝘦 yᴏur 𝘥𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘮 🤩 . 🕊️ 💭 Bᴇᴀuᴛy ʙy @Aggressiv_Dog 🔔🎀
🕊4custom 54044795317864759123custom 54113288836371323371
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rerirsfiancee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 962,921 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✧ 。Rᴇrllis ᴀrᴄhivᴇ ⁺⟢” (@rerirsfiancee), 39 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rerirsfiancee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.