5 measurements spanning 33 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63–70 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Sept 2026, 06:40
64
-2
23 Aug 2026, 10:24
66
-2
16 Aug 2026, 18:45
68
-1
10 Aug 2026, 00:16
69
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:45
69
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 46s
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1
50.0%
🔥
1
50.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2024 to 28 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚖️Самые рискованные инструменты продвижения на маркетплейсах - используйте их осторожно
🟢Подарок к товару
Риск в том, что часто подарки воруют, а покупателям они не достаются. Из-за этого появляются негативные отзывы и падает рейтинг карточки. Сделайте так, чтобы покупатели не воспринимали подарок как обязательную часть товара.
🟢Замена главного фото
В этом случае необходимо знать показатель CTR до и после замены. Е…
🔎Как наш клиент увеличил прибыль на +340.000 в месяц, проведя аналитику индекса локализации?
Проблема была в том, что товары нашего клиента находились только на складах в Москве и МО, а большая доля продаж приходилась на склад в Новосибирске. В такой ситуации индекс локализации товара нашего клиента был ниже, чем у конкурентов, которые отгружались и в Москву, и в Новосибирск. Это влияло и на сумму продаж, так как ра…
👌Подключение аналитики Reportium - это очень просто!
🕒Главное - это занимает до 5 минут!
Мы записали для вас пошаговое видео, как интегрировать Reportium к вашему магазину на Ozon или WB.
А также, как добавить вашу команду, чтобы любой сотрудник мог пользоваться функционалом нашего сервиса. И никаких дополнительных оплат!
🎁Заберите 2 недели доступа к сервису в подарок на нашем официальном сайте: https://vk.cc/cylTZ
🔴Ниши, с которых точно не стоит начинать, если вы новичок
👉🏻Одна из самых распространенных ошибок - это пытаться войти в заведомо невыгодную товарную нишу. Эту ошибку чаще всего совершают новички, но допустить ее могут даже опытные селлеры, так как рынок очень динамично меняется.
Давайте разберем эти рискованные ниши:
❌Cезонные товары (новогодние товары, наборы к первому сентября и т.д.)
Конкуренция в этой категори…
📊Каждый отчет в Reportium разделён на блоки с фильтрами, графиками и виджетами.
📌Их можно редактировать, добавлять или удалять для формирования персонализированных отчётов.
Посмотрите видео, и всего за 4 минуты вы сможете формировать отчеты, отвечающие вашим потребностям, чтобы принимать только эффективные управленческие решения!
✔️Попробуйте уже сейчас: переходите на наш сайт и активируйте 14 дней бесплатного дост…
❓Как управлять магазином эффективнее, а времени тратить меньше?
Посмотрите живой отзыв о том, как Reportium помог:
🟢Выявлять как самые прибыльные товары в ассортименте, так и нерентабельные;
🟢Забыть про рутину в Excel и получать нужные отчеты в 2 клика.
✔️Просто попробуйте REPORTIUM бесплатно на 2 недели, чтобы ощутить, как автоматизированные отчеты помогут вам сэкономить время!
Активируйте по ссылке: https://vk.cc…
Ответ: Бартер
Поделитесь своими ответами и узнайте, кто из ваших друзей также является экспертом в мире маркетплейсов!
Подпишись и будь в курсе всех тонкостей продвижения на маркетплейсах 💙
Переходите по ссылке для получения бесплатной консультации по ведению финансовой аналитики на маркетплейсах https://vk.cc/cxX3df
Какой алгоритм используется для рекомендации товаров на маркетплейсе?
Байесовский классификатор17%
Алгоритмы машинного обучения83%
Алгоритмы сортировки пузырьком0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed reporti_bot
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @reportium. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2024 to 28 July 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“REPORTIUM” (@reportium), 64 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reportium.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
