3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 233–235 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 18:17
235
+2
8 Aug 2026, 10:04
233
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:13
233
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
152.5%
avg views ÷ 235 subscribers
Avg views / post
358
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held
18 (26 July 2026 – 8 August 2026)
Views total
6,450
Reactions total
129
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
129 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
39
30.2%
🤡
18
14.0%
⚡
15
11.6%
😁
12
9.30%
🔥
11
8.53%
🥰
10
7.75%
👍
9
6.98%
👎
5
3.88%
💩
3
2.33%
😢
2
1.55%
🤔
2
1.55%
🤝
2
1.55%
💊
1
0.775%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Среди ув. участников этого канала есть желающие поучить кастильский, он же мексиканский, он же венесуэльский?
Рискну открыть пару слотов для нулевых и начинающих. Продвинутых мало чему обучу, но базу вкрутить, думаю, уже смогу.
Личка в описании канала.
There will come soft rains and the smell of the ground,
And swallows circling with their shimmering sound;
And frogs in the pools singing at night,
And wild plum trees in tremulous white;
Robins will wear their feathery fire,
Whistling their whims on a low fence-wire;
And not one will know of the war, not one
Will care at last when it is done.
Not one would mind, neither bird nor tree,
If mankind perished utterly;
An…
По итогам всех этих событий общая орфография современной английской группы языков находится в ужасающем состоянии. Реформировать её некому — нет единого контролирующего органа. Наполовину она также не английская вовсе.
Я вынужден из-за этого втыкать там и сям костыли.
Где-то в середине уровня B1 мои ученики обнаруживают, что мы сидим учим алфавит и правила чтения. Французского языка.
И треть английского резко начина…
Если вы когда-нибудь задавались в пустоту вопросом "да почему в английском такие нелогичные правила чтения и правописания? их что, совсем случайно выдумывали?!"
Сядьте и подумайте. Хорошо подумайте.
Затем вернитесь к этому посту.
Да, их случайно выдумывали, причём на коленке в четверном размере.
Жил да был среднеанглийский gost призрак. Жил, летал, всех пугал и в конце пятнадцатого века внезапно превратился в ghos…
Фух.
Пожалуй, самый трудоёмкий пост на канале. Чистых сочинений по литературе я не писал с 2023.
Если меня не порепостят во все массовые егэ-канальчики "Литература с Вовой Вистом | 9000-бальный Умскул", я на них обижусь.
Закидайте меня клоунами, напомните мне обо всём величии Чацкого.
Полковник Скалозуб! Прикажете принять?
О, воплощение лютующего царизма, глупый солдафон, мечтающий всех гнести фельдфебелем в Вольтеры. Ага. Ага. Я буду просто цитировать и пояснять его реплики, этого хватит.
Зачем же? Мне совестно, как честный офицер.
Типичный военный дуболом пришёл в гости. Обременять хозяина своей персоной стесняется настолько, что сам, всё сам. Насилу усадили.
— Кем вам доводится Настасья Нико…
Репетизм — это литературоведческий канал. Выдам-ка я основы по "Горю от ума", давно уже подкорку чешут.
Итак, что мы учат в школе? Есть, значит, такое фамусовское общество, которое подавило стремления молодого искреннего Чацкого к прогрессу, возглавляет общество Фамусов. Есть Скалозуб, тупой вояка, одна извилина и та от фуражки. Есть Молчалин, со всеми соглашается и подо всех ложится. Есть ветреная глупышка Софья.
К…
#в_соседнем_чате начали рассказывать вашему покорному за критический мышлений и о том, что ваш покорный есть промытая жертва злокозненной ватной пропаганды.
с радостью принимаю титул, а также превращаю этот канал в цырк самолюбования, выкладывая свой ответ. он мне очень понравился просто.
как известно, есть пять степеней интеллектуальной свободы, от низшей к высшей.
1) считает, что не является жертвой пропаганды. …
#репетизм_многоязычный
Испанский флаг отклеился даже от пола, на который упал.
Через полгодика я буду учить тут каталанскому.
Visca Catalunya lliure!
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @repetizm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 972,379 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“репетиzм” (@repetizm), 235 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/repetizm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.