Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

блог сумикочан

@rensumiko

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

32subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003779495935
TypeChannel
Username@rensumiko
DescriptionЛс: @rensumiko Анон: https://t.me/anonaskbot?start=user_iohwlwhdzc Присутствует контент 16+ и 18+
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/rensumiko

Growth

313231.57 August 2026 — 31 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31–32 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 02:0132no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:0232+1
7 Aug 2026, 03:1731first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
123.9%
avg views ÷ 32 subscribers
Avg views / post
39.6
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held18 (24 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total674
Reactions total132
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
48
Videos
29
Links
27

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 39s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

132 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52380806016800139142922.0%
custom 54564336724020144692518.9%
custom 51952692653216649932317.4%
custom 52336400693524005571914.4%
custom 54563689257700301461612.1%
custom 519292612443849681843.03%
custom 532600019713683722043.03%
custom 546300877770591048843.03%
custom 534848467305393457021.52%
🍓21.52%
custom 541114930675950719610.758%
custom 545647217678381411510.758%
10.758%
💘10.758%

Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC10 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

67 Спасибо вам за бешенную статистику🤩 (аккаунту в пинтересте сегодня месяц исполнится )

custom 54563689257700301463

10 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC17 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Как от городского мальчика, так сильно пахнет морем ?⋆⭒˚.⋆🫧 Файл в комментариях! ⊹ ࣪ ﹏𓊝﹏𓂁﹏⊹ ࣪ ˖ #art #minecraft #бергфд

custom 52380806016800139147custom 54563689257700301462custom 52336400693524005571custom 53484846730539345701

9 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC21 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩₍^. .^₎Ⳋ #minecraft #art #бергфд

custom 52380806016800139146custom 53260001971368372202custom 54563689257700301462

9 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC23 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Poll

По каким фд вы бы хотели чаще видеть арты? (Для меня это важно🤍)

  1. бергфд85%
  2. ос и твои персонажи!15%
  3. игры, новеллы0%
  4. свой вариант(напишите в комментариях!)0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 53260001971368372202

7 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC35 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Пару скетчей с Ромбергами/Бергромами, которые я не доделала🤗 #sketch #minecraft

custom 52380806016800139144custom 545636892577003014631custom 52336400693524005571

6 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC39 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩Что лечишь я не знал, но теперь и мне всё понятно🤗🎀 #minecraft #art

custom 52380806016800139148custom 52336400693524005575

6 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC41 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤍🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🤍

custom 52380806016800139144custom 53484846730539345701custom 54563689257700301461custom 54564721767838141151

5 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC37 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

🌟🤩🎀ew face!🤍🤍🤩 🤩tt:rensumiko🤩 🪄🪄🪄🪄 Пусть только попробует не залететь, я несколько дней делала, надеюсь Никита увидит и заценит🤩 #minecraft #video

custom 52336400693524005578🍓2custom 54563689257700301462

3 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC44 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

🤩🤩🎀it me baby! 🤍⋆˙⟡ 🤩tt:rensumiko🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩 На 3 августа грех не выложить видео Незнаю че постить вам🤔 можете накидать идей для анимки или еще подобное, буду все по очереди реализовывать ◝ ⩊ ◜.ᐟ #minecraft #video

custom 52336400693524005574custom 54563689257700301463

29 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC54 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

🤍🎀umb,numb .ᐟ.ᐟ🤩 🤩tt:rensumiko🤩 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Насколько люблю ромимиков? Очень #minecraft ,#video

custom 54564336724020144695custom 54630087777059104883

29 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC51 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩🌟🌟🤍 🤩🤩 Файлом в комментариях! #minecraft ,#art

custom 54564336724020144696💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @rensumiko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

9 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTCAnonymous Poll13 voters

По каким фд вы бы хотели чаще видеть арты? (Для меня это важно🤍)

  1. бергфд85%
  2. ос и твои персонажи!15%
  3. игры, новеллы0%
  4. свой вариант(напишите в комментариях!)0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 276,609 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“блог сумикочан” (@rensumiko), 32 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rensumiko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.