Channel
@renschambers
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
37subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004294070282 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @renschambers |
| Description | Косплеер Пьеро из Петропавловска 🇰🇿 Любишь цирк уродцев? Оставайся здесь, моя леди ТТ:@imvayannn |
| Created | Between 1 May 2026 and 21 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/renschambers |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 37 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 37 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 21 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (21 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 409 |
| Reactions total | 29 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
53 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 39.6% | |
| 💘 | 19 | 35.8% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 7.55% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 5.66% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 3.77% | |
| 🤗 | 2 | 3.77% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.89% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.89% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Какой из моих косплеев вам больше всего нравится?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Сегодня гуляли с косбэндом и поснимали видосы. Как только мне скинут все я вам покажу.
🔥3
🃏[She/her] 🍰[27.04] Приветик, меня зовут Рен! Я начинающий косплеер в городе Петропавловск 🇰🇿. Мои работы показаны сверху. Мои основные фандомы: Яндере новеллы как the Freaky circus, the kid at the back, 14 day's with you, you make this house a home и так далее (их очень много), музыкальные игры как секай, Friday Night Funkin, ещё начала играть в Ensemble Stars, аниме: Jujutsu Kaisen (магическая битва), Клинок рас…
❤1💘1
❌ 🎀✨✨✨✨✨✨✨🎀 Ждиᴛᴇ нᴀᴄ нᴀ Кʙᴀ-Кʙᴀ ʍᴀᴩᴋᴇᴛᴇ 31 ᴏᴋᴛябᴩя ʙ Nightcord at 25:00 ʙ ᴋᴏᴄᴛюʍᴀх ᴄ God-ish ʙʍᴇᴄᴛᴇ ᴄ Кᴀйᴛᴏ!! Будᴇʍ ᴩᴀды ᴨᴏɸᴏᴛᴋᴀᴛьᴄя и ᴨᴏᴏбщᴀᴛьᴄя ᴄ ʙᴀʍи🎀
❤2💘1
маленький и актуальный интерактив для косплеера и его аудитории: 💙 какого персонажа от автора канала вы большего всего ожидаете или стесняетесь предложить, но чертовски хотели бы увидеть? ☁️отправляйте в комментарии или пишите в анонимку (ссылка в коммах) 🐰
❤3🍓1
𝒟𝒪𝒰ℳ𝒜 Я хочу сделать этих людей счастливыми, хочу помочь им. Ради этого я был рождён #Douma #cosplay #demonslayer
❤4
АНОНС!! Ждᥙᴛᥱ ʍᥱня 25.07 нᥲ κ᧐ᥴᥰ᧐-᧐δʍᥱнᥱ ʙ κ᧐ᥴᥰ᧘ᥱᥱ нᥲɯᥱᴦ᧐ ᧘юδᥙʍ᧐ᴦ᧐ ɯуᴛᥲ 𐌿ьᥱρ᧐! 𐌺ᥴᴛᥲᴛᥙ ᴛᥱʍ κᴛ᧐ δудᥱᴛ ᥰ᧐дх᧐дᥙᴛь ɸ᧐ᴛκᥲᴛьᥴя δуду κ᧐ᥱ чᴛ᧐ ρᥲɜдᥲʙᥲᴛь. 🃏 Также я кое-что для вас подготовила, дамы и господа.) Следите за моими соц сетями такими как тик ток, тгк и инстаграмм. 𝑬𝒏𝒋𝒐𝒚 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒑𝒆𝒓𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆, 𝒎𝒚 𝒍𝒂𝒅𝒚.~
❤5🤗2💘1
🤍🤍𝙸𝚗𝚏𝚘 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝🤍🤍 Вᴄᴇʍ ᴨᴩиʙᴇᴛ!! Мы нᴏʙый ᴋᴏᴄбᴇнд 𝘿𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙢 𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙫𝙚𝙮 𝙩𝙚𝙖𝙢 ⭐ Пᴏяʙиᴧиᴄь ʍы ᴄᴏʙᴄᴇʍ нᴇдᴀʙнᴏ, ᴏднᴀᴋᴏ ʙᴨᴇᴩᴇди иʍᴇᴇʍ ʍнᴏжᴇᴄᴛʙᴏ ᴨᴧᴀнᴏʙ 🤩[Сᴏᴄᴛᴀʙ ᴋᴏʍᴀнды]✩➳ 🌟𝘈𝘓𝘪𝘬𝘢𝘳 🌟𝘔𝘪𝘯𝘵 𝘭𝘢𝘬𝘦 🌟Митчи 🌟Хикару 🌟𝘠𝘶𝘬𝘪 🌟𝘙𝘦𝘯 Будᴇʍ иᴄᴋᴩᴇннᴇ бᴧᴀᴦᴏдᴀᴩны ɜᴀ ᴨᴏᴄᴇщᴇниᴇ ᴛᴇᴧᴇᴦᴩᴀʍ ᴋᴀнᴀᴧᴀ и ᴨᴩᴏяʙᴧᴇниᴇ инᴛᴇᴩᴇᴄᴀ ᴋ нᴀɯᴇʍу ᴛʙᴏᴩчᴇᴄᴛʙу. Вᴀɯи ᴩᴇᴀᴋции и ᴋᴏʍʍᴇнᴛᴀᴩии ᴄиᴧьнᴏ ʍᴏᴛиʙиᴩуюᴛ ᴨᴩᴏдᴏᴧжᴀᴛь ᴩᴀбᴏᴛу нᴀд ᴨᴩᴏᴇᴋᴛᴏʍ и ᴄᴏɜдᴀʙᴀᴛь нᴏʙыᴇ ᴏбᴩᴀɜы⭐ 🤩[Х϶ɯᴛᴇᴦи, иᴄᴨᴏᴧьɜу…
💘5
#пиар@renschambers
➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 💦💦 💦💦💦💦💦💦 ➖ривет!! я кефир (начинающий косплеер из петропавловска) ,начала заниматься косплеем совсем недавно !! хочу себе большую аудиторию а так же одеваюсь в тенши кавай!!🤩🤩 🤩🤩 🤩🤩 ➖➖➖➖➖➖ my shield post : 🖥 my tik tok : 🖥 my boost : 🖥 my anon: 🖥🤍🤍 а так же я делаю арты на заказ вп держу - максимум 3 дня 🌟🌟🌟
Сегодня ближе к 15:?? вы скорее всего сможете встретить меня на Ленино в косплее Пьеро. Ищите, Миледи. 🍧
💘8
Кстати ребят хочу напомнить (а некоторым рассказать). Я делаю сигны в косплее. Прайс вот такой: 1 фото без шапки - 1400 тг 1 фото без шапки - 1600 тг Комбо(2 с шапкой, 2 без) - 3200 тг. ‼️ОПЛАТА СТРОГО ПО КАСПИ‼️ Для связи пишите в комментарии, в лс я уже вам напишу.
🤔3💘2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @renschambers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какой из моих косплеев вам больше всего нравится?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 839,010 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@renschambers named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝓡𝓮𝓷'𝓼 𝓬𝓱𝓪𝓶𝓫𝓮𝓻𝓼 🃏” (@renschambers), 37 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/renschambers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.