Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 24.5%
- avg views ÷ 269 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 66.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- 10.6%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,190
- Videos
- ≈139
- Links
- ≈77
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 11s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
175 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
14 Sept 2026, 20:40 UTC66 views7 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Photo
Благодаря работе и творческой среде я всё чаще возвращаюсь к себе — к той части себя , которая когда-то естественно существовала в искусстве .
В школе и на первых курсах университета я много рисовала. Сегодня воспринимаю это не как эпизод прошлого, а как важный способ мышления, который со временем оказался вытеснен рациональностью повседневной жизни.
Рисунок — это не фиксация увиденного. Это акт познания. В нём мыс…
custom 54316410595851792104❤3
23 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC205 views14 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Video message
Video message, posted without a caption
❤14
11 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC315 views15 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Сейчас там … где спокойно
Намерение … всё отпустить, начать дышать полной грустью , больше наблюдать и никуда не торопиться
❤🔥9❤6
11 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC309 views14 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Video message
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 584369149458986208311custom 53234703153705852852💋1
2 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC355 views10 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Forwarded from @evodays
В эру красивой картинки в социальных сетях не стоит забывать, что мы видим лишь то, что хотят показывать люди.
Не сравнивайте, не анализируйте.
Расслабьтесь, начните видеть хорошее рядом - только так можно быть счастливым человеком.
❤🔥10
11 Jun 2026, 17:54 UTC670 views17 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Photo
❤️ наконец-то ушли отёки
Как ?)
Просто высыпаться и не нервничать) 2 недели отпуска пошли на пользу)
custom 53234703153705852859❤8
10 Jun 2026, 17:54 UTC599 views7 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Video message
Video message, posted without a caption
❤7
10 Jun 2026, 16:31 UTC486 views5 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Video message
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53234703153705852853❤2
10 Jun 2026, 16:31 UTC469 views5 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Video message
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53234703153705852855
4 Jun 2026, 06:02 UTC498 views7 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Video message
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53642014358587448697
4 Jun 2026, 06:00 UTC461 views7 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Video message
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 58436914945898620837
3 Jun 2026, 04:42 UTC444 views11 reactionsread 18 September 2026 Video
Самая вкусная матча в Шанхае 😍
custom 584369149458986208311
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @renee_yoga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Бизнес Личность
@Business_lichnost · 24,784
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 September 2026 This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Prana ✨” (@renee_yoga), 269 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/renee_yoga.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.