Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

КАМБЭК | RENAISSANCE

@renaissanceoi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

685subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001822415993
TypeChannel
Username@renaissanceoi
Created22 June 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/renaissanceoi

Growth

6857 Aug 2026, 10:17 — 685 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 19:12 — 685 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 10:177 Aug 2026, 19:12
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 684–686 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 19:12685no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:17685first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.6%
avg views ÷ 685 subscribers
Avg views / post
278
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held17 (15 July 20262 August 2026)
Views total4,726
Reactions total286
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

286 reactions across 8 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53482133900346138543512.2%
custom 53480418447458443693311.5%
custom 53777055474767774263211.2%
custom 53482183764916450943010.5%
custom 53799139036962619792910.1%
custom 5348522829543385955258.74%
custom 5380095546453144316248.39%
custom 5413541431744690626248.39%
custom 5348553753307917065196.64%
custom 5377749807114762519155.24%
custom 5348512817974619607103.50%
custom 5417840792792232820103.50%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 286reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @renaissanceoi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC159 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Итоги канала RENAISSANCE за июль! 💜 Мона, мы с вами добились достаточно больших результатов! Мы стараемся приносить вам больше своей деятельности и креатива! Пожалуйста подскажите, каких постов помимо каверов вы хотели бы видеть на канале? Мы учтем ваши идеи и пожелания, чтобы канал ренессанс стал ещё интереснее 💜

2 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC147 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

🧪🎀𝐍ew 𝐂ovᧉr (audio) . ❤️#.ot7🎀 🤩🤍 ·➿ —· ➿ ·— ➿· 🤍 🤩. 𝐎MG 🧪 ℜᧉn𐐼ִiss𐐼ִncᧉ 🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤍 ·➿ —· ➿ ·— ➿· 🤍. ▫️ . 𝔊. ❤️ @renaissanceoi

custom 53485128179746196075custom 53480418447458443692custom 53482133900346138542

25 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC336 viewsread 7 August 2026

Открыта реклама на август кстати ☝🏻 Писать @dikki_d

24 Jul 2026, 13:35 UTC361 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пришло время попрощаться с нашей временной участницей — Майн🤍 На самом деле деятельность RENAISSANCE в составе от7 затянулась намного дольше, чем мы изначально планировали. Мы собирались выпустить всего два кавера, но за это время Майн стала важной частью нашей команды. Мы хотим искренне поблагодарить Майн за всю работу, которую она проделала вместе с нами. Спасибо за твой труд, поддержку и вклад в нашу команду. Ты

custom 534852282954338595523custom 534855375330791706510custom 53482133900346138548custom 53480418447458443697

24 Jul 2026, 13:33 UTC220 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @JumpTteamPhoto

ㅤOfficial〈 JumpTeam 〉🤩 Audition Producers Team. All rights reserved Наши обязанности ; Что вы получите будучи нашим артистом? ; Работы JumpTeam ; О нас 🤩info in comments. TokyoGirls 24.07 Audition Open🤩 @JumpTTeamBot

custom 53485537533079170652

24 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC554 views93 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🧪🎀𝐍ew 𝐂ovᧉr . ❤️ #.ot7🎀 🤩🤍 ·➿ —· ➿ ·— ➿· 🤍 🤩. 𝐎MG 🧪 ℜᧉn𐐼ִiss𐐼ִncᧉ 🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🤩🤍 ·➿ —· ➿ ·— ➿· 🤍. ▫️ . 𝔊. ❤️ @renaissanceoi

custom 534821837649164509430custom 534821339003461385425custom 534804184474584436924custom 53485537533079170657custom 53485128179746196075custom 53485228295433859552

23 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC307 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🧪🎀𝐍ew 𝐂ovᧉr . ❤️#.ot7🎀 🤩🤩🤍 ·➿ —· ➿ ·— ➿· 🤍 🤩🤩. 🧪 ℜᧉn𐐼ִiss𐐼ִncᧉ 🤩🤩🤍 ·➿ —· ➿ ·— ➿· 🤍 🤩🤩▫️𝔊. TOMORROW . ❤️

custom 541354143174469062621custom 537770554747677742615custom 537991390369626197913custom 53800955464531443165

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @renaissanceoi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 363,126 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КАМБЭК | RENAISSANCE” (@renaissanceoi), 685 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/renaissanceoi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.