Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

RENAISSANCE — 01.05..

@renaissancefm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

560subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001725208084
TypeChannel
Username@renaissancefm
DescriptionPower fears silence more than resistance — it knows silence is already inside. RP: 10:00 — 20:00.
Created24 September 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/renaissancefm

Growth

5607 Aug 2026, 15:57 — 560 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:34 — 560 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:578 Aug 2026, 03:34
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 559–561 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 03:34560no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:57560first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.2%
avg views ÷ 560 subscribers
Avg views / post
74.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held19 (13 March 202619 July 2026)
Views total74
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,640
Videos
1,000
Links
681

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @renaissancefm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 March 2026 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 20:09 UTC74 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @SATURICPhoto

✉️✉️🎀 ☺️овый 🗡🗡🗡🗡 ☺️ромптик 🎀 Новый промпт уже здесь. А вместе с ним пачка красивых кадров с Кирой. Ну и, конечно же, моя любимая герлфренд тоже решила влезть в генерацию, вместе со своим мафиябоссом. И наша с ней совместная фоточка тоже затесалась, как небольшой пример того, что этот промпт вообще сделает. 🌧️🌧️🦋🦋🦋🦋🌧️🌧️ 🌟Generate an image using the two attached photos. Do not alter facial features. Figure

Signed Saturism

10 Jul 2026, 05:58 UTC138 viewsread 8 August 2026

☺️👍☺️ 😊 👍👍👍😍☺️👍👍👍☺️ Устал собирать всё по кусочкам? До сих пор сидишь в Character.AI, терпишь цензуру и молишься, чтобы персонаж не забыл, кто он, спустя три сообщения? Или, может, уже словил флешбеки от «в воздухе пахло озоном», «он зарычал», «он прижал тебя к стене», а DeepSeek настолько добрый, что злится вообще на всех... кроме тебя? 💐 Тогда залетай ➡️ здесь ты найдешь не просто подборку файлов, а вещи, которым

Signed Saturism

14 Apr 2026, 07:49 UTC422 viewsread 8 August 2026

я человек непостоянный, захочу и уже через пять минут ренессанс будет вновь открыт

Signed Saturism

14 Apr 2026, 07:49 UTC396 viewsread 8 August 2026

кстати если ренессанс закрыт, то это не означает, что у вас появилось добро на то, чтобы пиздить наши идеи и реализацию. все, что делал ренессанс является моей индивидуальной собственностью и просто перекачивало в аксис ✋😆 еще смешнее видеть подобное от тех, кто хуесосит меня и ренессанс, а потом слизывает нашу концепцию и реализацию стилистики в оформлениях/проектах/творческих работах 😉

Signed Saturism

23 Mar 2026, 11:14 UTC469 viewsread 8 August 2026

я люблю оформщиков, с которыми ты с первых сообщений ловишь коннект и они понимают твои запросы с полу-мата

Signed Saturism

21 Mar 2026, 09:00 UTC459 viewsread 8 August 2026

мне нужно хотя бы пять человек, которые располагают свободным временем и хотят намутить интересного

Signed Saturism

20 Mar 2026, 08:52 UTC478 viewsread 8 August 2026

я ниче не обещаю, просто хочу посмотреть, мб действительно наберется полноценная команда

Signed Saturism

20 Mar 2026, 08:51 UTC484 viewsread 8 August 2026

ну давайте чисто глянем. кто вообще хочет и располагает свободным временем чтобы собирать информацию о конфликтах? пересылать посты и скриншотить в бот юзер свой @sat1anon_bot

Signed Saturism

20 Mar 2026, 08:44 UTC418 views0 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

один лайк и я делаю здесь вирт новостник

Signed Saturism

17 Mar 2026, 16:44 UTC407 viewsread 8 August 2026

ребят я отравилась и меня жестко тошнит уже сутки, а утром мне на работу, а вы тут со своими виртами

Signed Saturism

17 Mar 2026, 16:35 UTC387 viewsread 8 August 2026

вы говорите индивидуальности не существует, а я говорю открыть канал страйф и санктум, которые начали вести семью недавно и у них каждая рубрика уникальна и в стилистике их семей. говорю открыть канал кисас, которые выделяются своей тематикой и оформлением. и у меня дохулион таких примеров к семьям, с которыми ренессанс был в сотрудничестве: у каждого была своя, индивидуальная черта. так индивидуальности не существуе

Signed Saturism

17 Mar 2026, 16:23 UTC369 viewsread 8 August 2026

все такие дохуя умные-разумные, вы если пришли в уже устоявшееся комьюнити со своей накрученной лотереями аудиторией, то ведите себя хотя бы не по свински. не затирайте людям, которые въебывают на свою семью и аудиторию, что индивидуальности не существует и поэтому вам все можно. индивидуальности нет у штампованных, одинаковых во всем виртбтсшных семей, где дай бог отличается только администрация. и если вы собираете

Signed Saturism

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @renaissancefm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 168,803 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RENAISSANCE — 01.05..” (@renaissancefm), 560 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/renaissancefm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.