Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

эмпатический контакт

@ren_psy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

379subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002062233580
TypeChannel
Username@ren_psy
DescriptionТелеграм канал практикующего женского психолога о том, как мыслить яснее, чувствовать легче и действовать осознаннее ❤️‍🩹 Вопросы/запись @anastasiiarpsy http://cbtpsychologist.ru https://vk.com/renpsy
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ren_psy

Growth

3797 Aug 2026, 12:52 — 379 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:16 — 379 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 12:528 Aug 2026, 06:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 378–380 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:16379no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:52379first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 15 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.4%
avg views ÷ 379 subscribers
Avg views / post
81.0
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held17 (15 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total648
Reactions total121
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
361
Videos
2
Links
30

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

245 reactions across 17 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7932.2%
🔥4418.0%
👍4217.1%
❤‍🔥187.35%
🎉156.12%
💯124.90%
😁124.90%
👻62.45%
👏31.22%
🤝31.22%
💘20.816%
🙈20.816%
10.408%
10.408%
🕊10.408%
😍10.408%
😭10.408%
🤣10.408%
🥰10.408%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 245reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 17 we hold a reading for · 35%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ren_psy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC17 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В тему прошлого поста ⬆️

3👍2💯1

6 Aug 2026, 09:07 UTC23 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#чтонового в психологии Перфекционизм теперь проблема не высоких стандартов? Учёные проанализировали 83 исследования с участием более 32 тысяч человек и пришли к выводу, который, как мне кажется, важно услышать каждому человеку, склонному к перфекционизму. Оказывается, проблема заключается не в высоких стандартах сами по себе. Если человеку просто нравится делать свою работу качественно, развиваться и стремиться к

6👍3🔥3❤‍🔥1🎉1

29 Jul 2026, 19:01 UTC46 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А устойчивость = гибкость и адаптивность в мышлении и поведении 🔗👌

7👍4❤‍🔥1🎉1💯1

27 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC57 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему два человека могут (и чаще всего) совершенно по-разному реагируют на одну и ту же ситуацию? Представьте самую типичную ситуацию: начальник просит двух сотрудников выйти на работу в выходной. Первый, подумав, спокойно отвечает: «К сожалению, я не смогу». Второй испытывает сильную тревогу, чувство вины, соглашается, хотя очень не хочет, а потом ещё несколько дней злится на себя. Почему так? Ситуация же абсол

4🤝3🔥2❤‍🔥1👍1

23 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC65 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Иногда, чтобы почувствовать себя лучше, нужно не идти к психологу, а просто уехать в лес, чтобы слушать шум листвы на ветру😂

5🔥5💯3🎉2❤‍🔥1🕊1

20 Jul 2026, 14:06 UTC73 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня снова о навыках осознанности (Mindfulness)💭 Для небольшой практики отработки навыка быть «здесь и сейчас», я предлагаю вам попробовать несколько простых упражнений: 1. Упражнение «Я заметила…» Попробуйте продолжить 10 предложений: Я заметила, что сейчас мне хочется… Я заметила, что сейчас мне страшно… Я заметила, что сейчас моё тело… Я заметила, что сейчас мне трудно… Я заметила, что прямо сейчас мне прия

👍8🔥42🎉21

17 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC69 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня я открываю рубрику #чтонового в психологии🔱 Пока я много и упорно копаюсь в современных научных исследованиях, пытаясь определиться с темой своей будущей научной работы, я поймала себя на мысли, что мне очень хочется делиться с вами тем, что сейчас происходит в мире психологии. Раз в неделю я буду рассказывать вам о современных исследованиях простым и понятным языком. Не только о том, что уже давно известно

👍5🔥54🎉3❤‍🔥1

14 Jul 2026, 17:25 UTC298 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дорогие подписчики и клиенты! Профессиональное развитие для любого специалиста помогающей профессии, а особенно для психолога, является неотъемлемой частью работы. Именно оно позволяет оставаться компетентным, эффективным и предлагать своим клиентам качественную и современную помощь. Поэтому хочу поделиться с вами двумя очень важными профессиональными событиями, которые происходят в моей жизни сейчас. Во-первых я

🔥107👍3🎉2👏2

9 Jul 2026, 18:49 UTC292 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

как говорится «мем смешной, ситуация страшная» кому знакомо?😅

5😁5👍3🎉2🔥1🤣1🙈1

8 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC529 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему так сложно понять, что именно вы чувствуете? Потому что в большинстве случаев мы испытываем не одну эмоцию, а сразу несколько. Именно это и делает эмоциональные переживания такими запутанными🤔 Например, после конфликта с близким человеком можно одновременно испытывать злость из-за несправедливости, страх потерять отношения, печаль из-за эмоциональной дистанции и стыд за сказанные слова. Всё это ощущается как

5❤‍🔥3🎉2🔥2👍1💯1

29 Jun 2026, 11:27 UTC509 views9 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

А ведь и правда 😂😂😂

😁32💯2🥰1😭1

28 Jun 2026, 08:58 UTC507 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«У меня ПТСР?» Что происходит с психикой после травмы Когда люди слышат словосочетание «посттравматическое стрессовое расстройство», они чаще всего представляют военные действия, катастрофы или другие экстремальные события. Однако в своей практике я регулярно сталкиваюсь с тем, что многие люди не узнают травму в собственном опыте. 😡 Иногда травматичным становится не только событие, связанное с угрозой жизни. Это мо

3❤‍🔥2🔥2💘1💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ren_psy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“эмпатический контакт” (@ren_psy), 379 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ren_psy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.