Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Александр Быданцев (Трикстер)

Channel

Александр Быданцев (Трикстер)

@religiontrickster

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,756subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001305871787
TypeChannel
Username@religiontrickster
Created18 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/religiontrickster

Growth

3,7553,7583,756.57 August 2026 — 3,758 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,757 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,755 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,756 subscribers3,7567 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,755–3,758 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:043,756+1
10 Aug 2026, 16:533,755-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:143,757-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:153,758first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 20s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

954 reactions across 18 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬18119.0%
👍17318.1%
😭12913.5%
12513.1%
😢10110.6%
🔥444.61%
😨424.40%
😁353.67%
🤔272.83%
🤯222.31%
👏111.15%
👎80.839%
🤮80.839%
😱70.734%
❤‍🔥60.629%
40.419%
💔30.314%
😐30.314%
🙈30.314%
🤝30.314%
11 further kinds191.99%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 954reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @religiontrickster. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 May 2026 to 16 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 04:11 UTC≈1,390 views152 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Уважаемые друзья! Я уже неделю думаю, как бы мне написать этот пост так, чтобы объяснить свое решение. Буду краток. В связи с множеством факторов, происходящих как в моей жизни, так и в стране, я удаляю чат. Что будет с блогом - пока думаю.

😭100😨17😢11🔥6❤‍🔥4💔3🤝3🤯3

20 Jun 2026, 06:14 UTC≈2,210 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @cognitivniynadzor

Поехали! Максимальный репост 💪😁 https://youtube.com/live/I237T2n2MhE

🔥15👍5

19 Jun 2026, 19:07 UTC≈2,140 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Послэмился. Гилиад красавцы

😁23👍74🥰3🥴3

18 Jun 2026, 05:27 UTC≈2,050 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Лекция Александра Бутягина про археологию потенциальных мест захоронения апостолов Петра и Павла. Бутягин в последнее время стал известен из-за дикой выходки польских властей, которые задержали Александра, когда тот планировал выступить с лекцией в Варшаве. Есть недоумки, которые посмеиваются над Бутягиным из-за этого, мол, будет знать, что нельзя оставаться нейтралом, когда проводишь раскопки в Крыму, что отлично ил

👍24👻1

15 Jun 2026, 16:03 UTC≈1,680 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @nikitaobraztsov

Сходил на очень крутой подкаст "Спич" от Литреса! Получилось полтора часа крайне плотного разговора о религии и ее изучении. Уделили время разным квазирелигиям, обсудили даже трансгуманизм и биохакинг. Ну и куда без обсуждения магии, колдунов-волшебников и иных агентов современной духовности 👀 Очень классные вопросы от Дарьи, была видна ее подготовка и вовлеченность. Так что, приходите смотреть и слушать, это интер

👍1412🔥5

9 Jun 2026, 09:43 UTC≈1,880 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В конце обсуждения аргумента Глеб дал пару забавных примеров. Он сказал, что философы, богословы и верующие не используют термин "душа" в научном смысле (про душу он стал говорить в контексте вопросов об этике, сознании, свободе воли). Но это вздор, так как церковные авторитеты, называемые святыми отцами, признавали, что душа - это не просто разговоры о свободе, этике и отличии человека от животных, но душа телесна и

19👍9👏4🤔3👎1😐1

9 Jun 2026, 09:41 UTC≈1,550 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Только наука нормально объясняет мир? Посмотрел критику Панчина на канале "Пробел". Общее ощущение - манипуляция с интересными экскурсами в историю философии науки. Уже с первого блока критики Панчина я был в недоумении о того, что критик (его зовут Глеб) решил свести всю позицию Панчина о боге в радикальный эмпиризм лишь на основании некоторых аргументов из дебатов Панчина со священником и с иудеем. Панчин в этих д

15👍7👏4👎2🤔2😐1

6 Jun 2026, 14:53 UTC≈1,630 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Пробел критикует Панчина, хотя не без пробелов, но интересно и поучительно: https://youtu.be/Nd-RZs3GQbk?si=FoYvDMU2bhTgQ3d6

7🔥5👍3🤮3

4 Jun 2026, 11:56 UTC≈1,680 views60 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ostorozhno_novostiPhoto

Татуировщицу из Екатеринбурга арестовали за «пропаганду сатанизма» за фото своих работ в тг-канале. Как узнали «Осторожно, новости», 26 мая сотрудники полиции задержали 23-летнюю татуировщицу Полину С. Силовики обнаружили в канале, в котором она размещала примеры своих работ, фото «женщины с татуировкой летучей мыши и нижнем белье с изображением Бафомета» и девушки с чокером с пятиконечной «сатанинской» звездой. Фо

🤬39🤯14😱4👏3

3 Jun 2026, 04:43 UTC≈1,880 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сегодня состоятся дебаты между мракобесом Кириченко и Соколовым на Когнитивном надзоре. Правка: оказывается, это не дебаты, а заочная дискуссия. Короче, хз че там Савицкий придумал. https://www.youtube.com/live/p7LoVEG0l_o?si=BSp-FvSgMt9krApF

👍17🔥42💩1

2 Jun 2026, 11:52 UTC≈1,770 views72 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ostorozhno_novostiVideo

— «Меня ударили ножом». — «Не думаю, что это так, приятель». Британские полицейские задержали умирающего от ножевого ранения парня — преступник соврал им, что стал жертвой нападения на «расовой почве». Силовики поверили убийце, жертва умерла, умоляя их о помощи. Конфликт между 18-летним Генри Новаком и 23-летним Викрумом Дигвой произошёл 3 декабря прошлого года в Саутгемптоне. По данным следствия, Новак возвращалс

😢42🤬23🙈3❤‍🔥21🤮1

1 Jun 2026, 18:31 UTC≈1,300 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ostorozhno_novostiPhoto

Зампреда Духовного управления мусульман РФ оштрафовали на 150 тысяч рублей из-за картины битвы на Калке в его кабинете. Решение вынес мировой суд в Тушино. Мухетдинова признали виновным в осквернении предметов религиозного почитания (ст. 5.26 КоАП) из-за картины в кабинете муфтия. На ней изображён исторический сюжет — битва на Калке между Золотой Ордой и русским войском. Из-за неё на Мухетдинова ещё в феврале 2025 г

🤔17👍142😁2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @religiontrickster. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,462,088 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Александр Быданцев (Трикстер)” (@religiontrickster), 3,756 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/religiontrickster.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.