Channel
@rektor_flow
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
60subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003551750102 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rektor_flow |
| Description | Весь контент, представленный на данном канале, является вымышленным, отражает исключительно авторское видение и не является рекомендацией к формированию каких-либо выводов, действий или мыслей. По всем вопросам - @rektor_routes |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 2 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rektor_flow |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 60 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 60 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
239 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5219872564569972166 | 79 | 33.1% | |
| custom 5274195706066781810 | 54 | 22.6% | |
| custom 5323470315370585285 | 37 | 15.5% | |
| custom 5379656338802482888 | 31 | 13.0% | |
| custom 5368475679937534380 | 17 | 7.11% | |
| custom 5208460673255743317 | 15 | 6.28% | |
| custom 5386587088873331829 | 6 | 2.51% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 239reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2026 to 19 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rektor_flow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 February 2026 to 19 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Завтра закину промежуточные результаты по рубрике «Будние КА» 😊 Все также можете предлагать свои банки под тест, протестируем их за вас и покажем результат здесь 👍 P.S. Сбер умер, отп продолжает ехать и чувствует себя все также прекрасно Для друзей
custom 53234703153705852855custom 52198725645699721662custom 53684756799375343802
Теперь понятно, из-за чего идут массовые блокировки, но думаю многие и так догадывались где, что и как https://www.interfax.ru/business/1073581 Для друзей
custom 52084606732557433174custom 52198725645699721662custom 53796563388024828882
Где то видел, что озон сливает своих клиентов, у которых заметили подозрительную активность, тогда не предал значения данным словам, а сейчас все становится очевидным
custom 52741957060667818105custom 52198725645699721664custom 53796563388024828884
Массовые отлеты озона ❗️ Командам летят 161 фз вне зависимости от метода работы, практически каждый реквизит получает данную блокировку 😭 Озон уже давно барахлит, поэтому воздержитесь от работы по данному банку
custom 53865870888733318296custom 52741957060667818103custom 53684756799375343803
Будние КА 🤪 И так, первыми банками в данной рубрике будут Отп и Зеленый ( в данном случае берем по одному реквизиту каждого банка ) На фото видны промежуточные результаты одной из наших команд 👇 Отп 646.082 Зеленый 560.860 Многие считали, что отп себя изжил, но результаты говорят об обратном Несмотря на чистку отп, о которой я писал в этом посте Клик, остальные реквизиты продолжают работать, предполагаем, что он…
custom 52741957060667818107custom 52198725645699721663custom 53234703153705852853
Билайн жив ✋ Только теперь откупа в тджс работают лишь в определенное время С выплатами на рф всё штатно 😎 Завтра наш ментор заканчивает тесты и всем командам выдадаст актуальный мануал 👍 Для друзей
custom 52198725645699721669custom 52741957060667818103custom 53234703153705852852custom 53796563388024828881
Telegram ⚰️ ? Думаю все видели новость, что телеграм решили замедлять Уже сегодня у некоторых пользователей он работает только через домашний интернет VPN теперь не помогает 😭 Переходим в MAX/ВК ? Для друзей
custom 53796563388024828888custom 52198725645699721664custom 52741957060667818103
Билайн окончательно ⚰️ ? Массовые раздачи 0611 Предположительно Билайн ввел фрод на входящие переводы Будем смотреть за ситуацией дальше Для друзей
custom 52741957060667818106custom 53796563388024828884custom 52198725645699721662custom 52084606732557433171
Переводы на тадж по Билайну лежат уже несколько дней Все думали, что ситуация после выходных изменится, но по итогу ничего не поменялось 😭 Остается переходить на выплаты по рф, по которым проблемно найти объем либо на других операторов 👍 Upd: помимо этого уже прошло первое чтение, где одобрили законопроект, о котором я писал в этом посте: Клик
custom 53796563388024828885custom 52198725645699721664custom 52084606732557433173
По рубрике уже выбрали 2 банка Получилось так, что эти банки уже были у наших команд, поэтому уже завтра покажу вам промежуточные результаты по ним 😃
custom 53234703153705852856custom 52198725645699721664custom 52741957060667818103
Друзья ☝️ Как всегда с 8 по 12 число чистки у отп, вб и озона, в этот раз озон летит и по КА Поэтому отложите данные банки, переждите момент чисток и будет вам счастье 🤑
custom 52198725645699721668custom 52741957060667818107custom 52084606732557433174
REKTOR / Diamond or Dust pinned «Друзья, рад вам представить новую рубрику на канале: «Будние КА» 😋 В этой рубрике мы формируем пул банков, предложенных вами, и выбираем из него 2-3 банка для практического тестирования в реальной работе с контрагентами. Все тесты будут проводится нами и…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rektor_flow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 90,743 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@rektor_flow named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“REKTOR / Diamond or Dust” (@rektor_flow), 60 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rektor_flow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.