Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53506321094573006012
Signed dw○\○

Channel
@rekitRk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
56subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003240701221 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rekitRk |
| Description | лс - @jennrep http://t.me/voprosy?start=hml9r |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rekitRk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 56 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 56 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (2 August 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 432 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
20 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5395480591753844164 | 8 | 40.0% | |
| custom 5350632109457300601 | 5 | 25.0% | |
| custom 5472124085582456055 | 5 | 25.0% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 10.0% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53506321094573006012
Signed dw○\○
🤩🤩🤩🎲🎲🎲🎲🤩🤩🤩 🦴🦴🦴 N̶̶a̶̶t̶̶e̶̶ R̶̶i̶̶v̶̶e̶̶r̶̶ 🦴🦴🦴 ————————————————— ⭐⭐⭐⭐𝐾𝑖𝑟𝑎 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠 ⭐⭐⭐⭐𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑜𝑝𝑝𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡𝑦 ⭐⭐⭐⭐𝑡𝑜 𝑘𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑚𝑒. 🤍🤍 ⭐⭐⭐⭐🦴🦴🦴🦴🦴 ——————🤩🤍🤩——————
custom 53506321094573006012custom 53954805917538441641
Signed dw○\○
😝😝😝
Signed dw○\○
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 С завидным постоянством искупаю все ваши грехи💵 Че, еще не ясно, кто крутой, а кто лохи?💵 💸💸💸💸💸💸💸💸💸💸💸💸 💵ㅤㅤВам еще кажется, что я лох А если вдруг окажется, что я бог? Завсегдатая мои спины, записку «Пни меня» 💵 Сменю на ее эквивалент с надписью «Распни меня» 💸💸💸💸💸💸💸💸💸💸💸💸 character: Byuakyua Togami fd: Danganronpa cosplay by: МяуШин Мью, рт, реакции #косплей
custom 54721240855824560553
Signed dw○\○
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed dw○\○
🤩🤩🤩 𝚁𝚎𝚗 𝙰𝚖𝚊𝚖𝚒𝚢𝚊 𝙹𝙾𝙺𝙴𝚁🥹 — 𝙱𝚞𝚝 𝚜𝚑𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎𝚜 𝚖𝚢 𝚠𝚊𝚝𝚌𝚑 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚖𝚢 𝚍𝚛𝚘𝚙𝚝𝚘𝚙 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚖𝚢 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚊 ♥️ 🥹 𝚋𝚢 𝙼𝚒𝚘🥹🧩🧩🧩🧩🤩🤩🤩 рт—реакции—приветсвуются ♥️
Signed dw○\○
ДА БЛ ТОЛЬКО НЕ 5-6 СЕНТЯБРЯ 😭😭😭
Signed dw○\○
я не увижу осану Йоны
Signed dw○\○
та емае
Signed dw○\○
Дорогие гости нашего пикника, спешим сообщить, что пикник переносится на сентябрь. Для этого есть несколько причин, которые сейчас озвучим: 1. Проблемы с прогнозом погоды. В субботу обещают то дождь, то жару и духоту. Из этих двух зол очень сложно выбрать меньшее 2. Неоднократно поступали предложения перенести пикник. Да, многие сейчас могли подумать, что перенести Можно было бы на следующую неделю, но, к сожалени…
custom 53954805917538441644
Signed dw○\○
ветеренарная клиника
custom 54721240855824560551
Signed Nomin
злаязлая
Signed dw○\○
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @rekitRk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 830,364 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🚏rekit” (@rekitRk), 56 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rekitRk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.