амбассадор чебупиццы 💉 pinned a photo

Channel
амбассадор чебупиццы 💉
@reinshitposter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
169subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002094216351 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reinshitposter |
| Description | анон сообщения — http://t.me/anumsgbot?start=DQaRlGx |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reinshitposter |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 169 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 169 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 167 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 36.0%
- avg views ÷ 169 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 60.8
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 28.9%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (4 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,033 |
| Reactions total | 299 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,520
- Videos
- ≈90
- Links
- ≈46
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 40s
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
299 reactions across 17 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 38 | 12.7% | |
| ❤ | 34 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5233683594550983254 | 32 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5294029379708409108 | 30 | 10.0% | |
| custom 5199673127218470876 | 28 | 9.36% | |
| custom 5197517861089725434 | 26 | 8.70% | |
| custom 5312123724739137724 | 25 | 8.36% | |
| custom 5213143506163364194 | 22 | 7.36% | |
| 💋 | 10 | 3.34% | |
| custom 5305371211516106570 | 9 | 3.01% | |
| custom 5294351820083187861 | 7 | 2.34% | |
| 😍 | 7 | 2.34% | |
| custom 5388625854014183095 | 6 | 2.01% | |
| custom 5220007572571971321 | 5 | 1.67% | |
| custom 5228892640136686679 | 5 | 1.67% | |
| custom 5321041468415047827 | 5 | 1.67% | |
| 💊 | 4 | 1.34% | |
| custom 5188517967574351827 | 3 | 1.00% | |
| custom 5382351903227147475 | 2 | 0.669% | |
| custom 5305658729511799794 | 1 | 0.334% |
Custom emoji. 15 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 299reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ещё один коллаб с @Marlaaaa707 почему бы и нет 🌟 мне понравилось рисовать моего дезертира Козлика
custom 53053712115161065706custom 52288926401366866794custom 51975178610897254343😍1custom 51885179675743518271custom 53210414684150478271
обнову реакций оценити Эминем единственный выживший
custom 53121237247391377245custom 53886258540141830955custom 51975178610897254344custom 53053712115161065703custom 53210414684150478272custom 51885179675743518271custom 52288926401366866791custom 53056587295117997941
ЙОООУ
custom 52200075725719713215🍓2custom 51975178610897254342custom 52940293797084091082💊1💋1😍1custom 51885179675743518271
к вечеру придумаю какие и обновлю
custom 53121237247391377245
Стоит обновить реакты?
- Го77%
- Нынешние нравятся23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🍓4custom 51996731272184708764custom 51975178610897254342custom 52940293797084091082
новий реакт ещё оцените не знаю почему зелёный, но пусть будет
custom 519751786108972543414🍓5custom 53121237247391377245custom 52336835945509832542💊1custom 51996731272184708761
опа, ещё коммишка от @stsarthouse (оформите подписон) на етот раз Ваня Гайка и Кречет пацани сплетничают 🌟
custom 529402937970840910812🍓6😍5custom 51996731272184708764custom 52131435061633641942custom 51975178610897254341
давно не кидала спойлеров под блюром мистер дезертир очень симпатяга
custom 521314350616336419412custom 52940293797084091088🍓3custom 51996731272184708762custom 53823519032271474752💊1custom 53210414684150478271
я скоро буду работать над дизайном своей фан-группировки, а пока что ждите коллаб
custom 53121237247391377249custom 52131435061633641946custom 52943518200831878616💊1
скоро может сяду рисовати 🌟🌟
🍓12custom 51996731272184708765custom 52940293797084091083
эта всё я и @blowmyjoint 🌟🌟 сама видосик сделала, если што
❤9custom 51996731272184708767custom 52336835945509832544🍓2custom 52131435061633641942custom 52943518200831878611
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @reinshitposter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Стоит обновить реакты?
- Го77%
- Нынешние нравятся23%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 328,320 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“амбассадор чебупиццы 💉” (@reinshitposter), 169 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reinshitposter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.