We lose together and win together

Channel
REIGN VIEW CALLZ BSC | ETH |
@reignview
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
44subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001839033945 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reignview |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reignview |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 44 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:07 | 45 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 46 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:39 | 46 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 March 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Dust here Ggs unto the next
Sol 7Zh6wUPRakTkuVAAdoCFnBYSQAmWgjUinADboG3htAhz Gambled here at 2k mc let’s see where it rides Dyor/Nfa
Gm chads
Video, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Hit 8.6k mc not bad for an x2
Sol 5UCpzcYq2FmNLCh1BhhW4Yu5z6qm5kuycm4p91n2xdHv Gambled here hopefully it sends hard
Prelaunch(🔥SOL) Mystery Prelaunch Gambles Channel 🎲 ‼️Enter at your own risk! Wait for Burn/Safety and DYOR‼️ Backed by SOLEX Launchpad. Previous meme went 40X. Low Starting MC. Launch Today between 3 pm to 5 pm UTC https://t.me/Mystery_Launch_SOL
Dipped to 67k now at 125k, hit 130k mc from dip almost x2 for who ever bought the dip
61y6rK1UkEnVdqF4sDMct9pwApEVp7G7TjSgzXd2GBN Been watching this for days now and now it’s on a perfect dip, dev still got some juice left to send it hard. Aped here at $150k mc. https://www.sassyonsolana.com https://t.me/+lIUqk5A5qHwyOGU0 https://twitter.com/SassyOnSolana https://discord.com/invite/V5eyKfhKvb Nfa/dyor.
https://claimyoursol.com/lffIzdMbuoYnQSDUvZSe If you trade on sol with phantom, good news, you can claim back some portion of your sol back to your wallet and it’s safe
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @reignview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@reignview named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“REIGN VIEW CALLZ BSC | ETH |” (@reignview), 44 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reignview.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.