Channel
@reformthestate
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
401subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001954484766 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reformthestate |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reformthestate |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 401 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 400 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 400 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 June 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 675 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
147 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | 32 | 21.8% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 21.8% | |
| 👍 | 29 | 19.7% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 11.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 6.80% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 6.12% | |
| 👎 | 9 | 6.12% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 4.08% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"If the present development of France should continue for another three hundred years, the last bit of Frankish blood will perish in the European-African mulatto state which is in the process of formation." - Mein Kampf
⚡8
“If a people no longer possesses the energy or the will to maintain itself in the sphere of politics, the latter will not thereby vanish from the world. Only a weak people will disappear.” Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political
🔥1
remain in the country, lie boldly and freely, blaspheme, curse, and steal. Shouldn't the impious Jews laugh up theirsleeves because we let them make such fools of us and because we spend our money to enable them to remain in the country and to practice every malice? Over and above that we let them get rich on our sweat and blood, while we remain poor and they suck the marrow from our bones How does it happen that we…
🔥10
“Judeo-Christian” became the standardized descriptor for the invidious liberalism which held that Western values rest upon an “Abrahamic consensus. Christ and the Bible, upon whose shoulders rested our nation, were shoved aside to make way for an intruder in their midst, the Jew. The Jew took a seat, and with it the credit due Christ alone.“Judeo Christianity” is proceeding under the same revisionist banner as that m…
👏11🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
💯6❤5🔥1
The Naturalization Act of 1790 was the first U.S. law to define who could become a citizen. Signed into law by George Washington himself, the act highlights how the Founders perceived a degree of common kinship as integral to the state. @Kinism
👍3🔥1
“Now touching the country wherein every one is born and brought up; every man doth well esteem of it, love it, and wish to advance it; every man doth deck it with his virtue and prowess; every one doth help it with all sorts of benefits, stoutly defending it, and valiantly fighting for it, if need be, to save it from violent robbers … Now what is he, that can abide to behold such a commonweal, the country where he is…
🔥1
"That foreigners are not to be placed at the helm of the commonwealth is proved by the following arguments:.... (4) Because natives, being born in that very soil which they come to rule and sufficiently acquainted with the customs and minds of the province, care better for the known affairs of the fatherland, and pursue their subjects with greater love and benevolence." ~Fredrick Wendelin
👍7🔥1
We must recognize this as the apostasy that it is. The Scofield Reference Bible allowed our most ancient enemy to advance its agenda by way of Christian hands, mouths, and money, indoctrinating whole generations of American Christians that they must do whatever it takes to support the State of Israel because “the Bible tells them so.” -The Sword of Christ
👏6
Photo, posted without a caption
New England Puritan, Samuel Sewall, wrote about race in 1700 on race in his anti-slavery tract
Rutherford on the legitimacy of militias organized under duly constituted authority and the duty to help neighboring brethren. “The host of men that helped David against king Saul (1 Sam. xxii. 2) entered in a lawful war, and (1 Chron. xii. 18) Amasa, by the Spirit of the Lord, blesseth his helpers,—‘Peace, peace be unto thee, and peace be unto thy helpers, for thy God helpeth thee.’ Therefore, peace must be to the …
🔥7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @reformthestate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 260,288 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“♱R E F O R M A T I O N ♱” (@reformthestate), 401 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reformthestate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.