Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Рe-Форма | Фестиваль

@reforma_fest

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

71subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003987742879
TypeChannel
Username@reforma_fest
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 23 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/reforma_fest

Growth

707170.57 August 2026 — 70 subscribers9 August 2026 — 70 subscribers13 August 2026 — 71 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 70–71 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 08:0871+1
9 Aug 2026, 23:3270no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:4570first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
119.3%
avg views ÷ 71 subscribers
Avg views / post
84.7
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held17 (23 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,440
Reactions total166
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

166 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54160252456917135053621.7%
2515.1%
🔥2012.0%
custom 54136141799007593621810.8%
custom 5415819907600260699127.23%
custom 5413648634128409691116.63%
custom 541344160811480428395.42%
🥰95.42%
custom 541564599578450841263.61%
👍63.61%
👏63.61%
custom 541561125379405237153.01%
custom 541605510859932465531.81%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 166reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC61 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💥 Церемония награждения участников Ре-Формы Время летит незаметно! Кажется, только стартовал приём заявок, а мы уже на финишной прямой. 30 сентября состоится главное событие фестиваля Оно всё ближе, и мы вот-вот раскроем, какие невероятные подарки и сюрпризы ждут победителей. Поверьте, вы даже не представляете, что мы для вас приготовили! Это будет вечер, который запомнится надолго, поэтому выбирайте лучшие наряд

5

7 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC59 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥4custom 54136141799007593623👍2custom 54160252456917135052custom 54160551085993246551

6 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC59 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍2custom 54136486341284096912custom 54158199076002606992🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTC50 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

4custom 54160252456917135052custom 54160551085993246552

4 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC51 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

3custom 54134416081148042832custom 54158199076002606992

3 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC51 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 54156459957845084125🔥4custom 54136141799007593624custom 54160252456917135052

1 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC199 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 54136141799007593625custom 54136486341284096915custom 54160252456917135054

31 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTC72 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💬 Первая неделя откровений от жюри уже позади. Мы надеемся, что советы некоторых наших экспертов помогли взглянуть на свои проекты по-новому. Может быть, вы уже пересобрали кейс или просто обратили внимание на детали, которые раньше не замечали? А пока заявки проходят техническую проверку, самое время познакомиться друг с другом. Оставляйте в комментариях ссылку на своё портфолио, Behance, личный сайт или любимый

6custom 54160252456917135054custom 54158199076002606993

31 Jul 2026, 06:40 UTC70 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 54134416081148042833custom 54136141799007593623custom 54160252456917135053👏2🔥2👍1

29 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC69 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

4custom 54134416081148042833custom 54160252456917135053

29 Jul 2026, 06:40 UTC76 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 54160252456917135055👏3custom 54136486341284096912custom 54134416081148042831custom 54156112537940523711

27 Jul 2026, 14:15 UTC109 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Эта неделя будет особенной! Мы долго готовились к этому моменту — и наконец настало время раскрыть карты. Всю ближайшую неделю мы будем знакомить вас с профессионалами индустрии — нашими приглашёнными экспертами! Кого же встретят подписчики и участники конкурса? От кого получат тот самый совет, который поможет докрутить проект до идеала и покорить жюри? Вас ждут мощные инсайты, разбор пути в креативной сфере и

custom 54160252456917135053🔥1custom 54156112537940523711custom 54158199076002606991

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @reforma_fest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jul 2026, 09:13 UTCAnonymous Poll15 voters

Как вы справляетесь с ожиданием?

  1. 🙂40%
  2. 😌33%
  3. 😅0%
  4. 🤞33%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 573,958 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рe-Форма | Фестиваль” (@reforma_fest), 71 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reforma_fest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.