Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
5 measurements spanning 49 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 148–154 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 00:20
150
+1
13 Sept 2026, 05:15
149
-2
6 Sept 2026, 05:42
151
-2
8 Aug 2026, 19:16
153
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:59
153
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 42s
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
45 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
20
44.4%
❤
13
28.9%
🔥
6
13.3%
👏
2
4.44%
😁
2
4.44%
🙈
2
4.44%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧿 😃🥹🥰🥰😉🙃🙃🥲😋😀- удивительный фестиваль авторской анимации, где необычные мультфильмы на полевом экране в темное время суток- это лишь малая часть безумия.
Мне нравится это сумасшествие, оно доброе и с тонким юмором. Целый день я хожу по полю - вдоль, поперек, пересекая его сотни и тысячи раз разными тропинками и в спонтанном порядке изучая странные арт - объекты: например,
😕избушка на осьминожьих щупальцах, где сидит…
☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️
☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️ ☁️☁️
Представьте классическую бытовую сцену. Муж заходит на кухню и говорит жене:
Из-за того, что ты не помыла посуду, наш сын сегодня получил двойку и плачет в комнате!»
Звучит странно: где посуда, а где успеваемость ребенка? 😳
В жизни и в близких отношениях мы периодически сталкиваемся с похожей механикой, когда звучит фраза:
Из-за твоего поведения близкий человек теперь в глубоко…
Деструктивная семейная динамика и сложные случаи в практике психолога
🔹 Открытый вебинар школы MHC 5 июля.
Работа с семьёй нередко напоминает антикризисное управление: специалист входит в систему, где много боли, напряжения и противоречивых интересов, и ему приходится удерживать процесс, не теряя опоры самому. Сложнее всего, когда в семейной системе есть агрессия или у кого-то из её членов выражены расстройства ли…
ЭЗОТЕРИКА И ПСИХОТЕРАПИЯ: ГРАНИ ДОПУСТИМОГО.
🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️ 🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️
🕊️Приглашаем вас на прямой эфир 6 июля (понедельник), в 21.30 по МСК. Трансляция пройдет в нашей группе ВКонтакте.
Благодаря инсайдерской информации мы узнали, что наша любимая председательница Ассоциации "СОЛЬ", Ангелина Чугуева, оказывается, практикует осознанные сновидения, причём...с помощью маникюра!
А уважаемый, и не менее любимый член наше…
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️
☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️⏺
☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️
❗Феномен социально успешного автора насилия представляет собой одну из самых сложных и этически заряженных проблем в терапевтической практике.
В общественном сознании образ автора насилия до сих пор часто связывается с маргинальностью или явной деструктивностью, однако реальность показывает, что за закрытыми дверями психологическое давление и контроль нередко развор…
💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘💘 💘💘💘
В психотерапевтической практике мы привычно ищем опоры в реальной жизни, но иногда самые глубокие инсайты приходят из пограничных состояний сознания.
😯На днях мне довелось побывать на лекции и практике тибетского ламы. Его появление совпало с удивительным моментом: в самом начале Лама провел ритуал вызова духов, предупредив, что мы можем заметить знаки их присутствия. И ровно в эту секунду небо на…
😍😉😆🥲😘🥹😇🥲
🥰😄😉🥲😚 😆🥹😘🥹☺️
В семьях, где присутствует домашнее насилие, дети адаптируются к хроническому стрессу мгновенно. Пока взрослые поглощены конфликтами или глухой изоляцией, ребенок бессознательно берет на себя миссию регулятора атмосферы в доме.
🩷В психотерапии этот феномен называют
☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️
- когда из-за дефицита родительской зрелости ребенок функционально меняется местами со взросл…
Опыт общения с тибетским Ламой и осознанные сновидения55%
12 архетипов авангарда + тест на мой архетип18%
А не я ли тот самый родитель своим родителям?45%
The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @refleksiacom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 140%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Опыт общения с тибетским Ламой и осознанные сновидения55%
12 архетипов авангарда + тест на мой архетип18%
А не я ли тот самый родитель своим родителям?45%
The shares total 145%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 20 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Эй, хочешь немного Рефлексии? Refleksia.ru” (@refleksiacom), 150 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/refleksiacom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.