Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for шесть недель рыбьего жира

Channel

шесть недель рыбьего жира

@reeterrr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

432subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003618984599
TypeChannel
Username@reeterrr
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/reeterrr

Growth

423432427.510 August 2026 — 432 subscribers11 August 2026 — 431 subscribers18 August 2026 — 430 subscribers25 August 2026 — 423 subscribers2 September 2026 — 432 subscribers10 August 20262 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 422–433 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 05:34432+9
25 Aug 2026, 20:03423-7
18 Aug 2026, 04:53430-1
11 Aug 2026, 13:12431-1
10 Aug 2026, 22:15432first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 13s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

420 reactions across 17 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
14735.0%
❤‍🔥4410.5%
🍾419.76%
🔥368.57%
🍌245.71%
💘215.00%
🙏194.52%
🤗163.81%
😢122.86%
🥰102.38%
🍓81.90%
👀81.90%
🕊71.67%
🏆61.43%
👏61.43%
🐳51.19%
30.714%
🎉20.476%
🆒10.238%
💋10.238%
3 further kinds30.714%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 420 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC362 views27 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @eshkrmePhoto

бью Руслана за один рубль

💘12🙏6🍌4🎉2🍓1🍾1🏆1

2 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC431 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

правда да???

🍌12🤗97🐳5💯1

2 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC424 views39 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

на память оставляю

🍾1714🍓5🍌1💋1🆒1

2 Aug 2026, 16:13 UTC392 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

дроп в тиктоке https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4AwBdEW/

2🏆21🕊1

2 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC421 views46 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

21🥰9👏6🕊51🏆1💘1🤪1

1 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC443 views33 reactionsread 10 August 2026

если что кружок долго грузился я только что вышел с фильма непокой это лучший фильм в моей жизни или худший фильм в моей жизни или что это блять вообще такое было

17🙏8❤‍🔥6🍓1🥰1

1 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC441 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

21❤‍🔥7💘6

1 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC436 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

и куда это мы таким составом??

10❤‍🔥4

23 Jul 2026, 22:38 UTC740 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ссылку на него тоже оставляю тогда https://www.tiktok.com/@oduvanonavudo?_r=1&_t=ZS-98HhbfIgrzA

3🍌1🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 22:35 UTC707 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026

чувак час назад на меня подписался буквально, мы с ним не общались совсем даже

14🍌2🤗1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @reeterrr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“шесть недель рыбьего жира” (@reeterrr), 432 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reeterrr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.