Channel
@reels_center
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
222subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001414328366 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @reels_center |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/reels_center |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 222 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 224 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:40 | 224 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 25 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
25 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 44.0% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 16.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 12.0% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 12.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 8.00% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 8.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 14 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Недавно я решила провести один эксперимент. Я создала свою нейромодель 🤖 и завела для неё отдельную страницу. Мне было очень интересно проверить одну гипотезу: можно ли с помощью нейросетей создать блог и привлекать подписчиков. Я начала публиковать ролики с этой моделью. И на 13-м ролике произошло то, чего я и хотела проверить. Видео начало набирать просмотры и привело более 1500 новых подписчиков 📈 Но самое и…
❤1👏1🔥1🥰1
Всем привет. Сегодня началась новая страница жизни моей ИИ - модели, ее зовут Алекса🙌🏼 Буду рада вашей поддержки 🫂 Ее страница 👇 https://www.instagram.com/aleksa_gerlen?igsh=MWdpNWY4ZHcwcGhkcw%3D%3D&utm_source=qr
❤2👏1🥰1
🔉Подкаст: «Как пользоваться ИИ и не потерять себя»
❤1👏1🔥1
Какая бы Вас зацепила?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
Новая возможность в Instagram Reels: кликабельные ссылки Раньше путь клиента выглядел так: Reels → переход в профиль → поиск ссылки в шапке → клик → переход (и на каждом этапе теряли 30–50% людей) Теперь можно так: Rees с кликабельной ссылкой → клик прямо в видео → человек сразу попадает куда нужно Что это меняет для контент-воронки: ✅ Каждый Reels = точка входа Теперь любой ролик можно связать с конкретным этапом…
💇♀️ Инструкция для бьюти-мастеров и тех, кто хочет изменить образ ✨ Сомневаетесь в новой стрижке или цвете? Примерьте через нейросеть! Если вы бьюти-мастер — покажите клиенту результат ДО похода в салон Если планируете изменить образ — убедитесь, что новая причёска или окрашивание вам идёт Примерка любой стрижки и цвета волос через ИИ за 1 минуту — без риска, ножниц и краски👇 📋 Пошаговый гайд Шаг 1: Открой Syntex…
❤2👍1
ИИ-контент в 2026 — это как “вторые руки” для твоего блога и продаж. Если раньше нейросети были про «вау, прикольно», то сейчас это способ делать контент стабильно: без съёмок, без вечного “не успеваю”, без выгорания. Пока кто-то ждёт вдохновения, другие уже выпускают ролики, тестируют идеи и превращают внимание в заявки и продажи💰 Хочешь так же? Напиши «КОНТЕНТ» — отправлю программу и детали обучения.
Новый год — и хочется не «начать новую жизнь», а просто понять: что со мной происходит и куда я иду. Я уже попробовала свой AI‑промпт для разбора личности по дате рождения — и, честно, была в шоке, насколько точно он описал меня (многие вещи мне раньше один в один говорил мой нумеролог). Это не «магия» и не страшилки, а такой умный самоанализ: сильные стороны, где я сама себе мешаю, деньги/мотивация/реализация + фо…
👎4👍2
Все подводят итоги года: цифры, победы, «посмотрите, какая я молодец».😁 А я долго думала — писать ли мне такой пост, потому что не люблю хвастаться и честно… казалось, что особых достижений у меня нет. Этот год у меня прошёл в заботе о здоровье и моральном состоянии.❤️ Были порывы всё бросить — просто потому что сил не было. И вот ближе к Новому году случилось моё маленькое чудо: залетел ролик, и на меня подписал…
❤3
Channel photo removed
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @reels_center. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какая бы Вас зацепила?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 14 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Reels Стратегия + Нейросети” (@reels_center), 222 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/reels_center.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.