Channel name was changed to «🔒𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘃𝗲𝗻𝗼𝗺 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼»

Channel
🔒𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘃𝗲𝗻𝗼𝗺 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼
@redvenomskie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
47subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002668615948 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @redvenomskie |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/redvenomskie |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 47 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 49 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 51 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 53 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:30 | 55 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 55 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
96 reactions across 5 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💔 | 44 | 45.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5296406167365378121 | 8 | 8.33% | |
| custom 5888497138882582026 | 7 | 7.29% | |
| custom 5318893671234418145 | 5 | 5.21% | |
| custom 5359448139717699631 | 5 | 5.21% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 5.21% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 3.13% | |
| custom 5235540935978270094 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| custom 5235780062577440429 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| custom 5235931898261290971 | 2 | 2.08% | |
| custom 5316697143354863199 | 1 | 1.04% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.04% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2025 to 1 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Привет Поздравляю с первым днём зимы, пусть она пройдёт спокойно и приятно Сообщаю что флуд закрывается официально и навсегда (клянусь). Все союзы и сотрудничества прекращаются. Спасибо всем кто был с нами!
💔35❤🔥8custom 52964061673653781216custom 58884971388825820266custom 53188936712344181453custom 53594481397176996313❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
закрываемся?
💔9❤🔥2💯2
🔤оллаб 🔤лудов ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ ➿ как участвовать ?? 😻 😻 написать « @юзфлуда - @вашюз» . 😻 сделать рп к себе в инфо. 😻 подписаться на инфо. 😻 скрины доказательства. 🔤еста :: О1. @starrystarline ‐ @raaymas О2. @mushly_flood - @rab_Shuhua О3. @shiningfloodinffo - @starshhine_e О4. @celineinfoflood - @SM3LLYR3CH4L О5. @infodungeonofmorons - @staa_aay О6. @flood_kdramas - @nnx_s О7. @sometimesfloo — @guaraQew 08. @layfldinfo…
Signed Suzyana
с обновой красивые, облизываю экран, сочно
Signed Suzyana
Кажется, в понедельник будет много разрывов...
💯2
Signed Suzyana
доброе утро ред веном и союзницы, уходим на выходные!
Signed Suzyana
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Suzyana
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Suzyana
на ежедневный рп 1. https://t.me/redvenomskie/1317 2. https://t.me/redvenomskie/1790
Signed Suzyana
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @redvenomskie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@celineinfoflood · 281 postзакрыты 𝔇υⲛⳋⲉⲟⲛ ᶦᶰᶠᵒ
@infodungeonofmorons · 931 postзакрыты🔒 𝗆υׁׅ𝗌hׁׅ֮𝗅𝗒 ܻ⨍𝗅𝗈𝗈ժׁׅ݊
@mushly_flood · 351 post@ . . пęрęxøðниķ . .
@nnx_s · 41 postпереходник
@raaymas · 21 postзакрыты ( 👾 ) ``ઽꫝꪱꪀꫀꪶꪱꪀꫀ. . 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑑
@shiningfloodinffo · 301 post🔒закрытЫ _ * @ 𝐒ometimes FLD³ ⚠️
@sometimesfloo · 1691 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 8
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 7
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@redvenomskie named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 17 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔒𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘃𝗲𝗻𝗼𝗺 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗼” (@redvenomskie), 47 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redvenomskie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.