Channel
@redoer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
156subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001192167943 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @redoer |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/redoer |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 156 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 156 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 15 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
40 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 60.0% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 27.5% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 7.50% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.50% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2025 to 24 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Смотрим на то, чем я занимался с прошлого октября. Удивительно, как весь тот пройденный мной путь оказывается сейчас в руках у друзей, родителей, знакомых и многих совершенно не знакомых людей. Рад, что путь этот связан с музыкой, рад что выпал он на серьёзное обновление. Надеюсь, что спустя время буду рад за результат, свои работы только спустя год (как минимум) могу вменяемо оценить. А пока только подглядываю в тел…
❤12
На праздниках произошло пополнение в фотиках. В серванте у родителей была найдена их первая (и единственная) семейная мыльница. Компактная и максимально простая. Довольно весело с ней ходить, пока не видишь её мыльную сущность на фотографиях
🔥8
Ребят, с Новым годом! Впереди праздники и долгожданный отдых. Желаю всем хорошо отдохнуть, освободить место для новых идей и запастись силами для их воплощения ✨
❤10👍1
Но можно попробовать проникнуть в разум нашего потрошителя — стать им, понять его дизайн. Представим, что в каком-то году кому-то понадобилось локализовать титры на русский. Возможно, у него даже был оригинальный шрифт. Ну не трассировкой же оригинала заниматься ради создания кириллицы? Правда ведь? Так или иначе, в руках безумного гения оказывается латиница, которой нужно всего несколько надрезов, чтобы превратиться…
😁3❤1💯1
Помимо ответа, меня ждало ещё и озарение, до которого стоило додуматься сразу: посмотреть оригинальные титры! Вот она наша жертва — Grotesque No. 9, он же Bureau Grot. Английский гротеск начала XX века, который позже оцифровали и расширили другими начертаниями. И всё было бы неплохо, если бы он не попался нашему потрошителю. Поиски по названиям шрифтов + «кириллица скачать вк» в разных вариациях ни к чему не привели,…
🔥3❤1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @redoer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,140,005 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“redoer” (@redoer), 156 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redoer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.