Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

RED FLAGS

@redflags_token

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

331subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002445369740
TypeChannel
Username@redflags_token
DescriptionНаведём суету на Blum! Реклама и коллабы: @rftoken_adm Website: redflags.wtf Game: @rflags_bot NFT: https://getgems.io/rftoken Чат товарищей: https://t.me/+WENArMesqa4xZmMy
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/redflags_token

Growth

3317 Aug 2026, 15:55 — 331 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:16 — 331 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:558 Aug 2026, 07:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 330–332 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:16331no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:55331first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
250
Videos
43
Links
252

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6m 42s
Average length
2m 14s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

365 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 525352262831180865213336.4%
custom 525394190301924337011230.7%
custom 52538987042381817955916.2%
custom 5289852850430572862339.04%
custom 5289888721997430148164.38%
custom 5253680648748564935123.29%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 365reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 October 2025 to 10 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
98
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 20 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
25
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @redflags_token. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 October 2025 to 10 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Dec 2025, 19:08 UTC≈1,610 views27 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏳️ Всем товарищам на новогодний стол

custom 525352262831180865212custom 52538987042381817959custom 52539419030192433706

3 Dec 2025, 09:21 UTC≈1,950 views27 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏳️ Так получилось, что канал https://t.me/deathtoners перешёл ко мне 🏳️ Планирую там проводить анализ токенов, писать свое (и не только) мнение по рынку и мемам 🏳️ Суть будет в создании сообщества deathTONers 🏳️ Каждый DeathTONer — это душа, вернувшаяся в блокчейн после того, как её ликвидировали где-то в мемах или на бирже 🏳️ Тон не забирает — Тон возвращает 🏳️ И теперь мы здесь, чтобы забрать своё 🪙 Подписыва

custom 525394190301924337011custom 52538987042381817959custom 52535226283118086527

30 Nov 2025, 11:56 UTC≈1,670 views24 reactions25 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏳️ Товарищи, я не понимаю зачем вы покупаете, когда поезд уже давно ушел 🏳️ Нужно было покупать, когда это было нужно и когда вас просили поддержать и проявить активность 🏳️ Проект заморожен и развиваться не будет ближайший год 🏳️ Когда подойдут сроки вывода стейкинга, я всем выведу естественно 🏳️ Думаете, что вы самые хитрые и сейчас купите за 25-50 тон миллионы RF и вас повезут наверх? 🏳️ Ответ-НЕТ. У команды

custom 525352262831180865210custom 52539419030192433707custom 52538987042381817955custom 52898528504305728622

27 Nov 2025, 11:44 UTC≈1,190 views17 reactions11 Starsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kostiadesignerVideo

Анонс ролика про девов Надеюсь что затрону очень важную и неприятную для многих тему. Но всегда есть две стороны медали, о второй просто привыкли молчать. Поделитесь этим постом со своими друзьями, в приватках, чатах. Я думаю многим будет интересно, особенно тем, кто лично пережил события, связанные с этими проектами. В ролике примут участие: t.me/epicclashstory t.me/pipromems #интервью #монолог #ton

custom 52535226283118086528custom 52539419030192433705custom 52536806487485649354

25 Nov 2025, 18:04 UTC≈1,140 views18 reactions14 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

🏳️ Креативненько у кого-то получилось

custom 52535226283118086528custom 52898887219974301486custom 52538987042381817954

25 Nov 2025, 15:55 UTC≈1,070 views0 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026

🪙 $ONO 150.000.000 lock: https://tonraffles.app/lock/EQDfMR5MP-I3908_KTMYZxs_NdwHa2OK3DOHyPElGAEtM988/EQBt6umxhLVBXd4HcQmbpSWzjwi8hALZT2nQS7emBailFsnD 🪙 Качать никто не будет. Написано же "have fun"

25 Nov 2025, 15:34 UTC≈1,160 views10 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏳️ ONOMANCY — when the anus becomes power 🏳️ Have fun!

custom 528988872199743014810

24 Nov 2025, 13:03 UTC≈1,200 views19 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

🎉 Представляем Mimirepublic — соревнование токенов OG10! 🎉 Организатор: Ownership Coin🗄️, «У них есть Memerepublic… а у нас — Mimirepublic — с нарративом и компаньонками!» Экосистема OG10 вступает на поле дружеской битвы за Вайб, Объёмы торгов и Силу Комьюнити. Как определяются победители? 📈 Объёмы торгов 💰 Рыночная капитализация 💧 Ликвидность 👥 Количество холдеров 😼 Общий вайб, «ощущение» и сила нарратива 🏆

custom 52535226283118086529custom 52536806487485649355custom 52539419030192433705

22 Nov 2025, 21:44 UTC903 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

То, что нужно знать на сегодня: 1. Крипторынок переживает резкую коррекцию, сопровождающуюся массовым уходом инвесторов из самых рискованных активов. 2. Мемкойны опустились до самого низкого уровня 2025 года, потеряв 66 % своей стоимости с начала года. Всего за 24 часа из капитализации мемкойнов исчезло более 5 миллиардов долларов, несмотря на рост объемов торгов. 3. Общая капитализация крипторынка за три недели с

custom 52538987042381817957custom 52535226283118086523custom 52536806487485649353custom 52539419030192433702

21 Nov 2025, 19:29 UTC899 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🏳️ LAMBO win 2nd week 💪 Congrats! 🪙 https://t.me/lambospeak_RU

custom 52535226283118086525custom 52539419030192433703custom 52898528504305728623

14 Nov 2025, 14:19 UTC≈1,020 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❤️Ton Meme Republic has completed its first week. 🦆No matter how complex the formula is, it can’t measure your enthusiasm or the true potential of the blockchain. 🍾The results of Week One will be announced next week after a 100k contribution is made to the winner — so no one can predict the outcome in advance. Everything will remain fair and transparent. 😏We are not revealing the formula to avoid any market manipu

custom 52898528504305728629custom 52535226283118086526custom 52538987042381817955

12 Nov 2025, 20:22 UTC808 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @kostiadesignerVideo

Interview with a representative of the OG 10 team. As part of the event I organized, you allocated some of your tokens. Let me remind you that every 50k CCATS was equal to 10 seconds of interview time. I decided to increase the time so that you could hear as much information as possible about our Malaysian friends. You can support me here if you want to see more interviews with different projects and devs. UQB2Ry8e

custom 525352262831180865211custom 52539419030192433707custom 52538987042381817956

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @redflags_token. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 427,993 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“RED FLAGS” (@redflags_token), 331 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redflags_token.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.