Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CROSSCHECK YUK!

@redbullnih

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

22subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003408835778
TypeChannel
Username@redbullnih
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 6 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/redbullnih

Growth

2214 Aug 2026, 19:25 — 22 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 19:31 — 22 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 19:2514 Aug 2026, 19:31
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:3122no change
14 Aug 2026, 19:2522first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

99 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5555.6%
2626.3%
😢1717.2%
👍11.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2025 to 9 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Dec 2025, 15:42 UTC≈1,310 views17 reactionsread 14 August 2026

hi, cortis campaign apple kah? baru baca di base

😢17

6 Dec 2025, 13:41 UTC≈2,160 views15 reactionsread 14 August 2026

intinya, personal boycott boleh, tapi tetap harus paham konteks, crosscheck informasi, dan jangan gampang terseret narasi berlebihan. setiap keputusan kita harus rasional, bukan panik moral. awareness itu penting, tapi jangan sampai salah kaprah bikin kita nyebarin info yang nggak tepat.

15

6 Dec 2025, 13:41 UTC≈2,150 views28 reactionsread 14 August 2026

jadi gini, buat kalian yang merasa mau boycott red bull, silakan aja. itu hak pribadi kalian, sah sah aja. tapi satu yang harus diingat, jangan bikin narasi hiperbola seolah red bull itu aktor utama konflik atau sponsor langsung perang di palestina. fakta fakta ekonomi, pajak, gaji pegawai, skala operasi, semuanya jelas minor dan komersial, bukan politik atau militer.

🔥217

6 Dec 2025, 13:41 UTC≈2,090 views0 reactionsread 14 August 2026

boleh hati hati kalau mau boycott, itu personal choice, tapi jangan digede gedein. red bull nggak masuk bds list prioritas, aktivitas mereka di israel komersial, minor, dan non politik. pajak dan gaji pegawai lokal itu standar, bukan funding langsung buat konflik.

6 Dec 2025, 13:41 UTC≈2,000 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

1

6 Dec 2025, 13:40 UTC≈1,940 views0 reactionsread 14 August 2026

keduanya, secara proporsi, red bull di israel itu kecil banget skalanya. mereka udah downgrade market share sejak 2013, marketing dikurangin drastis, jadi kontribusi ekonominya minor. itu berarti efek finansialnya ke negara, APALAGI BUAT KEBIJAKAN MILITER, NYARIS NGGAK SIGNIFIKAN LAH 😭😭 sebenernya kalian ini paham atau enggak?

6 Dec 2025, 13:39 UTC≈1,850 viewsread 14 August 2026

pertama, red bull itu cuma menjalankan operasi bisnis normal: jualan, distribusi, bayar pajak standar, gaji pegawai lokal. itu aktivitas ekonomi biasa, sama kaya perusahaan lain di negara mana pun. klaim kalau semua pajak yang masuk otomatis dipakai buat militer atau kebijakan politik israel itu nggak bisa dibuktikan langsung. kita tau mekanisme anggaran negara itu kompleks, banyak aliran dan prioritas, nggak mungkin

6 Dec 2025, 13:38 UTC≈1,620 viewsread 14 August 2026

Tapi pada akhirnya, kita juga nggak bisa menutup mata bahwa pajak yang masuk ke negara, termasuk Israel, akan tetap berputar dalam mekanisme negara tersebut, entah ke sektor politik, keamanan, atau militer. Kita tahu bagaimana alokasi anggaran mereka bekerja, dan salah satu keluaran dari anggaran itu adalah pendanaan senjata yang digunakan dalam konflik yang terus melukai saudara-saudara kita di Palestina. Jadi meski

6 Dec 2025, 13:37 UTC≈1,380 viewsread 14 August 2026

Walaupun sampai sekarang belum ada bukti publik yang benar-benar jelas dan tegas bahwa Red Bull secara politik atau militer mendukung Israel, bukan berarti kita harus hanyut dan akhirnya tetap memakai Muse yang sempat beroperasi bersama brand tersebut. Sebab pada akhirnya, apa pun bentuk kerja sama yang berhubungan dengan sebuah perusahaan yang berkontribusi pada “pajak, pekerja lokal,” dan aktivitas ekonomi di wilay

6 Dec 2025, 13:33 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 14 August 2026

TAPI BUAT RED BULL, SKALA OPERASINYA KECIL SEJAK 2013 😭😭 jadi kontribusi ekonominya tidak besar dibanding perusahaan prioritas di BDS list yang keterlibatannya langsung dan signifikan.

6 Dec 2025, 13:33 UTC≈1,270 views0 reactionsread 14 August 2026

nah secara teknis, setiap perusahaan asing yang beroperasi di suatu negara "menambah" ekonomi negara itu.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @redbullnih. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,411,407 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CROSSCHECK YUK!” (@redbullnih), 22 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redbullnih.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.