Channel
@redbubblebum
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
136subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003554287678 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @redbubblebum |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/redbubblebum |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 136 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 136 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (1 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,292 |
| Reactions total | 183 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
183 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5406647635572459256 | 56 | 30.6% | |
| custom 5330299979091185239 | 44 | 24.0% | |
| custom 5397685847006943596 | 21 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5397597701393129738 | 17 | 9.29% | |
| custom 5470122781146381332 | 16 | 8.74% | |
| custom 5249320539683586988 | 7 | 3.83% | |
| custom 5397894470748382071 | 7 | 3.83% | |
| custom 5361960540967045174 | 5 | 2.73% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.64% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.64% | |
| custom 5221930566869352495 | 2 | 1.09% | |
| custom 5330360739993521425 | 2 | 1.09% |
Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 183reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
f1 × dnd classes mark webber as ranger Far from the bustle of cities and towns, past the hedges that shelter the most distant farms from the terrors of the wild, amid the dense-packed trees of trackless forests and across wide and empty plains, rangers keep their unending watch.
custom 53975977013931297384
f1 × dnd classes jenson button as bard Whether scholar, skald, or scoundrel, a bard weaves magic through words and music to inspire allies, demoralize foes, manipulate minds, create illusions, and even heal wounds. The bard is a master of song, speech, and the magic they contain.
custom 540664763557245925614custom 53619605409670451745custom 53302999790911852393
эту штуку я доделала ток из-за оскара в спиритах🙂 #F1
custom 52493205396835869887custom 52219305668693524952
почему каждый раз когда я пощу новое видео в тикток, от меня отписывается один человек это какой-то налог ввели?
custom 54701227811463813327🤔3
по-моему это была заставка гран-при монако в 2009 или типа того
custom 533029997909118523910
так-то вы все за рулем ну ладно
custom 533029997909118523918custom 54701227811463813329custom 53978944707483820717custom 53303607399935214252
сегодня....... видос.......
custom 54066476355724592567
это дает мне столько надежды, вы не представляете сама мысль, что человеческая дружба может столько длиться и столько перенести....... какой хороший день чтобы быть человеком🤩🤩🤩
custom 540664763557245925614🥰3
Мика и Дэвид, как пишут продюсеры, как старая супружеская пара 🥰 Едут вместе в турне с 15 сентября по городам Хир ми аут ландоскары через 30 лет @fianawilke
custom 533029997909118523913
раз у нас тут летний перерыв и вы тоже вдруг решите отдохнуть от автоспортивной санта барбары, то у меня теперь есть щитпост канал!!! не знаю еще что конкретно там будет, скорее всего просто моя бесконечная болтовня о несуществующих параллелях во всех моих бесконечных фд, короче на ваше усмотрение!!
custom 53976858470069435964
mark did you ever honestly
custom 539759770139312973813
я клянусь, джоскары в этом сезоне это буквально хансри в kcd2, где они проходит все круги ада, колодки, виселицы, темницы, унижения, предательства, лишения, но зато вместе!! audentes fortuna juvat
custom 54066476355724592567custom 53976858470069435964
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @redbubblebum. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 771,482 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“редбул убивает” (@redbubblebum), 136 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redbubblebum.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.