Channel
@redaltcoins
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
177subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001799904146 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @redaltcoins |
| Created | Between 1 May 2022 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/redaltcoins |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 177 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 177 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 25 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 18 months. If they remain inactive for the next 8 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
After Ai, gamefi is heating up. $LOKA is my bet so copped some only 17M$ mc
Sticker, posted without a caption
Longed STMX here
Photo, posted without a caption
Damn tf
The @BabySmurf9000 X account actually belongs to Elon Musk as stated by him in his most recent livestream at 9 minutes and 10 seconds into the broadcast. Don’t believe us? 😁 Watch for yourself: https://x.com/cyb3rgam3r420/status/1708708034396951029?s=46&t=dkd6z0aH9v7-6KvzTxMs5w Look at the X account and see who he follows/interacts with: https://x.com/babysmurf9000 Don’t fade the $BS9000 Army :)
Sticker, posted without a caption
You guys are savage
BabySmurf9000 Buy! 💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯 🔀 Spent $3,594.78 (1.99 WETH) 🔀 Got 17,917,857 BS9000 👤 Buyer / TX 🪙 New Holder 💸 Market Cap $200,625 DexTools | Screener | Buy | Trending
Bought some babysmurf, it’s Elon alt account and narrative is perfect with SmurfCat at 25M$. 0/0 tax, lp burned 0x0058c8581b9fed6864faa654505bc89890cdb2dd
Btc is outperforming ETH by fkn 27% right now 💀
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @redaltcoins. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@redaltcoins named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RedAltcoins 💰” (@redaltcoins), 177 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redaltcoins.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.