Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Записки редактора

@redaktor030

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

115subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002693145244
TypeChannel
Username@redaktor030
CreatedBetween 1 April 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/redaktor030

Growth

115116115.57 August 2026 — 116 subscribers9 August 2026 — 116 subscribers15 August 2026 — 115 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 115–116 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 12:54115-1
9 Aug 2026, 05:31116no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:06116first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 5 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 13s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

66 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2842.4%
🤣1928.8%
😁1218.2%
👍46.06%
🔥34.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 February 2026 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Jul 2026, 07:17 UTC54 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Кстати, я уже не редактор... Надо придумать как переименовать канальчик. Вести я его буду как попало, но пусть будет)

3

2 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC53 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Не заходила в ТГ с 9 апреля🤣 Самое время залететь с новым контентом

5😁2

19 Mar 2026, 08:59 UTC104 viewsread 9 August 2026

Ничего не грузит. Может, ну его, этот телеграмм 😂

17 Mar 2026, 10:08 UTC106 viewsread 9 August 2026
Video

Убираться я люблю. А еще больше люблю смотреть как кто-то (что-то) делает это вместо тебя. Мой новый помощник - робот-мойщик. Потрясающий мальчик 🩷 Заказывала Ма себе на подарок к 8 марта. Прекрасный сюрприз, если вы в поисках что подарить. Ловите артикул: 622913875

16 Feb 2026, 07:25 UTC160 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Выставили пост на АТВ, что нам нужны корреспонденты. Написали «ЗВОНИТЕ». Сразу понятно - пишет зумер.

😁7

15 Feb 2026, 11:50 UTC145 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Мое «Женское счастье» умирает 🥲 Купила новый цветок. Надеюсь, будет долго радовать и цвести

3

15 Feb 2026, 11:42 UTC123 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Потекли слюнки? 🤤 Готовимся к Масленице и всех ждем в воскресенье в Этнографическом на локации АТВ

🔥31

6 Feb 2026, 03:43 UTC162 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

У нас Андрей Семенович на днях завел телеграм. А сегодня создали группу в 11:30. Но в 11:33 смысла в существовании группы уже нет. Надеюсь, это не саботаж, а просто человек еще не научился им пользоваться🤣

😁31

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @redaktor030. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Записки редактора” (@redaktor030), 115 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redaktor030.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.