Posted without readable text
👍4

Channel
@redactoed
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
71subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002095209611 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @redactoed |
| Description | Если кто и летом на лыжах, Этот, значит, точно из рыжих! https://t.me/k_rada |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/redactoed |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 71 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 71 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 24 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (24 April 2026 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 326 |
| Reactions total | 16 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 23:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
122 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 44 | 36.1% | |
| 👍 | 29 | 23.8% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 13.9% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 9.02% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 4.92% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 4.10% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 3.28% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.64% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 1.64% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.82% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 April 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
👍4
ИИ ИИ ИИ ИИ не приносит прибыли никому, кроме тех, кто продаёт железо, на котором живёт ИИ. Главные ИИшные компании, OpenAI с Antropic, — они чьи? Говорю снова, скажу ещё не раз: это наркота, кто не подсел, тому будет проще слезать. Что на картинке: это мониторинг расходов и доходов передовых компаний в сфере искусственного интеллекта в реальном времени.
🔥2🤔1
Ох нифига, теперь в ТГ можно ещё и вот так! Да, картинки вставляются в текст, а не только сверху или снизу. И теперь есть таблицы! Какие, интересно? И списки. И формулы, вау...
Что там «под капотом» Под капотом — двигательный отсек. Или женщина. Последние лет 150 чаще двигатель, чем женщина. Если вы не реконструктор, который шьёт и носит капоты 18 века, если речь в вашем тексте идёт не про автомобиль и его двигательный отсек — у вас нет капота. Ну вот нет его, и соответственно, под ним ничего быть не может. Хотите объяснить, из чего состоит приложение, раскрыть секреты его архитектуры — …
🔥3⚡1😁1
Настроение дня
😁4
Ноут или десктоп: что покупать? Знакомый пришёл посоветоваться: ему сказали, что за те деньги, которые просят за ноутбук, лучше собрать стационарный ПК по запчастям — он будет производительнее. Да, действительно, лет 25-30 назад так и было. У ПК был железный аргумент — его можно апгрейдить. Ноутбуки были дорогие и маленькие, не всегда умели подключать внешние мониторы, грелись, плохо держали заряд. А ещё у экранов …
🔥8👍2👀1👌1🗿1
Семь бед — одын нейросэт Раз за разом наблюдаю один и тот же сценарий. У человека есть задача. Человек её как-то решает, и это уныло: например, он ведёт огромную таблицу в Экселе. Человек думает, как это упростить, и ответ всегда один — внедрить нейросеть. Человек идёт к начальству, получает одобрямс и начинает внедрять LLM, но с наскока и в лоб это не срабатывает — нейросеть врёт, теряет контексты, делает не то и…
🤔3💯2🔥2
Сказано — сделано На Хабре вышел полный вариант интервью, которое нам дал биоинформатик, кандидат биологических наук Богдан Кириллов. Читайте и по-хорошему охуевайте радуйтесь за нас, как радуемся мы сами. https://habr.com/ru/articles/1048528/
🔥4🫡4
😎😎😎😎😎 Вам кажется, что вы управляете нейросетями? Правда? Там ещё много буков, но первых двух фраз достаточно. Оператор управляет: 😎 оператор крана знает, как повернуть кран, куда нужно, как его остановить и запустить; 😎 оператор машинного доения распоряжается аппаратом, чтобы получить результат, обслуживает аппарат, моет и содержит в чистоте; 😎 оператор станка с ЧПУ знает, что будет делать его станок через минуту,…
👍5🔥3💯2
Да, теперь вы знаете, что по-сербски сингулярное разложение матрицы называется СИНГУЛАРНА ДЕКОМПОЗИЦИJА ВРЕДНОСТИ. Вьетнамские флэшбэки с первого курса у кого?
😁4
Анонса-ма Пришла интриговать и греть аудиторию. Моя любимая статья из главредства в «Кто студенте» — про биоинформатика Богдана Кириллова. Но только пять человек знают, что на самом деле она гораздо больше. Мы нарезали её с кровью ради читаемости и частично — толерантности, потому что некоторые коллеги считали, что аудитория КС не в состоянии пережить остроту материала. Сейчас мы бы поступили иначе. Собственно, и по…
🔥5⚡1👀1
Гадалки нового века и когда БЯМ будет монополистом Поставьте ваши сервера ближе к экранам, сейчас начнётся сеанс зарядки! Раньше из каждой дыры струились лучи эзотерики, сейчас точно так же струится ИИ. Почему же я сравниваю эти два сценария? Большие языковые модели гадают точно так же, как эзотерики. Т9 в ваших телефонах тоже БЯМ. Мы пользуемся нейронками последние лет 30, но только сейчас они стали популярны, по…
👍3🔥1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @redactoed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,041,296 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Редактоид” (@redactoed), 71 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redactoed.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.