Channel
@red_packets
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
250subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001660146708 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @red_packets |
| Description | where red packets with new year wishes are distributed. |
| Created | 16 January 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/red_packets |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 250 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 250 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 16 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
46 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 30 | 65.2% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 15.2% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 10.9% | |
| 👻 | 4 | 8.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2023 to 23 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
紅包活動順利結束，看看大家收了多少紅包： C1 98.16 / 188.88 ( 5/10) C2 85.01 / 160.00 ( 5/10) C3 160.00 / 160.00 (20/20) C4 123.09 / 188.88 ( 6/10) C5 140.00 / 140.00 (15/15) C6 140.00 / 140.00 (10/10) B1 184.31 / 266.66 ( 7/10) B2 143.78 / 240.00 ( 3/ 6) B3 82.77 / 280.00 ( 3/10) 從數額來看共計投放CNY1764.42，群友們成功贏走了CNY1157.12，達到了65.6%；從個數來看，群友們贏走了101個紅包中的74個，太成功了。 感謝各位的參與，@Laoself 、 @Hexagram_Daily 和 @EFW_inno 在這邊祝大家兔年大吉！🐇 如果你遺憾沒能做出其中幾題，這…
👍11🎉7❤3
紅包都還有約20分鐘過期，請注意時間。
👍4
B1 追加提示： 本題的答案其實是其他任意一題的答案。
C2 - 提示2 - Circle Around
❤2
C4追加提示： 是個文字遊戲，不要試圖去理解，要去斷章取義
👍1
C2 - 提示1 - U+
感覺是有人多人沒 get 到這個吧。
👍3
C4 追加提示： 答案為若干個大寫英文字母。
👍1
B3 Damage Calculator #技術向 #難 #byEFW_inno 假设Baldrsky v1.04的运行环境，在同一combo中主角操纵机首先进行了一次Imperial Strike的攻击，进而进行了一次LV3身体冲撞（Body Blow）的攻击,考虑到武器补正值，不考虑敌我积蓄热量和其他外界因素，问这次身体冲撞造成的伤害为多少？（答案是一个正整数） 有效期至 1.23 14:31。
B1 The Hard Way #技術向 #中等 #byLaoself 不靠bot裡的web app，也不用修改Telegram客戶端，怎麼提交答案呢？ 補充： 不用bot上的web app，但是要用bot。 本題提交方式不是那個提交按鈕。 有效期至 1.23 14:35。 追加提示： 本題的答案其實是其他任意一題的答案。
C6 Wish Upon an Algorithm #非技術向 #中等 #byEFW_inno 话题建模模组tomotopy中基于Blei & Lafferty (2006)中的想法建立了某个模型，请问这个模型中形状参数c的初始设定值是多少？（答案是0~1之间的一个有理数） 有效期至 1.23 14:30 已领完！
👍1
C5 The Sound of Music #非技術向 #簡單 #byEFW_inno 在 @EFW_inno 频道中上传的音乐中很多都来自于一个top 500美少女游戏音乐排行（见置顶3），问最早出现在频道中的一首曲目的编号是多少？（答案是三位数字的正整数） 有效期至 1.23 14:29 已领完！
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @red_packets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Red Packets” (@red_packets), 250 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/red_packets.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.