Channel
@recomsrda
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
55subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002154088206 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @recomsrda |
| Description | Здᴇᴄь ʙы нᴀйдᴇᴛᴇ ʍᴏи ʍыᴄᴧи и ʍнᴇниᴇ ᴨᴏ Ꭺʙᴀᴛᴀᴩу, и ʍнᴏᴦᴏ чᴇᴦᴏ инᴛᴇᴩᴇᴄнᴏᴦᴏ. |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/recomsrda |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:00 | 55 | no change |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 55 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
186 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 77 | 41.4% | |
| 🔥 | 37 | 19.9% | |
| ❤ | 26 | 14.0% | |
| 🍓 | 18 | 9.68% | |
| 😭 | 10 | 5.38% | |
| 💋 | 9 | 4.84% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 3.76% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 1.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 December 2025 to 18 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем доброго времени суток. К сожалению, сейчас я охладела к фд «Аватар», мне уже он не так интересен в плане делать какой-либо контент по нему. Мне просто уже не о чем писать. Фильм получился разочарованием года с красивой картинкой и говном сюжетом и повествованием. Я посты делаю через силу, так как будто уже всё, что можно написать, уже сделала. К тому же стало от подписчиков меньше отдачи, просмотры просели, реак…
😭8❤🔥3💔2
Ꮋᴇ ɜᴀδыʙᴀᥔᴛᴇ ᴄᴛᴀʙᥙᴛь ᴩᴇᴀᴋцᥙᥙ, нᴀδᥙᴩᴀᴇʍ нᴀ ᴨᴏᴄᴛᴀ᥊ нᴇ ʍᴇньɯᴇ 30 ᴩᴇᴀᴋцᥙᥔ
Вᥴᥱⲙ д᧐δρ᧐ᴦ᧐ ʙρᥱⲙᥱнᥙ ᥴуᴛ᧐κ, д᧐ρ᧐ᴦᥙᥱ ᥰ᧐дᥰᥙᥴчᥙκᥙ. Сегодня хочется выразиться по поводу темы, почему я считаю, скажем так, не очень хорошим действием со стороны тех, кто вступает в отношения с нави, я ведь писала, что будет пост об этом. В фильме, конечно, показано довольно красочно семейная жизнь человека и нави, имею в виду Джейка и Нормана, у которого тоже дети есть, но не стоит забывать уровень развития двух рас. Лю…
💘8🍓3❤1
К сожалению, в силу своей занятости пост сегодня не выйдет, прошу понять и простить. 🙏
💘6❤2❤🔥2🍓1💋1
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤3💘2
Ꮋᴇ ɜᴀδыʙᴀᥔᴛᴇ ᴄᴛᴀʙᥙᴛь ᴩᴇᴀᴋцᥙᥙ, нᴀδᥙᴩᴀᴇʍ нᴀ ᴨᴏᴄᴛᴀ᥊ нᴇ ʍᴇньɯᴇ 30 ᴩᴇᴀᴋцᥙᥔ
❤3
Вᥴᥱⲙ д᧐δρ᧐ᴦ᧐ ʙρᥱⲙᥱнᥙ ᥴуᴛ᧐κ, д᧐ρ᧐ᴦᥙᥱ ᥰ᧐дᥰᥙᥴчᥙκᥙ. Сейчас довольно много видео и комментарии вижу, что люди так хотят вернуть Нетеяма, особенно после того, как у Кири развились способности. Будто такого не было даже после второго фильма, и, честно, это немного раздражает. Я не понимаю такого культа Нетеяма, ведь это переходит все границы разумного. Который фильм подряд они хотят, чтоб его каким-нибудь образом воскресили…
🔥9💘5❤2❤🔥2
Ꮋᴇ ɜᴀδыʙᴀᥔᴛᴇ ᴄᴛᴀʙᥙᴛь ᴩᴇᴀᴋцᥙᥙ, нᴀδᥙᴩᴀᴇʍ нᴀ ᴨᴏᴄᴛᴀ᥊ нᴇ ʍᴇньɯᴇ 30 ᴩᴇᴀᴋцᥙᥔ
❤4
Вᥴᥱⲙ д᧐δρ᧐ᴦ᧐ ʙρᥱⲙᥱнᥙ ᥴуᴛ᧐κ, д᧐ρ᧐ᴦᥙᥱ ᥰ᧐дᥰᥙᥴчᥙκᥙ. Так как выход следующих двух частей франшизы планируется, то хочу немного поворчать на этот счёт, потому что молчать не получится. Я не знаю, как к этому относиться, но мандража уже не будет, как было с третьей частью, когда такое долгое время ждала фильм. И я на деле не так сильно, наверное, буду ждать продолжения, потому что мне уже становится понятно, что хорошего ма…
💘10❤2🍓2🔥2
Ꮋᴇ ɜᴀδыʙᴀᥔᴛᴇ ᴄᴛᴀʙᥙᴛь ᴩᴇᴀᴋцᥙᥙ, нᴀδᥙᴩᴀᴇʍ нᴀ ᴨᴏᴄᴛᴀ᥊ нᴇ ʍᴇньɯᴇ 30 ᴩᴇᴀᴋцᥙᥔ
💋3
Вᥴᥱⲙ д᧐δρ᧐ᴦ᧐ ʙρᥱⲙᥱнᥙ ᥴуᴛ᧐κ, д᧐ρ᧐ᴦᥙᥱ ᥰ᧐дᥰᥙᥴчᥙκᥙ. Не буду забывать тематику своего канала и поговорим про Лайла более подробно. Так как получила немного информации из книги по третьему фильму. Лайл является в этом фильме полной противоположностью Майлза, так как, в отличие от него, он налаживает отношения с людьми и держится за свое прошлое «я». И он, как всегда, не в восторге от действий полковника, но сам же выполняе…
🔥9🍓2💘2
Ꮋᴇ ɜᴀδыʙᴀᥔᴛᴇ ᴄᴛᴀʙᥙᴛь ᴩᴇᴀᴋцᥙᥙ, нᴀδᥙᴩᴀᴇʍ нᴀ ᴨᴏᴄᴛᴀ᥊ нᴇ ʍᴇньɯᴇ 30 ᴩᴇᴀᴋцᥙᥔ
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @recomsrda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“(Закрыто) 𑀝᧐᧐δщᥱᥴᴛʙ᧐ ρᥱκ᧐ⲙ᧐ʙ” (@recomsrda), 55 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/recomsrda.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.