Channel
@recluseLi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
655subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002080353912 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @recluseLi |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/recluseLi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 655 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 654 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:19 | 654 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (19 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,356 |
| Reactions total | 825 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
825 reactions across 19 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5404626849164709243 | 409 | 49.6% | |
| custom 5453909060560639787 | 228 | 27.6% | |
| custom 5402590132723270335 | 188 | 22.8% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 825reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @recluseLi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Йосано: Хей, красотка Коё: А? Ты это мне? Йосано: Конечно, ты видишь здесь другую красотку? Дазай: Я, вообще-то, но вы продолжайте, не хотел портить момент
custom 540462684916470924340custom 545390906056063978714custom 540259013272327033510
На самом деле, Рембо извинялся за своё отношение к Верлену, но у меня есть ощущение, что это вопрос недопонимания и недосказанности. Верлен слышал в этом «ты же ведёшь себя как человек, значит, всё нормально», когда Рембо имел в виду «не имеет значения, как именно ты появился, главное, что ты человечнее всех, кого я знал»
custom 540462684916470924328custom 54539090605606397878custom 54025901327232703352
Когда я хожу и рассказываю на каждом углу, как я вступила в бсд фд, я чувствую себя женатой женщиной, которая каждому встречному рассказывает, как она любит свою жену
custom 545390906056063978728custom 540462684916470924311custom 54025901327232703355
🧩 [фф: Behind the scenes]
custom 540462684916470924329custom 54539090605606397877custom 54025901327232703352
Акутагава считает, что первой эмоцией, которую он ощутил в своей жизни, была ненависть. Я с этим не согласна. Акутагава захотел отомстить, потому что кто-то убил его товарищей. Без чувств и привязанности этого всего бы не было. Без малышки Гин, которую он забрал в мафию с собой, без товарищей. Первая эмоция, которую Акутагава ощутил — привязанность, товарищество. Именно поэтому он смог так сильно ненавидеть — ненавис…
custom 545390906056063978731custom 540462684916470924310custom 54025901327232703353
Мне нравится символизм мысли, что под влиянием Порчи Чуя действительно способен разрушить всё, к чему прикасается, а Дазай про себя думает, что тот человек, который разрушает всё, к чему хочет прикоснуться — это он сам
custom 540462684916470924332custom 545390906056063978710custom 54025901327232703358
Верлен думал, что он не смог найти что-то хорошее в человечестве и ненавидел его до последнего, но в итоге он же и стал косвенно причиной спасения человечества, предоставив Чуе ключ. У Чуи было довольно много людей в его жизни, которых он по-настоящему ценил. Верлену было достаточно только возлюбленного и младшего брата, чтобы дать человечеству шанс.
custom 540462684916470924335custom 545390906056063978712custom 54025901327232703355
Не то чтобы я был экспертом, но, по-моему, это сложное чувство гейства
custom 540462684916470924342custom 545390906056063978718custom 54025901327232703351
Ребят, одна реакция слетела, вкиньте, пожалуйста, кто богатый/кому не жалко: https://t.me/boost/recluseLi
custom 540462684916470924316custom 54025901327232703359custom 54539090605606397876
💙🤩💙 Раздражающий шум оживлённых улиц Лондона тонет в довольно громкой музыке в машине, под которую Дазай покачивает головой, оглядываясь на дорогу. В конце концов, люди на улицах знают, чем рискуют, сами виноваты, что умудрились выжить спустя столько попыток массового «вырезания», как друг друга, так и не совсем, и при этом высунулись на улицу именно в тот день, когда здесь ездит Дазай. На первый взгляд небольшой ви…
custom 540462684916470924331custom 545390906056063978719custom 540259013272327033511
✝️🪦🕊🪦🤍🤍🤍🪦🕊🪦✝️ ┄═┄═┄═┄┄═┄═┄═┄┄═┄═┄═┄ 🤩🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🤩 🪽Пэйринг🦋: Осаму Дазай/Чуя Накахара 🪽Основные метки🦋: Aнгелы/Демоны, Романтика, Ангст, Стёб/Юмор, Исторические эпохи. 🪽Описание🦋: Ходят слухи, что демоны разъезжают на красных Феррари и держат в квартире целую домашнюю библиотеку, а ангелы владеют вечно закрытыми винными магазинчиками в Лондоне. 🤩Читать🤩: VI. Каждому отдельно.
custom 540462684916470924316custom 540259013272327033510custom 54539090605606397877
🕺
custom 540259013272327033536custom 54539090605606397875custom 54046268491647092434
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @recluseLi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 191,253 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“затворница Ли” (@recluseLi), 655 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/recluseLi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.