Channel
@rebenok_roditeli
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11,688subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001204387520 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rebenok_roditeli |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rebenok_roditeli |
Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 6 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @rebenok_roditeli/2075 · this entry11 Nov 2025, 15:29 UTC | @mamochki_deti/224912 Nov 2025, 17:09 UTC | 1.00 | 26 hours |
| @rebenok_roditeli/2078 · this entry14 Nov 2025, 16:08 UTC | @mamochki_deti/225215 Nov 2025, 14:12 UTC | 1.00 | 22 hours |
| @rebenok_roditeli/2080 · this entry16 Nov 2025, 17:25 UTC | @mamochki_deti/225417 Nov 2025, 16:52 UTC | 1.00 | 23 hours |
| @rebenok_roditeli/2088 · this entry23 Nov 2025, 16:22 UTC | @mamochki_deti/226124 Nov 2025, 16:31 UTC | 1.00 | 24 hours |
| @rebenok_roditeli/2087 · this entry22 Nov 2025, 17:01 UTC | @mamochki_deti/226225 Nov 2025, 16:29 UTC | 1.00 | 3 days |
| @rebenok_roditeli/2090 · this entry25 Nov 2025, 16:28 UTC | @mamochki_deti/226326 Nov 2025, 17:58 UTC | 1.00 | 26 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @mamochki_deti | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 25 hours | this entry (8–0) |
| @rostimrebenka | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 2 days | this entry (6–1) |
| @vospitay_detey | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 3 days | this entry (4–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 2 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 11 November 2025 to 30 November 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 6, the earliest publisher we hold is @rebenok_roditeli — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 5 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 11,688 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 11,689 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 11,691 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 11,693 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:05 | 11,695 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 11,696 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 11,698 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 11,698 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
АНАЛИЗ ДЕТСКИХ РИСУНКОВ Статья «Анализ детских рисунков» навеяла мне воспоминания, как вызвал меня в садик психолог и со страшными глазами показывает "семейный" рисунок моего сына. Ребенок явно постарался: нарисовал ВСЕХ! А именно: себя, кошек без хвостов, собаку без одной ноги, папу с мешком, маму с топором, одну сестру с ружьем, а вторую с палкой и бабушку с кирпичом. И плюс под ногами какие-то цветные муравьи коп…
ДЕТСКИЙ МАССАЖ В ИГРОВОЙ ФОРМЕ Поглаживание: Кошка к мальчику (к девочке) пришла, Мягкой лапкой провела. Гладит лапкой кошечка: «Отдохни немножечко». Припев: Мур-мур-мур, Мур-мур-мур, Отдохни немножечко. /дважды Растирание круговое: Солнце глянуло в окошко: Где наш маленький Серёжка (Алёшка, Антошка)? И по кругу побежало, Еще ярче засверкало. Припев: Ля-ля-ля, Ля-ля-ля, Светит солнышко друзьям. /дважды Пощипыв…
А КАК УЙТИ ОТ ПЕЛЕНАНИЯ? Пеленание можно использовать до тех пор, пока это помогает малышу засыпать. Но если вы все же решили уйти от пеленания, то лучше сделать это постепенно: ✔️Оставьте сначала свободными только ножки и дайте привыкнуть к новому состоянию пару дней ✔️Освободите одну ручку и снова дайте малышу привыкнуть ✔️Освободите вторую ручку...И... ну вы поняли😀 Замените пеленку на спальный мешок. Можно убрат…
Бусинка🥰
Поговорим о тревожности у детей Как предположить тревожность у ребёнка? Ваш ребёнок более тревожен, чем другие дети его возраста? Ваш ребёнок более обеспокоен, чем другие дети его возраста? Если на оба вопроса - «да», то скорее всего у вашего ребёнка имеется повышенная тревога. Для ребят с 9 лет существует тест на выявление тревоги с помощью вопросов. Как ведёт себя ребёнок? Тревожным детям сложно концентрировать…
Счастье - это когда есть кому пожелать Доброго утра, Спокойной ночи... И просто знать, что тебя ждут и тебе есть куда спешить.
Про ингаляции Ингаляционный способ доставки различных лекарственных средств традиционно применяют в медицине – это значит, что ингаляция обеспечивает быструю доставку препарата в дыхательные пути. Известно также, что при ингаляционном введении лекарственных препаратов (с помощью небулайзера) риск системных эффектов (влияния на весь организм) значительно ниже, чем при приеме внутрь или инъекционном. 🧐Ингаляциями по…
Мне говорят: я в чем-то изменилась.. А мне на эти глупости плевать! Ведь главного я статуса добилась - любимая жена и мать!!!
Про ингаляции Ингаляционный способ доставки различных лекарственных средств традиционно применяют в медицине – это значит, что ингаляция обеспечивает быструю доставку препарата в дыхательные пути. Известно также, что при ингаляционном введении лекарственных препаратов (с помощью небулайзера) риск системных эффектов (влияния на весь организм) значительно ниже, чем при приеме внутрь или инъекционном. 🧐Ингаляциями по…
ТРИ ВАРИАНТА ОТВЕТА НА ДЕТСКОЕ «НЕ-Е-Е-Е-ЕТ» 1.Акцент на то, что ребенок упускает, чего лишается, когда настаивает на своем. «Я не сразу поняла, что это такое. В 2,5 года дочка пережила общий наркоз. И когда она первый раз (через день после наркоза) начала вечером истошно кричать "не бай, не бай!", я решила, что она просто боится засыпать. Я объясняла ей, что мама рядом, что больше никто ничего не будет с ней делат…
Начать с себя Характер человека, его отношение к самому себе, к людям и труду формируется, прежде всего, под влиянием близких. Да и гены в наших детях от папы и от мамы. А отца и мать своему ребенку мы сами выбираем. Поэтому я всегда говорю пациентам: «Если хотите увидеть причину своих несчастий — подойдите к зеркалу». Но честно взглянуть и оценить себя трудно. Например, одна мама говорит мне: «Я воспитываю сына так…
Материнство — самая трудная из работ, приносящая радость
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rebenok_roditeli. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,435,823 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ребенок и Родители. Обучение и Воспитание” (@rebenok_roditeli), 11,688 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rebenok_roditeli.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.